From: Mateusz Guzik <mjguzik@gmail.com>
To: brauner@kernel.org
Cc: viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk, jack@suse.cz,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org,
Mateusz Guzik <mjguzik@gmail.com>
Subject: [PATCH] fs: consistently deref the files table with rcu_access_pointer()
Date: Thu, 13 Mar 2025 13:31:59 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20250313123159.1315079-1-mjguzik@gmail.com> (raw)
... except when the table is known to be only used by one thread.
A file pointer can get installed at any moment despite the ->file_lock
being held since the following:
8a81252b774b53e6 ("fs/file.c: don't acquire files->file_lock in fd_install()")
Accesses subject to such a race can in principle suffer load tearing.
While here redo the comment in dup_fd() as it only covered a race against
files showing up, still assuming fd_install() takes the lock.
Signed-off-by: Mateusz Guzik <mjguzik@gmail.com>
---
I confirmed the possiblity of the problem with this:
https://lwn.net/Articles/793253/#Load%20Tearing
Granted, the article being 6 years old might mean some magic was added
by now to prevent this particular problem.
While technically this classifies as a bugfix, given that nothing blew
up and this is more of a "just in case" change, I don't think this
warrants any backports. Thus I'm not adding a Fixes: tag to prevent this
from being picked by autosel.
fs/file.c | 26 +++++++++++++++++---------
1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
diff --git a/fs/file.c b/fs/file.c
index 6c159ede55f1..52010ecb27b8 100644
--- a/fs/file.c
+++ b/fs/file.c
@@ -423,17 +423,25 @@ struct files_struct *dup_fd(struct files_struct *oldf, struct fd_range *punch_ho
old_fds = old_fdt->fd;
new_fds = new_fdt->fd;
+ /*
+ * We may be racing against fd allocation from other threads using this
+ * files_struct, despite holding ->file_lock.
+ *
+ * alloc_fd() might have already claimed a slot, while fd_install()
+ * did not populate it yet. Note the latter operates locklessly, so
+ * the file can show up as we are walking the array below.
+ *
+ * At the same time we know no files will disappear as all other
+ * operations take the lock.
+ *
+ * Instead of trying to placate userspace racing with itself, we
+ * ref the file if we see it and mark the fd slot as unused otherwise.
+ */
for (i = open_files; i != 0; i--) {
- struct file *f = *old_fds++;
+ struct file *f = rcu_access_pointer(*old_fds++);
if (f) {
get_file(f);
} else {
- /*
- * The fd may be claimed in the fd bitmap but not yet
- * instantiated in the files array if a sibling thread
- * is partway through open(). So make sure that this
- * fd is available to the new process.
- */
__clear_open_fd(open_files - i, new_fdt);
}
rcu_assign_pointer(*new_fds++, f);
@@ -684,7 +692,7 @@ struct file *file_close_fd_locked(struct files_struct *files, unsigned fd)
return NULL;
fd = array_index_nospec(fd, fdt->max_fds);
- file = fdt->fd[fd];
+ file = rcu_access_pointer(fdt->fd[fd]);
if (file) {
rcu_assign_pointer(fdt->fd[fd], NULL);
__put_unused_fd(files, fd);
@@ -1252,7 +1260,7 @@ __releases(&files->file_lock)
*/
fdt = files_fdtable(files);
fd = array_index_nospec(fd, fdt->max_fds);
- tofree = fdt->fd[fd];
+ tofree = rcu_access_pointer(fdt->fd[fd]);
if (!tofree && fd_is_open(fd, fdt))
goto Ebusy;
get_file(file);
--
2.43.0
next reply other threads:[~2025-03-13 12:32 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-03-13 12:31 Mateusz Guzik [this message]
2025-03-13 13:42 ` Mateusz Guzik
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20250313123159.1315079-1-mjguzik@gmail.com \
--to=mjguzik@gmail.com \
--cc=brauner@kernel.org \
--cc=jack@suse.cz \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®