mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
To: Libo Chen <libo.chen@oracle.com>
Cc: mgorman@techsingularity.net, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	mingo@redhat.com, tj@kernel.org, juri.lelli@redhat.com,
	vincent.guittot@linaro.org, akpm@linux-foundation.org,
	longman@redhat.com, lorenzo.stoakes@oracle.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] sched/numa: skip VMA scanning on memory pinned to one NUMA node via cpuset.mems
Date: Wed, 12 Mar 2025 09:01:02 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20250312080102.GF19424@noisy.programming.kicks-ass.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250311160447.2813222-1-libo.chen@oracle.com>

On Tue, Mar 11, 2025 at 09:04:47AM -0700, Libo Chen wrote:
> When the memory of the current task is pinned to one NUMA node by cgroup,
> there is no point in continuing the rest of VMA scanning and hinting page
> faults as they will just be overhead. With this change, there will be no
> more unnecessary PTE updates or page faults in this scenario.

Its been a while since I looked at all this, but if we don't scan these
pages, then it will not account for these pages, and the pinned memory
will not become an attractor for the tasks that use this memory, right?

> Signed-off-by: Libo Chen <libo.chen@oracle.com>
> ---
>  kernel/sched/fair.c | 7 +++++++
>  1 file changed, 7 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/kernel/sched/fair.c b/kernel/sched/fair.c
> index c798d27952431..ec4749a7be33a 100644
> --- a/kernel/sched/fair.c
> +++ b/kernel/sched/fair.c
> @@ -3315,6 +3315,13 @@ static void task_numa_work(struct callback_head *work)
>  	if (p->flags & PF_EXITING)
>  		return;
>  
> +	/*
> +	 * Memory is pinned to only one NUMA node via cpuset.mems, naturally
> +	 * no page can be migrated.
> +	 */
> +	if (nodes_weight(cpuset_current_mems_allowed) == 1)
> +		return;
> +
>  	if (!mm->numa_next_scan) {
>  		mm->numa_next_scan = now +
>  			msecs_to_jiffies(sysctl_numa_balancing_scan_delay);
> -- 
> 2.43.5
> 

  parent reply	other threads:[~2025-03-12  8:01 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-03-11 16:04 Libo Chen
2025-03-11 17:42 ` Waiman Long
2025-03-12  2:18   ` Libo Chen
2025-03-12  8:01 ` Peter Zijlstra [this message]
2025-03-12 23:49   ` Libo Chen

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20250312080102.GF19424@noisy.programming.kicks-ass.net \
    --to=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=juri.lelli@redhat.com \
    --cc=libo.chen@oracle.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=longman@redhat.com \
    --cc=lorenzo.stoakes@oracle.com \
    --cc=mgorman@techsingularity.net \
    --cc=mingo@redhat.com \
    --cc=tj@kernel.org \
    --cc=vincent.guittot@linaro.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®