mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Maxime Ripard <mripard@kernel.org>
To: Dmitry Baryshkov <dmitry.baryshkov@oss.qualcomm.com>
Cc: Andy Yan <andyshrk@163.com>,
	 Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com>,
	Thomas Zimmermann <tzimmermann@suse.de>,
	 David Airlie <airlied@gmail.com>,
	Simona Vetter <simona@ffwll.ch>,
	 Andrzej Hajda <andrzej.hajda@intel.com>,
	Neil Armstrong <neil.armstrong@linaro.org>,
	 Robert Foss <rfoss@kernel.org>,
	Laurent Pinchart <Laurent.pinchart@ideasonboard.com>,
	 Jonas Karlman <jonas@kwiboo.se>,
	Jernej Skrabec <jernej.skrabec@gmail.com>,
	 Douglas Anderson <dianders@chromium.org>,
	Herve Codina <herve.codina@bootlin.com>,
	 dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	 Dmitry Baryshkov <dmitry.baryshkov@linaro.org>,
	Simona Vetter <simona.vetter@ffwll.ch>,
	lumag@kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 04/16] drm/atomic: Introduce helper to lookup connector by encoder
Date: Fri, 14 Mar 2025 18:40:24 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20250314-hissing-spirited-armadillo-dc9d3a@houat> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <lf4wu5v3wym3foqgimuulyzz2dmd2jezkj3otn7xm7xp77nast@azqmajrn45lw>

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 9696 bytes --]

