From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au>
To: Alistair Popple <apopple@nvidia.com>
Cc: "Andrew Morton" <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
"Dave Airlie" <airlied@redhat.com>,
"Lucas De Marchi" <lucas.demarchi@intel.com>,
"Thomas Hellström" <thomas.hellstrom@linux.intel.com>,
"DRM XE List" <intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org>,
"Balbir Singh" <balbirs@nvidia.com>,
"Linux Kernel Mailing List" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
"Linux Next Mailing List" <linux-next@vger.kernel.org>,
"Matthew Brost" <matthew.brost@intel.com>,
DRI <dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org>
Subject: Re: linux-next: manual merge of the drm-xe tree with the mm tree
Date: Tue, 11 Mar 2025 18:02:02 +1100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20250311180202.058334d5@canb.auug.org.au> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <kk4fmefhwnis4lwlvssgu6t54o5mkahgyz4cm3wjh2hgtriexh@x3xseg5v7nrm>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 492 bytes --]
Hi Alistair,
On Tue, 11 Mar 2025 16:57:49 +1100 Alistair Popple <apopple@nvidia.com> wrote:
>
> I'm not sure what the process is here, but having either reviewed or authored
> these patches I can add that the fix up carried below looks correct.
Thanks. This means that people can have a bit more confidence in the
resulting linux-next tree (and so can I :-)) and when the merge
requests are sent to Linus, they can just reference my resolution.
--
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell
[-- Attachment #2: OpenPGP digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 488 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-03-11 7:02 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-03-07 1:29 Stephen Rothwell
2025-03-11 2:12 ` Stephen Rothwell
2025-03-11 5:57 ` Alistair Popple
2025-03-11 7:02 ` Stephen Rothwell [this message]
2025-03-30 23:26 ` Stephen Rothwell
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20250311180202.058334d5@canb.auug.org.au \
--to=sfr@canb.auug.org.au \
--cc=airlied@redhat.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=apopple@nvidia.com \
--cc=balbirs@nvidia.com \
--cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-next@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=lucas.demarchi@intel.com \
--cc=matthew.brost@intel.com \
--cc=thomas.hellstrom@linux.intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®