From: kth <kangtaeho2456@gmail.com>
To: corbet@lwn.net
Cc: linux-doc@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
kth <kangtaeho2456@gmail.com>
Subject: [PATCH] docs: Remove outdated highuid.rst documentation
Date: Thu, 13 Mar 2025 13:12:52 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20250313051252.18471-1-kangtaeho2456@gmail.com> (raw)
The highuid.rst document describes a transition that is outdated and no longer relevant. Additionally, it references filesystems (ncpfs and smbfs) that have been removed or replaced.
Signed-off-by: Kang Taeho <kangtaeho2456@gmail.com>
---
Documentation/admin-guide/highuid.rst | 80 ---------------------------
1 file changed, 80 deletions(-)
delete mode 100644 Documentation/admin-guide/highuid.rst
diff --git a/Documentation/admin-guide/highuid.rst b/Documentation/admin-guide/highuid.rst
deleted file mode 100644
index 9239067563a1..000000000000
--- a/Documentation/admin-guide/highuid.rst
+++ /dev/null
@@ -1,80 +0,0 @@
-===================================================
-Notes on the change from 16-bit UIDs to 32-bit UIDs
-===================================================
-
-:Author: Chris Wing <wingc@umich.edu>
-:Last updated: January 11, 2000
-
-- kernel code MUST take into account __kernel_uid_t and __kernel_uid32_t
- when communicating between user and kernel space in an ioctl or data
- structure.
-
-- kernel code should use uid_t and gid_t in kernel-private structures and
- code.
-
-What's left to be done for 32-bit UIDs on all Linux architectures:
-
-- Disk quotas have an interesting limitation that is not related to the
- maximum UID/GID. They are limited by the maximum file size on the
- underlying filesystem, because quota records are written at offsets
- corresponding to the UID in question.
- Further investigation is needed to see if the quota system can cope
- properly with huge UIDs. If it can deal with 64-bit file offsets on all
- architectures, this should not be a problem.
-
-- Decide whether or not to keep backwards compatibility with the system
- accounting file, or if we should break it as the comments suggest
- (currently, the old 16-bit UID and GID are still written to disk, and
- part of the former pad space is used to store separate 32-bit UID and
- GID)
-
-- Need to validate that OS emulation calls the 16-bit UID
- compatibility syscalls, if the OS being emulated used 16-bit UIDs, or
- uses the 32-bit UID system calls properly otherwise.
-
- This affects at least:
-
- - iBCS on Intel
-
- - sparc32 emulation on sparc64
- (need to support whatever new 32-bit UID system calls are added to
- sparc32)
-
-- Validate that all filesystems behave properly.
-
- At present, 32-bit UIDs _should_ work for:
-
- - ext2
- - ufs
- - isofs
- - nfs
- - coda
- - udf
-
- Ioctl() fixups have been made for:
-
- - ncpfs
- - smbfs
-
- Filesystems with simple fixups to prevent 16-bit UID wraparound:
-
- - minix
- - sysv
- - qnx4
-
- Other filesystems have not been checked yet.
-
-- The ncpfs and smbfs filesystems cannot presently use 32-bit UIDs in
- all ioctl()s. Some new ioctl()s have been added with 32-bit UIDs, but
- more are needed. (as well as new user<->kernel data structures)
-
-- The ELF core dump format only supports 16-bit UIDs on arm, i386, m68k,
- sh, and sparc32. Fixing this is probably not that important, but would
- require adding a new ELF section.
-
-- The ioctl()s used to control the in-kernel NFS server only support
- 16-bit UIDs on arm, i386, m68k, sh, and sparc32.
-
-- make sure that the UID mapping feature of AX25 networking works properly
- (it should be safe because it's always used a 32-bit integer to
- communicate between user and kernel)
--
2.48.1
next reply other threads:[~2025-03-13 5:13 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-03-13 5:12 kth [this message]
2025-03-13 13:44 ` Jonathan Corbet
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20250313051252.18471-1-kangtaeho2456@gmail.com \
--to=kangtaeho2456@gmail.com \
--cc=corbet@lwn.net \
--cc=linux-doc@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®