From: Michael Walle <mwalle@kernel.org>
To: Nishanth Menon <nm@ti.com>, Vignesh Raghavendra <vigneshr@ti.com>,
Tero Kristo <kristo@kernel.org>, Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk+dt@kernel.org>,
Conor Dooley <conor+dt@kernel.org>,
Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>,
Bartosz Golaszewski <brgl@bgdev.pl>,
Jared McArthur <j-mcarthur@ti.com>
Cc: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org,
Michael Walle <mwalle@kernel.org>
Subject: [PATCH 1/2] arm64: dts: ti: k3-am62p: fix pinctrl settings
Date: Fri, 21 Feb 2025 10:14:46 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20250221091447.595199-1-mwalle@kernel.org> (raw)
It appears that pinctrl-single is misused on this SoC to control both
the mux and the input and output and bias settings. This results in
non-working pinctrl configurations for GPIOs within the device tree.
This is what happens:
(1) During startup the pinctrl settings are applied according to the
device tree. I.e. the pin is configured as output and with
pull-ups enabled.
(2) During startup a device driver requests a GPIO.
(3) pinctrl-single is applying the default GPIO setting according to
the pinctrl-single,gpio-range property.
This would work as expected if the pinctrl-single is only controlling
the function mux, but it also controls the input/output buffer enable,
the pull-up and pull-down settings etc (pinctrl-single,function-mask
covers the entire pad setting instead of just the mux field).
Remove the pinctrl-single,gpio-range property, so that no settings are
applied during a gpio_request() call.
Fixes: d72d73a44c3c ("arm64: dts: ti: k3-am62p: Add gpio-ranges properties")
Signed-off-by: Michael Walle <mwalle@kernel.org>
---
Maybe one could also switch the pinctrl-single to a pinconf-single node
which is able to control all the bias settings and restrict
"pinctrl-single,function-mask" to just the actual function. Not
sure.
.../boot/dts/ti/k3-am62p-j722s-common-mcu.dtsi | 8 --------
arch/arm64/boot/dts/ti/k3-am62p-main.dtsi | 14 --------------
2 files changed, 22 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/ti/k3-am62p-j722s-common-mcu.dtsi b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/ti/k3-am62p-j722s-common-mcu.dtsi
index b33aff0d65c9..bd6a00d13aea 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/ti/k3-am62p-j722s-common-mcu.dtsi
+++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/ti/k3-am62p-j722s-common-mcu.dtsi
@@ -12,15 +12,7 @@ mcu_pmx0: pinctrl@4084000 {
#pinctrl-cells = <1>;
pinctrl-single,register-width = <32>;
pinctrl-single,function-mask = <0xffffffff>;
- pinctrl-single,gpio-range =
- <&mcu_pmx_range 0 21 PIN_GPIO_RANGE_IOPAD>,
- <&mcu_pmx_range 23 1 PIN_GPIO_RANGE_IOPAD>,
- <&mcu_pmx_range 32 2 PIN_GPIO_RANGE_IOPAD>;
bootph-all;
-
- mcu_pmx_range: gpio-range {
- #pinctrl-single,gpio-range-cells = <3>;
- };
};
mcu_esm: esm@4100000 {
diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/ti/k3-am62p-main.dtsi b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/ti/k3-am62p-main.dtsi
index 420c77c8e9e5..0a888392137c 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/ti/k3-am62p-main.dtsi
+++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/ti/k3-am62p-main.dtsi
@@ -42,20 +42,6 @@ &inta_main_dmss {
ti,interrupt-ranges = <5 69 35>;
};
-&main_pmx0 {
- pinctrl-single,gpio-range =
- <&main_pmx0_range 0 32 PIN_GPIO_RANGE_IOPAD>,
- <&main_pmx0_range 33 38 PIN_GPIO_RANGE_IOPAD>,
- <&main_pmx0_range 72 22 PIN_GPIO_RANGE_IOPAD>,
- <&main_pmx0_range 137 5 PIN_GPIO_RANGE_IOPAD>,
- <&main_pmx0_range 143 3 PIN_GPIO_RANGE_IOPAD>,
- <&main_pmx0_range 149 2 PIN_GPIO_RANGE_IOPAD>;
-
- main_pmx0_range: gpio-range {
- #pinctrl-single,gpio-range-cells = <3>;
- };
-};
-
&main_gpio0 {
gpio-ranges = <&main_pmx0 0 0 32>, <&main_pmx0 32 33 38>,
<&main_pmx0 70 72 22>;
--
2.39.5
next reply other threads:[~2025-02-21 9:14 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-02-21 9:14 Michael Walle [this message]
2025-02-21 9:14 ` [PATCH 2/2] arm64: dts: ti: k3-j722s: " Michael Walle
2025-03-07 10:35 ` [PATCH 1/2] arm64: dts: ti: k3-am62p: " Vignesh Raghavendra
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20250221091447.595199-1-mwalle@kernel.org \
--to=mwalle@kernel.org \
--cc=brgl@bgdev.pl \
--cc=conor+dt@kernel.org \
--cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=j-mcarthur@ti.com \
--cc=kristo@kernel.org \
--cc=krzk+dt@kernel.org \
--cc=linus.walleij@linaro.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=nm@ti.com \
--cc=robh@kernel.org \
--cc=vigneshr@ti.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®