From: Christian Brauner <brauner@kernel.org>
To: Mateusz Guzik <mjguzik@gmail.com>
Cc: viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk, jack@suse.cz,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] fs: sort out stale commentary about races between fd alloc and dup2()
Date: Thu, 20 Mar 2025 14:58:28 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20250320-befund-wegnehmen-048d8b9cd252@brauner> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250320104922.1925198-1-mjguzik@gmail.com>
On Thu, Mar 20, 2025 at 11:49:22AM +0100, Mateusz Guzik wrote:
> Userspace may be trying to dup2() over a fd which is allocated but not
> yet populated.
>
> Commentary about it is split in 2 parts (and both warrant changes):
>
> 1. in dup2()
>
> It claims the issue is only relevant for shared descriptor tables which
> is of no concern for POSIX (but then is POSIX of concern to anyone
> today?), which I presume predates standarized threading.
>
> The comment also mentions the following systems:
> - OpenBSD installing a larval file -- they moved away from it, file is
> installed late and EBUSY is returned on conflict
> - FreeBSD returning EBADF -- reworked to install the file early like
> OpenBSD used to do
> - NetBSD "deadlocks in amusing ways" -- their solution looks
> Solaris-inspired (not a compliment) and I would not be particularly
> surprised if it indeed deadlocked, in amusing ways or otherwise
>
> I don't believe mentioning any of these adds anything and the statement
> about the issue not being POSIX-relevant is outdated.
>
> dup2 description in POSIX still does not mention the problem.
>
> 2. above fd_install()
>
> <quote>
> > We need to detect this and fput() the struct file we are about to
> > overwrite in this case.
> >
> > It should never happen - if we allow dup2() do it, _really_ bad things
> > will follow.
> </quote>
>
> I have difficulty parsing it. The first sentence would suggest
> fd_install() tries to detect and recover from the race (it does not),
> the next one claims the race needs to be dealt with (it is, by dup2()).
>
> Given that fd_install() does not suffer the burden, this patch removes
> the above and instead expands on the race in dup2() commentary.
>
> Signed-off-by: Mateusz Guzik <mjguzik@gmail.com>
> ---
>
> This contains the new commentary from:
> https://lore.kernel.org/linux-fsdevel/20250320102637.1924183-1-mjguzik@gmail.com/T/#u
>
> and obsoletes this guy hanging out in -next:
> ommit ec052fae814d467d6aa7e591b4b24531b87e65ec
This is already upstream as of v6.14-rc1. So please make it a diff on
top. ;)
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-03-20 13:58 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-03-20 10:49 Mateusz Guzik
2025-03-20 13:58 ` Christian Brauner [this message]
2025-03-20 14:03 ` Mateusz Guzik
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20250320-befund-wegnehmen-048d8b9cd252@brauner \
--to=brauner@kernel.org \
--cc=jack@suse.cz \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mjguzik@gmail.com \
--cc=viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®