From: Christian Eggers <ceggers@arri.de>
To: Liam Girdwood <lgirdwood@gmail.com>,
Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>,
Douglas Anderson <dianders@chromium.org>
Cc: <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Christian Eggers <ceggers@arri.de>, <stable@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: [PATCH 1/2] regulator: dummy: force synchronous probing
Date: Mon, 10 Mar 2025 17:33:01 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20250310163302.15276-1-ceggers@arri.de> (raw)
Sometimes I get a NULL pointer dereference at boot time in kobject_get()
with the following call stack:
anatop_regulator_probe()
devm_regulator_register()
regulator_register()
regulator_resolve_supply()
kobject_get()
By placing some extra BUG_ON() statements I could verify that this is
raised because probing of the 'dummy' regulator driver is not completed
('dummy_regulator_rdev' is still NULL).
In the JTAG debugger I can see that dummy_regulator_probe() and
anatop_regulator_probe() can be run by different kernel threads
(kworker/u4:*). I haven't further investigated whether this can be
changed or if there are other possibilities to force synchronization
between these two probe routines. On the other hand I don't expect much
boot time penalty by probing the 'dummy' regulator synchronously.
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Fixes: 259b93b21a9f ("regulator: Set PROBE_PREFER_ASYNCHRONOUS for drivers that existed in 4.14")
Signed-off-by: Christian Eggers <ceggers@arri.de>
---
drivers/regulator/dummy.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/drivers/regulator/dummy.c b/drivers/regulator/dummy.c
index 5b9b9e4e762d..9f59889129ab 100644
--- a/drivers/regulator/dummy.c
+++ b/drivers/regulator/dummy.c
@@ -60,7 +60,7 @@ static struct platform_driver dummy_regulator_driver = {
.probe = dummy_regulator_probe,
.driver = {
.name = "reg-dummy",
- .probe_type = PROBE_PREFER_ASYNCHRONOUS,
+ .probe_type = PROBE_FORCE_SYNCHRONOUS,
},
};
--
2.43.0
next reply other threads:[~2025-03-10 16:33 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-03-10 16:33 Christian Eggers [this message]
2025-03-10 16:33 ` [PATCH 2/2] regulator: assert that dummy regulator has been probed before using it Christian Eggers
2025-03-10 17:23 ` Mark Brown
2025-03-10 18:22 ` Christian Eggers
2025-03-10 19:39 ` Mark Brown
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20250310163302.15276-1-ceggers@arri.de \
--to=ceggers@arri.de \
--cc=broonie@kernel.org \
--cc=dianders@chromium.org \
--cc=lgirdwood@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®