mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: mhkelley58@gmail.com
To: haiyangz@microsoft.com, wei.liu@kernel.org, decui@microsoft.com,
	kys@microsoft.com, jakeo@microsoft.com,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-hyperv@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH v2 1/1] Drivers: hv: vmbus: Don't release fb_mmio resource in vmbus_free_mmio()
Date: Sun,  9 Mar 2025 20:52:08 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20250310035208.275764-1-mhklinux@outlook.com> (raw)

From: Michael Kelley <mhklinux@outlook.com>

The VMBus driver manages the MMIO space it owns via the hyperv_mmio
resource tree. Because the synthetic video framebuffer portion of the
MMIO space is initially setup by the Hyper-V host for each guest, the
VMBus driver does an early reserve of that portion of MMIO space in the
hyperv_mmio resource tree. It saves a pointer to that resource in
fb_mmio. When a VMBus driver requests MMIO space and passes "true"
for the "fb_overlap_ok" argument, the reserved framebuffer space is
used if possible. In that case it's not necessary to do another request
against the "shadow" hyperv_mmio resource tree because that resource
was already requested in the early reserve steps.

However, the vmbus_free_mmio() function currently does no special
handling for the fb_mmio resource. When a framebuffer device is
removed, or the driver is unbound, the current code for
vmbus_free_mmio() releases the reserved resource, leaving fb_mmio
pointing to memory that has been freed. If the same or another
driver is subsequently bound to the device, vmbus_allocate_mmio()
checks against fb_mmio, and potentially gets garbage. Furthermore
a second unbind operation produces this "nonexistent resource" error
because of the unbalanced behavior between vmbus_allocate_mmio() and
vmbus_free_mmio():

[   55.499643] resource: Trying to free nonexistent
			resource <0x00000000f0000000-0x00000000f07fffff>

Fix this by adding logic to vmbus_free_mmio() to recognize when
MMIO space in the fb_mmio reserved area would be released, and don't
release it. This filtering ensures the fb_mmio resource always exists,
and makes vmbus_free_mmio() more parallel with vmbus_allocate_mmio().

Fixes: be000f93e5d7 ("drivers:hv: Track allocations of children of hv_vmbus in private resource tree")
Signed-off-by: Michael Kelley <mhklinux@outlook.com>
Tested-by: Saurabh Sengar <ssengar@linux.microsoft.com>
Reviewed-by: Saurabh Sengar <ssengar@linux.microsoft.com>
---
Changes in v2:
* Fixed minor formatting issues reported by checkpatch.pl --strict
  [Saurabh Sengar]

 drivers/hv/vmbus_drv.c | 13 +++++++++++++
 1 file changed, 13 insertions(+)

diff --git a/drivers/hv/vmbus_drv.c b/drivers/hv/vmbus_drv.c
index 22afebfc28ff..8d3cff42bdbb 100644
--- a/drivers/hv/vmbus_drv.c
+++ b/drivers/hv/vmbus_drv.c
@@ -2272,12 +2272,25 @@ void vmbus_free_mmio(resource_size_t start, resource_size_t size)
 	struct resource *iter;
 
 	mutex_lock(&hyperv_mmio_lock);
+
+	/*
+	 * If all bytes of the MMIO range to be released are within the
+	 * special case fb_mmio shadow region, skip releasing the shadow
+	 * region since no corresponding __request_region() was done
+	 * in vmbus_allocate_mmio().
+	 */
+	if (fb_mmio && start >= fb_mmio->start &&
+	    (start + size - 1 <= fb_mmio->end))
+		goto skip_shadow_release;
+
 	for (iter = hyperv_mmio; iter; iter = iter->sibling) {
 		if ((iter->start >= start + size) || (iter->end <= start))
 			continue;
 
 		__release_region(iter, start, size);
 	}
+
+skip_shadow_release:
 	release_mem_region(start, size);
 	mutex_unlock(&hyperv_mmio_lock);
 
-- 
2.25.1


             reply	other threads:[~2025-03-10  3:52 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-03-10  3:52 mhkelley58 [this message]
2025-03-10 16:54 ` Wei Liu

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20250310035208.275764-1-mhklinux@outlook.com \
    --to=mhkelley58@gmail.com \
    --cc=decui@microsoft.com \
    --cc=haiyangz@microsoft.com \
    --cc=jakeo@microsoft.com \
    --cc=kys@microsoft.com \
    --cc=linux-hyperv@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mhklinux@outlook.com \
    --cc=wei.liu@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®