On Fri, Mar 14, 2025 at 09:59:36AM +0200, Dmitry Baryshkov wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 14, 2025 at 08:45:17AM +0100, Maxime Ripard wrote:
> > On Fri, Mar 14, 2025 at 07:52:35AM +0200, Dmitry Baryshkov wrote:
> > > On Fri, Mar 14, 2025 at 08:50:29AM +0800, Andy Yan wrote:
> > > > At 2025-03-13 19:55:33, "Maxime Ripard" <mripard@kernel.org> wrote:
> > > > >Hi,
> > > > >
> > > > >On Thu, Mar 13, 2025 at 04:09:54PM +0800, Andy Yan wrote:
> > > > >> At 2025-03-05 19:55:19, "Andy Yan" <andyshrk@163.com> wrote:
> > > > >> >At 2025-03-04 19:10:47, "Maxime Ripard" <mripard@kernel.org> wrote:
> > > > >> >>With the bridges switching over to drm_bridge_connector, the direct
> > > > >> >>association between a bridge driver and its connector was lost.
> > > > >> >>
> > > > >> >>This is mitigated for atomic bridge drivers by the fact you can access
> > > > >> >>the encoder, and then call drm_atomic_get_old_connector_for_encoder() or
> > > > >> >>drm_atomic_get_new_connector_for_encoder() with drm_atomic_state.
> > > > >> >>
> > > > >> >>This was also made easier by providing drm_atomic_state directly to all
> > > > >> >>atomic hooks bridges can implement.
> > > > >> >>
> > > > >> >>However, bridge drivers don't have a way to access drm_atomic_state
> > > > >> >>outside of the modeset path, like from the hotplug interrupt path or any
> > > > >> >>interrupt handler.
> > > > >> >>
> > > > >> >>Let's introduce a function to retrieve the connector currently assigned
> > > > >> >>to an encoder, without using drm_atomic_state, to make these drivers'
> > > > >> >>life easier.
> > > > >> >>
> > > > >> >>Reviewed-by: Dmitry Baryshkov <dmitry.baryshkov@linaro.org>
> > > > >> >>Co-developed-by: Simona Vetter <simona.vetter@ffwll.ch>
> > > > >> >>Signed-off-by: Maxime Ripard <mripard@kernel.org>
> > > > >> >>---
> > > > >> >> drivers/gpu/drm/drm_atomic.c | 45 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> > > > >> >> include/drm/drm_atomic.h     |  3 +++
> > > > >> >> 2 files changed, 48 insertions(+)
> > > > >> >>
> > > > >> >>diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_atomic.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_atomic.c
> > > > >> >>index 9ea2611770f43ce7ccba410406d5f2c528aab022..b926b132590e78f8d41d48eb4da4bccf170ee236 100644
> > > > >> >>--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_atomic.c
> > > > >> >>+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_atomic.c
> > > > >> >>@@ -985,10 +985,55 @@ drm_atomic_get_new_connector_for_encoder(const struct drm_atomic_state *state,
> > > > >> >> 
> > > > >> >> 	return NULL;
> > > > >> >> }
> > > > >> >> EXPORT_SYMBOL(drm_atomic_get_new_connector_for_encoder);
> > > > >> >> 
> > > > >> >>+/**
> > > > >> >>+ * drm_atomic_get_connector_for_encoder - Get connector currently assigned to an encoder
> > > > >> >>+ * @encoder: The encoder to find the connector of
> > > > >> >>+ * @ctx: Modeset locking context
> > > > >> >>+ *
> > > > >> >>+ * This function finds and returns the connector currently assigned to
> > > > >> >>+ * an @encoder.
> > > > >> >>+ *
> > > > >> >>+ * Returns:
> > > > >> >>+ * The connector connected to @encoder, or an error pointer otherwise.
> > > > >> >>+ * When the error is EDEADLK, a deadlock has been detected and the
> > > > >> >>+ * sequence must be restarted.
> > > > >> >>+ */
> > > > >> >>+struct drm_connector *
> > > > >> >>+drm_atomic_get_connector_for_encoder(const struct drm_encoder *encoder,
> > > > >> >>+				     struct drm_modeset_acquire_ctx *ctx)
> > > > >> >>+{
> > > > >> >>+	struct drm_connector_list_iter conn_iter;
> > > > >> >>+	struct drm_connector *out_connector = ERR_PTR(-EINVAL);
> > > > >> >>+	struct drm_connector *connector;
> > > > >> >>+	struct drm_device *dev = encoder->dev;
> > > > >> >>+	int ret;
> > > > >> >>+
> > > > >> >>+	ret = drm_modeset_lock(&dev->mode_config.connection_mutex, ctx);
> > > > >> >>+	if (ret)
> > > > >> >>+		return ERR_PTR(ret);
> > > > >> >
> > > > >> >It seems that this will cause a deadlock when called from a  hotplug handling path,
> > > > >> >I have a WIP DP diver[0],  which suggested by Dmitry to use this API from a 
> > > > >> >&drm_bridge_funcs.detect callback to get the connector,  as detect is called by drm_helper_probe_detect,
> > > > >> >which will hold connection_mutex first, so the deaklock happens:
> > > > >> >
> > > > >> >
> > > > >> >drm_helper_probe_detect(struct drm_connector *connector,
> > > > >> >                        struct drm_modeset_acquire_ctx *ctx,
> > > > >> >                        bool force)
> > > > >> >{
> > > > >> >        const struct drm_connector_helper_funcs *funcs = connector->helper_private;
