From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mail.ozlabs.org (gandalf.ozlabs.org [150.107.74.76]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5FB801C84A8; Tue, 4 Mar 2025 05:25:35 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=150.107.74.76 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1741065940; cv=none; b=RS18yyswOTlCxa2QDiN/1O/41S6Ks5F/ImP1q0H6OgO5j3ct7EeMX+9aO6skeGIaCnpmbUZs7jbT++hq0ET8E/OJyJMHsrqJswxsoAezYszkWaGASeZDAyIJj/z1Hhpt+hCgwJrGyBz0ioQH7cHoLMObe9kZZ7SoIQAzbq77uuQ= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1741065940; c=relaxed/simple; bh=yufR5BZrqjyqGIWtajAmw1B10wOKwfMS4y1pR6xF0jQ=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=pbwWxJB3fA3RsFP1n+rkVuberr+QlzmelghQWTrbjMExdKCLBkbLVmNT5e5naE+wEzFwD9XZ4Bb/BRf3kbwFhgxi9E2Pz/PS3K4Vvnn9A7ufbvJqQZbWrysLOyjAsGN8KhQPcWjIvkfU67B49xdMXOuxfZ4ZNmng55sQBNBWx38= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=canb.auug.org.au; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=canb.auug.org.au; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=canb.auug.org.au header.i=@canb.auug.org.au header.b=A4O9VTCB; arc=none smtp.client-ip=150.107.74.76 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=canb.auug.org.au Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=canb.auug.org.au Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=canb.auug.org.au header.i=@canb.auug.org.au header.b="A4O9VTCB" DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=canb.auug.org.au; s=201702; t=1741065934; bh=iOpVniZ53Nx0Ms4uAYPg05TFSXLSXXsH0CbYFM9XcQc=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:From; b=A4O9VTCBM7JVuzjWvEYdOebq1jYYtCNn26gC1gJSrFj3vm/njaYhpMjfOr3msbtVI vPIQDz7f9JIqCbQ28Zs2vY00V+NLMBHMjxmlBeW3LOvbDUjT++eK6rzgK7CDcWSwf3 nJFfYxr9EU6MJaIrUua2etJP4bN1B59xE8mMN+PQOIfIuQDCfjjteO/kkNw0Dsm9yA oDcpj0PdzcqqDquYlTip5klPb7kI5vm6Bg/1pm/TjIevT9+Hs9z8IRQl5INuxjNlD1 /OYlz85/k81A9NNyoPY+PXAYJSacHbOeaaAwZUHyXI9yqv2o8M+WBrIyDyYDrVVAJl k1ZzHcHRd8Zng== Received: from authenticated.ozlabs.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (Client did not present a certificate) by mail.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 4Z6PK90mNqz4x2g; Tue, 4 Mar 2025 16:25:32 +1100 (AEDT) Date: Tue, 4 Mar 2025 16:25:31 +1100 From: Stephen Rothwell To: Thomas Gleixner , Ingo Molnar , "H. Peter Anvin" , Peter Zijlstra Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List , Linux Next Mailing List Subject: linux-next: build failure after merge of the tip tree Message-ID: <20250304162402.475eb3bc@canb.auug.org.au> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Hi all, After merging the tip tree, today's linux-next build (x86_64 allmodconfig) failed like this: In file included from include/asm-generic/percpu.h:7, from arch/x86/include/asm/percpu.h:597, from arch/x86/include/asm/preempt.h:6, from include/linux/preempt.h:79, from include/linux/spinlock.h:56, from include/linux/wait.h:9, from include/linux/wait_bit.h:8, from include/linux/fs.h:7, from kernel/events/core.c:11: kernel/events/core.c: In function 'this_cpc': include/linux/percpu-defs.h:220:45: error: initialization from pointer to non-enclosed address space 220 | const void __percpu *__vpp_verify = (typeof((ptr) + 0))NULL; \ | ^ include/linux/percpu-defs.h:251:9: note: in expansion of macro '__verify_pcpu_ptr' 251 | __verify_pcpu_ptr(ptr); \ | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ kernel/events/core.c:1222:17: note: in expansion of macro 'this_cpu_ptr' 1222 | return *this_cpu_ptr(pmu->cpu_pmu_context); | ^~~~~~~~~~~~ (and many more similar) Presumably caused by commit f67d1ffd841f ("perf/core: Detach 'struct perf_cpu_pmu_context' and 'struct pmu' lifetimes") I have used the tip tree from next-20250303 for today. -- Cheers, Stephen Rothwell