mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Ryo Takakura <ryotkkr98@gmail.com>
To: john.ogness@linutronix.de
Cc: alex@ghiti.fr, aou@eecs.berkeley.edu, gregkh@linuxfoundation.org,
	jirislaby@kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org, linux-serial@vger.kernel.org,
	palmer@dabbelt.com, paul.walmsley@sifive.com, pmladek@suse.com,
	ryotkkr98@gmail.com, samuel.holland@sifive.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] serial: sifive: Switch to nbcon console
Date: Tue, 25 Mar 2025 20:01:07 +0900	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20250325110107.28570-1-ryotkkr98@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <84sen2fo4b.fsf@jogness.linutronix.de>

Hi John,

On Mon, 24 Mar 2025 16:30:20 +0106, John Ogness wrote:
>On 2025-03-23, Ryo Takakura <ryotkkr98@gmail.com> wrote:
>> Add the necessary callbacks(write_atomic, write_thread, device_lock
>> and device_unlock) and CON_NBCON flag to switch the sifive console
>> driver to perform as nbcon console.
>>
>> Both ->write_atomic() and ->write_thread() will check for console
>> ownership whenever they are accessing registers.
>>
>> The ->device_lock()/unlock() will provide the additional serilization
>> necessary for ->write_thread() which is called from dedicated printing
>> thread.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Ryo Takakura <ryotkkr98@gmail.com>
>
>This driver has the same issue that the 8250 previously had. The
>->startup() and ->shutdown() callbacks are called without the port
>lock. However, the sifive driver is accessing SIFIVE_SERIAL_IE_OFFS in
>these callbacks and this register is also accessed by the ->write()
>callback. This needs to be synchronized.

I see. Thanks for pointing out.
(I didn't know about console_on_rootfs() and what it does. Interesting!)

>The related 8250 patches fixing this are startup [0] and shutdown [1]. I
>am assuming the following change would be sufficient:
>
>diff --git a/drivers/tty/serial/sifive.c b/drivers/tty/serial/sifive.c
>index d032de6199af..1de1b2a5833d 100644
>--- a/drivers/tty/serial/sifive.c
>+++ b/drivers/tty/serial/sifive.c
>@@ -564,8 +564,11 @@ static void sifive_serial_break_ctl(struct uart_port *port, int break_state)
> static int sifive_serial_startup(struct uart_port *port)
> {
>       struct sifive_serial_port *ssp = port_to_sifive_serial_port(port);
>+      unsigned long flags;
>
>+      uart_port_lock_irqsave(&ssp->port, &flags);
>       __ssp_enable_rxwm(ssp);
>+      uart_port_unlock_irqrestore(&ssp->port, flags);
>
>       return 0;
> }
>@@ -573,9 +576,12 @@ static int sifive_serial_startup(struct uart_port *port)
> static void sifive_serial_shutdown(struct uart_port *port)
> {
>       struct sifive_serial_port *ssp = port_to_sifive_serial_port(port);
>+      unsigned long flags;
>
>+      uart_port_lock_irqsave(&ssp->port, &flags);
>       __ssp_disable_rxwm(ssp);
>       __ssp_disable_txwm(ssp);
>+      uart_port_unlock_irqrestore(&ssp->port, flags);
> }
>
> /**
>
>The fix should be applied first (and likely Cc stable) since it is
>fixing an existing mainline problem.

Ok, I will add a patch in the next version and cc stable.

>Your patch also needs the synchronization. The ->write_atomic() callback
>does not use the port lock. However, the uart_port_*() functions also
>take the nbcon console ownership, so they synchronize against
>->write_atomic() callbacks.

I see, nice!

>Otherwise, this patch looks good. If the ->startup() and ->shutdown()
>callbacks are fixed in a previous patch, feel free to add:
>
>Reviewed-by: John Ogness <john.ogness@linutronix.de>
>
>to this patch.

I'll add in the next verison.
Thanks for reviewing!

Sincerely,
Ryo Takakura

>John Ogness
>
>[0] https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20230525093159.223817-2-john.ogness@linutronix.de
>[1] https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20230525093159.223817-9-john.ogness@linutronix.de

      reply	other threads:[~2025-03-25 11:01 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-03-23  6:06 Ryo Takakura
2025-03-24 15:24 ` John Ogness
2025-03-25 11:01   ` Ryo Takakura [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20250325110107.28570-1-ryotkkr98@gmail.com \
    --to=ryotkkr98@gmail.com \
    --cc=alex@ghiti.fr \
    --cc=aou@eecs.berkeley.edu \
    --cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
    --cc=jirislaby@kernel.org \
    --cc=john.ogness@linutronix.de \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-serial@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=palmer@dabbelt.com \
    --cc=paul.walmsley@sifive.com \
    --cc=pmladek@suse.com \
    --cc=samuel.holland@sifive.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®