mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Vitaliy Shevtsov <v.shevtsov@mt-integration.ru>
To: Christophe JAILLET <christophe.jaillet@wanadoo.fr>
Cc: Hans Verkuil <hverkuil@xs4all.nl>,
	Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@kernel.org>,
	Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>,
	<linux-media@vger.kernel.org>, <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	<lvc-project@linuxtesting.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] media: cec: avoid wraparound in timer interval calculation
Date: Sun, 2 Mar 2025 02:28:06 +0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20250302022806.e66f4f2903748b9bc63289c2@mt-integration.ru> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <cff4d412-abbf-44b5-9705-ba14dff7d5d0@wanadoo.fr>

On Sat, 1 Mar 2025 12:32:30 +0100, Christophe JAILLET wrote:

> Le 01/03/2025 à 12:09, Vitaliy Shevtsov a écrit :
> > [Why]
> > The timer function code may have an integer wraparound issue. Since both
> > pin->tx_custom_low_usecs and pin->tx_custom_high_usecs can be set to up to
> > 9999999 from the user space via cec_pin_error_inj_parse_line(), this may
> > cause usecs to be overflowed when adap->monitor_pin_cnt is zero and usecs
> > is multiplied by 1000.
> > 
> > [How]
> > Fix this by casting usecs to u64 when it is being converted from
> > microseconds to nanoseconds.
> > 
> > Found by Linux Verification Center (linuxtesting.org) with Svace.
> > 
> > Fixes: 865463fc03ed ("media: cec-pin: add error injection support")
> > Signed-off-by: Vitaliy Shevtsov <v.shevtsov@mt-integration.ru>
> > ---
> >   drivers/media/cec/core/cec-pin.c | 2 +-
> >   1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> > 
> > diff --git a/drivers/media/cec/core/cec-pin.c b/drivers/media/cec/core/cec-pin.c
> > index a70451d99ebc..f15ed5c67a65 100644
> > --- a/drivers/media/cec/core/cec-pin.c
> > +++ b/drivers/media/cec/core/cec-pin.c
> > @@ -1021,7 +1021,7 @@ static enum hrtimer_restart cec_pin_timer(struct hrtimer *timer)
> >   		pin->wait_usecs = 0;
> >   		pin->timer_ts = ktime_add_us(ts, usecs);
> >   		hrtimer_forward_now(timer,
> > -				ns_to_ktime(usecs * 1000));
> > +				ns_to_ktime((u64)usecs * 1000));
> 
> Or maybe us_to_ktime() to be less verbose?
> 
> CJ
> 

That makes sense but let me check first. I will send a new one soon.

> >   		return HRTIMER_RESTART;
> >   	}
> >   	pin->wait_usecs = usecs - 100;
> 


-- 
Vitaliy Shevtsov <v.shevtsov@mt-integration.ru>

      reply	other threads:[~2025-03-01 21:29 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-03-01 11:09 Vitaliy Shevtsov
2025-03-01 11:32 ` Christophe JAILLET
2025-03-01 21:28   ` Vitaliy Shevtsov [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20250302022806.e66f4f2903748b9bc63289c2@mt-integration.ru \
    --to=v.shevtsov@mt-integration.ru \
    --cc=christophe.jaillet@wanadoo.fr \
    --cc=hverkuil@xs4all.nl \
    --cc=jani.nikula@intel.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-media@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=lvc-project@linuxtesting.org \
    --cc=mchehab@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®