From: Pawan Gupta <pawan.kumar.gupta@linux.intel.com>
To: x86@kernel.org
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@kernel.org>,
Andrew Cooper <andrew.cooper3@citrix.com>
Subject: [PATCH] x86/speculation: Remove the extra ifdef around CALL_NOSPEC
Date: Thu, 20 Mar 2025 11:13:15 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20250320-call-nospec-extra-ifdef-v1-1-d9b084d24820@linux.intel.com> (raw)
Commit 010c4a461c1d ("x86/speculation: Simplify and make CALL_NOSPEC
consistent") added an ifdef CONFIG_MITIGATION_RETPOLINE around the
CALL_NOSPEC definition. This is not required as this code is already under
a larger ifdef.
Remove the extra ifdef, no functional change.
vmlinux size remains same before and after this change.
CONFIG_MITIGATION_RETPOLINE=y:
text data bss dec hex filename
25434752 7342290 2301212 35078254 217406e vmlinux.before
25434752 7342290 2301212 35078254 217406e vmlinux.after
# CONFIG_MITIGATION_RETPOLINE is not set:
text data bss dec hex filename
22943094 6214994 1550152 30708240 1d49210 vmlinux.before
22943094 6214994 1550152 30708240 1d49210 vmlinux.after
Signed-off-by: Pawan Gupta <pawan.kumar.gupta@linux.intel.com>
---
arch/x86/include/asm/nospec-branch.h | 4 ----
1 file changed, 4 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/nospec-branch.h b/arch/x86/include/asm/nospec-branch.h
index aee26bb8230f861dda7a4a568159d4cf77df45f6..c4816719150dce9f5ecc676cdcf38356fc96d166 100644
--- a/arch/x86/include/asm/nospec-branch.h
+++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/nospec-branch.h
@@ -434,12 +434,8 @@ static inline void call_depth_return_thunk(void) {}
* Inline asm uses the %V modifier which is only in newer GCC
* which is ensured when CONFIG_MITIGATION_RETPOLINE is defined.
*/
-#ifdef CONFIG_MITIGATION_RETPOLINE
#define CALL_NOSPEC __CS_PREFIX("%V[thunk_target]") \
"call __x86_indirect_thunk_%V[thunk_target]\n"
-#else
-#define CALL_NOSPEC "call *%[thunk_target]\n"
-#endif
# define THUNK_TARGET(addr) [thunk_target] "r" (addr)
---
base-commit: 4701f33a10702d5fc577c32434eb62adde0a1ae1
change-id: 20250320-call-nospec-extra-ifdef-64b4942e7597
Best regards,
--
Thanks,
Pawan
next reply other threads:[~2025-03-20 18:13 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-03-20 18:13 Pawan Gupta [this message]
2025-03-21 7:15 ` Josh Poimboeuf
2025-03-21 17:03 ` Pawan Gupta
2025-03-25 7:36 ` [tip: x86/urgent] x86/speculation: Remove the extra #ifdef " tip-bot2 for Pawan Gupta
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20250320-call-nospec-extra-ifdef-v1-1-d9b084d24820@linux.intel.com \
--to=pawan.kumar.gupta@linux.intel.com \
--cc=andrew.cooper3@citrix.com \
--cc=jpoimboe@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®