> > > > >> >        struct drm_device *dev = connector->dev;
> > > > >> >        int ret;
> > > > >> >
> > > > >> >        if (!ctx)
> > > > >> >                return drm_helper_probe_detect_ctx(connector, force);
> > > > >> >
> > > > >> >        ret = drm_modeset_lock(&dev->mode_config.connection_mutex, ctx);
> > > > >> >        if (ret)
> > > > >> >                return ret;
> > > > >> >
> > > > >> >        if (funcs->detect_ctx)
> > > > >> >                ret = funcs->detect_ctx(connector, ctx, force);
> > > > >> >        else if (connector->funcs->detect)
> > > > >> >                ret = connector->funcs->detect(connector, force);
> > > > >> >        else
> > > > >> >                ret = connector_status_connected;
> > > > >> >
> > > > >> >        if (ret != connector->status)
> > > > >> >                connector->epoch_counter += 1;
> > > > >> >
> > > > >> >So I wonder can we let drm_bridge_funcs.detect pass a connector for this case ?
> > > > >> >
> > > > >> >
> > > > >> >
> > > > >> >[0]https://lore.kernel.org/linux-rockchip/047EECFC-7E55-44EC-896F-13FE04333E4D@gmail.com/T/#m25bc53b79f5cc7bddfcb7aae5656f68df396f094
> > > > >> >>+
> > > > >> >>+	drm_connector_list_iter_begin(dev, &conn_iter);
> > > > >> >>+	drm_for_each_connector_iter(connector, &conn_iter) {
> > > > >> >>+		if (!connector->state)
> > > > >> >>+			continue;
> > > > >> >>+
> > > > >> >>+		if (encoder == connector->state->best_encoder) {
> > > > >> >>+			out_connector = connector;
> > > > >> 
> > > > >> 
> > > > >> When try to use this patch in my bridge driver,  I found that the connector->state->best_encoder 
> > > > >>  maybe NULL when   drm_bridge_funcs.detect or drm_bridge_funcs.detect_ctx is  called:
> > > > >> 
> > > > >> [   52.713030] Invalid return value -22 for connector detection
> > > > >> [   52.713539] WARNING: CPU: 7 PID: 288 at drivers/gpu/drm/drm_probe_helper.c:602 drm_helper_probe_single_connector_modes+0x5e0/
> > > > >> 0x63c
> > > > >> [   52.714568] Modules linked in:
> > > > >> 
> > > > >> [   52.724546] Call trace:
> > > > >> [   52.724762]  drm_helper_probe_single_connector_modes+0x5e0/0x63c (P)
> > > > >> [   52.725319]  drm_mode_getconnector+0x2a4/0x488
> > > > >> [   52.725711]  drm_ioctl_kernel+0xb4/0x11c
> > > > >> [   52.726057]  drm_ioctl+0x22c/0x544
> > > > >> [   52.726358]  __arm64_sys_ioctl+0xac/0xe0
> > > > >> [   52.726706]  invoke_syscall+0x44/0x100
> > > > >> [   52.727039]  el0_svc_common.constprop.0+0x3c/0xd4
> > > > >> 
> > > > >> This is because  best_encoder is set by set_best_encoder, which is called from
> > > > >> drm_atomic_helper_check_modeset. When we call drm_mode_getconnector 
> > > > >> for the first time, the functions mentioned above have not been called yet,
> > > > >> then we can't match the encoder from connector->state->best_encoder for this case.
> > > > >
> > > > >As far as I'm concerned, it's by design. Encoders and connectors have
> > > > >1:N relationship, and only once a connector has been enabled it has an
> > > > >encoder.
> > > > >
> > > > >If the connector is disabled, there's no associated encoder.
> > > > 
> > > > Does this prove that this API is not suitable for my application scenario: 
> > > > Get the connector in the bridge's .detect callback, so this means that I may
> > > > still need to modify the bridge's connector callback so that it can pass the connector ?
> > > 
> > > I'd say, yes, please.
> > 
> > And I'd say no :)
> 
> Fair enough :-)
> 
> > There's no reason to deviate from the API other entities have here. It's
> > just that the switch to DRM_BRIDGE_ATTACH_NO_CONNECTOR hasn't been
> > completely thought through and it's one of the part where it shows.
> > 
> > We have two alternative solutions: Either the driver creates the
> > connector itself, since it doesn't seem to use any downstream bridge
> > anyway, or we need a new bridge helper to find the connector on a bridge
> > chain.
> > 
> > We have the iterator already, we just need a new accessor to retrieve
> > the (optional) connector of a bridge, and if there's none, go to the
> > next bridge and try again.
> 
> The problem is that there is no guarantee that the the created connector
> is created for or linked to any bridge. For example, for msm driver I'm
> waiting for several series to go in, but after that I plan to work on
> moving connector creation to the generic code within the msm driver.
> 
> In other words, with DRM_BRIDGE_ATTACH_NO_CONNECTOR in place it is
> perfectly legit not to have a bridge which has "connector of a bridge".
> It is possible to create drm_bridge_connector on the drm_encoder's side
> after the drm_bridge_attach() succeeds.

