From: Luis Henriques <luis@igalia.com>
To: Miklos Szeredi <miklos@szeredi.hu>, Bernd Schubert <bernd@bsbernd.com>
Cc: linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
kernel-dev@igalia.com, Luis Henriques <luis@igalia.com>
Subject: [PATCH] fuse: fix possible deadlock if rings are never initialized
Date: Thu, 6 Mar 2025 11:12:18 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20250306111218.13734-1-luis@igalia.com> (raw)
When mounting a user-space filesystem using io_uring, the initialization
of the rings is done separately in the server side. If for some reason
(e.g. a server bug) this step is not performed it will be impossible to
unmount the filesystem if there are already requests waiting.
This issue is easily reproduced with the libfuse passthrough_ll example,
if the queue depth is set to '0' and a request is queued before trying to
unmount the filesystem. When trying to force the unmount, fuse_abort_conn()
will try to wake up all tasks waiting in fc->blocked_waitq, but because the
rings were never initialized, fuse_uring_ready() will never return 'true'.
Fixes: 3393ff964e0f ("fuse: block request allocation until io-uring init is complete")
Signed-off-by: Luis Henriques <luis@igalia.com>
---
fs/fuse/dev.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/fs/fuse/dev.c b/fs/fuse/dev.c
index 7edceecedfa5..2fe565e9b403 100644
--- a/fs/fuse/dev.c
+++ b/fs/fuse/dev.c
@@ -77,7 +77,7 @@ void fuse_set_initialized(struct fuse_conn *fc)
static bool fuse_block_alloc(struct fuse_conn *fc, bool for_background)
{
return !fc->initialized || (for_background && fc->blocked) ||
- (fc->io_uring && !fuse_uring_ready(fc));
+ (fc->io_uring && fc->connected && !fuse_uring_ready(fc));
}
static void fuse_drop_waiting(struct fuse_conn *fc)
next reply other threads:[~2025-03-06 11:12 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-03-06 11:12 Luis Henriques [this message]
2025-03-06 11:45 ` Bernd Schubert
2025-03-06 13:16 ` Luis Henriques
2025-03-06 13:48 ` Bernd Schubert
2025-03-19 11:32 ` Luis Henriques
2025-03-19 11:42 ` Miklos Szeredi
2025-03-19 13:00 ` Christian Brauner
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20250306111218.13734-1-luis@igalia.com \
--to=luis@igalia.com \
--cc=bernd@bsbernd.com \
--cc=kernel-dev@igalia.com \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=miklos@szeredi.hu \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®