From: Thinh Nguyen <Thinh.Nguyen@synopsys.com>
To: Wesley Cheng <quic_wcheng@quicinc.com>
Cc: Thinh Nguyen <Thinh.Nguyen@synopsys.com>,
"gregkh@linuxfoundation.org" <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
"linux-usb@vger.kernel.org" <linux-usb@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] Revert "usb: dwc3: gadget: Fix incorrect UDC state after manual deconfiguration"
Date: Mon, 3 Mar 2025 23:24:17 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20250303232411.2sq47ohcygmwd2bo@synopsys.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <109547e4-fc2a-42b6-9f16-6e0979b9a49b@quicinc.com>
On Fri, Feb 28, 2025, Wesley Cheng wrote:
> Hi Thinh,
>
> On 2/28/2025 6:01 PM, Thinh Nguyen wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > On Fri, Feb 28, 2025, Wesley Cheng wrote:
> >> This reverts commit 1ff24d40b3c3c673d833c546f898133b80dffc39.
> >>
> >> The following change creates a potential use after freed scenario within
> >> the UDC core level. When transitioning from peripheral to host mode, the
> >> DWC3 DRD will remove the USB UDC using usb_del_gadget(). As part of the
> >> UDC removal routine, the UDC core will issue a pullup disable call back to
> >> the DWC3 gadget driver, which will now call usb_gadget_set_state(), and
> >> queues gadget->work. If gadget->work is unable to complete before the USB
> >> gadget is freed, then we will run into the use after freed situation.
> >>
> >> Below is the callstack in question:
> >>
> >> dwc3_gadget_exit()
> >> --> usb_del_gadget()
> >> --> gadget_unbind_driver()
> >> --> device_del()
> >> --> gadget_unbind_driver()
> >> --> usb_gadget_disconnect_locked()
> >> --> pullup(0)
> >> --> dwc3_gadget_soft_disconnect()
> >> --> usb_gadget_set_state(UNATTACHED)
> >> --> queue_work(gadget->work) --> async
> >> --> device_unregister()
> >>
> >> Unfortunately, the flush_work() call within usb_del_gadget() doesn't work
> >> in this situation, as it happens before the device_del() and soft
> >> disconnect sequence.
> >>
> >> Signed-off-by: Wesley Cheng <quic_wcheng@quicinc.com>
> >> ---
> >> drivers/usb/dwc3/gadget.c | 2 --
> >> 1 file changed, 2 deletions(-)
> >>
> >> diff --git a/drivers/usb/dwc3/gadget.c b/drivers/usb/dwc3/gadget.c
> >> index 5156fafbda6c..921f72995dbf 100644
> >> --- a/drivers/usb/dwc3/gadget.c
> >> +++ b/drivers/usb/dwc3/gadget.c
> >> @@ -2781,8 +2781,6 @@ static int dwc3_gadget_soft_disconnect(struct dwc3 *dwc)
> >> __dwc3_gadget_stop(dwc);
> >> spin_unlock_irqrestore(&dwc->lock, flags);
> >>
> >> - usb_gadget_set_state(dwc->gadget, USB_STATE_NOTATTACHED);
> >> -
> >> return ret;
> >> }
> >>
> >
> > Have you tried with this fix?
> > https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://web.git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/commit/?id=399a45e5237ca14037120b1b895bd38a3b4492ea__;!!A4F2R9G_pg!c0-XJOQST8G_jMPRaU0NxsP4zRPkygId8mQEsUGwxzQEsz2XuX4JsnesMTuaGuyVgN7hNmYJ3gg-cUeowVZaG_m7DP4$
> >
>
> Thanks for pointing that out. Looks like its working fine for me. Bit odd
> that we're still potentially utilizing the usb gadget after calling
> device_del(), but I guess that should be fine.
>
Yeah, but device_del() isn't usb_del_gadget(). We just need to make sure
the usb gadget isn't used after usb_del_gadget().
BR,
Thinh
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-03-03 23:24 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-03-01 0:34 [PATCH 0/2] Fix use after freed situation in UDC core Wesley Cheng
2025-03-01 0:34 ` [PATCH 1/2] Revert "usb: dwc3: gadget: Fix incorrect UDC state after manual deconfiguration" Wesley Cheng
2025-03-01 2:01 ` Thinh Nguyen
2025-03-01 2:33 ` Wesley Cheng
2025-03-03 23:24 ` Thinh Nguyen [this message]
2025-03-01 0:34 ` [PATCH 2/2] usb: gadget: udc: Update USB gadget state during soft disconnect Wesley Cheng
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20250303232411.2sq47ohcygmwd2bo@synopsys.com \
--to=thinh.nguyen@synopsys.com \
--cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-usb@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=quic_wcheng@quicinc.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®