Sure, but then I'd expect detect and get_modes to only be called *after*
that connector has been created, right?

Returning NULL in the case where we don't have a connector (yet?) in
such a case would make total sense to me, just like we return NULL if
the connector is disabled and doesn't have an encoder here.

Maxime

[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 273 bytes --]

  reply	other threads:[~2025-03-14 17:40 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 52+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-03-04 11:10 [PATCH v5 00/16] drm/bridge: Various quality of life improvements Maxime Ripard
2025-03-04 11:10 ` [PATCH v5 01/16] drm/bridge: Add encoder parameter to drm_bridge_funcs.attach Maxime Ripard
2025-03-05 13:04   ` Luca Ceresoli
2025-03-04 11:10 ` [PATCH v5 02/16] drm/bridge: Provide a helper to retrieve current bridge state Maxime Ripard
2025-03-04 11:10 ` [PATCH v5 03/16] drm/tests: Add kunit tests for bridges Maxime Ripard
2025-03-04 11:10 ` [PATCH v5 04/16] drm/atomic: Introduce helper to lookup connector by encoder Maxime Ripard
2025-03-05 11:55   ` Andy Yan
2025-03-05 13:19     ` [PATCH " Maxime Ripard
2025-03-05 20:13       ` Dmitry Baryshkov
2025-03-06  1:16         ` Andy Yan
2025-03-06  7:10           ` Maxime Ripard
2025-03-06 15:41             ` Simona Vetter
2025-03-07  1:08               ` Andy Yan
2025-03-07  7:30                 ` Andy Yan
2025-03-07 13:25                   ` Simona Vetter
2025-03-11  6:42                     ` Andy Yan
2025-03-13  8:09     ` Andy Yan
2025-03-13 11:55       ` [PATCH " Maxime Ripard
2025-03-14  0:50         ` Andy Yan
2025-03-14  5:52           ` Dmitry Baryshkov
2025-03-14  7:45             ` Maxime Ripard
2025-03-14  7:59               ` Dmitry Baryshkov
2025-03-14 17:40                 ` Maxime Ripard [this message]
2025-03-14 18:28                   ` Dmitry Baryshkov
2025-03-18 15:51                     ` Maxime Ripard
2025-03-18 19:00                       ` Dmitry Baryshkov
2025-03-19  7:21                         ` Andy Yan
2025-03-21  9:46                         ` Maxime Ripard
2025-03-23  2:22                           ` Dmitry Baryshkov
2025-04-08  3:44                             ` Andy Yan
2025-05-24  8:09                             ` Dmitry Baryshkov
2025-06-19 13:09                               ` Maxime Ripard
2025-07-01  6:21                                 ` Andy Yan
2025-07-01  7:16                                   ` Dmitry Baryshkov
2025-03-06  8:21   ` Herve Codina
2025-03-06 15:44   ` Simona Vetter
2025-03-04 11:10 ` [PATCH v5 05/16] drm/tests: helpers: Create new helper to enable output Maxime Ripard
2025-03-04 11:10 ` [PATCH v5 06/16] drm/tests: hdmi_state_helpers: Switch to new helper Maxime Ripard
2025-03-04 11:10 ` [PATCH v5 07/16] drm/tests: Create tests for drm_atomic Maxime Ripard
2025-03-04 11:10 ` [PATCH v5 08/16] drm/bridge: Add helper to reset bridge pipeline Maxime Ripard
2025-03-06  8:12   ` Herve Codina
2025-03-06 15:46   ` Simona Vetter
2025-03-04 11:10 ` [PATCH v5 09/16] drm/tests: bridge: Provide tests for drm_bridge_helper_reset_crtc Maxime Ripard
2025-03-04 11:10 ` [PATCH v5 10/16] drm/bridge: ti-sn65dsi83: Switch to drm_bridge_helper_reset_crtc Maxime Ripard
2025-03-06  8:09   ` Herve Codina
2025-03-04 11:10 ` [PATCH v5 11/16] drm/bridge: Introduce drm_bridge_is_atomic() helper Maxime Ripard
2025-03-04 11:10 ` [PATCH v5 12/16] drm/bridge: cdns-csi: Switch to atomic helpers Maxime Ripard
2025-03-04 11:10 ` [PATCH v5 13/16] drm/bridge: tc358775: Switch to atomic commit Maxime Ripard
2025-03-04 11:10 ` [PATCH v5 14/16] drm/bridge: tc358768: Stop disabling when failing to enable Maxime Ripard
2025-03-06 15:48   ` Simona Vetter
2025-03-04 11:10 ` [PATCH v5 15/16] drm/bridge: tc358768: Convert to atomic helpers Maxime Ripard
2025-03-04 11:10 ` [PATCH v5 16/16] drm/bridge: ti-sn65dsi86: Remove drm_encoder->crtc use Maxime Ripard

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20250314-hissing-spirited-armadillo-dc9d3a@houat \
    --to=mripard@kernel.org \
    --cc=Laurent.pinchart@ideasonboard.com \
    --cc=airlied@gmail.com \
    --cc=andrzej.hajda@intel.com \
    --cc=andyshrk@163.com \
    --cc=dianders@chromium.org \
    --cc=dmitry.baryshkov@linaro.org \
    --cc=dmitry.baryshkov@oss.qualcomm.com \
    --cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=herve.codina@bootlin.com \
    --cc=jernej.skrabec@gmail.com \
    --cc=jonas@kwiboo.se \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=lumag@kernel.org \
    --cc=maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=neil.armstrong@linaro.org \
    --cc=rfoss@kernel.org \
    --cc=simona.vetter@ffwll.ch \
    --cc=simona@ffwll.ch \
    --cc=tzimmermann@suse.de \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®