mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Maxime Ripard <mripard@kernel.org>
To: "Maíra Canal" <mcanal@igalia.com>
Cc: Dave Stevenson <dave.stevenson@raspberrypi.com>,
	 Raspberry Pi Kernel Maintenance <kernel-list@raspberrypi.com>,
	Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com>,
	 Thomas Zimmermann <tzimmermann@suse.de>,
	David Airlie <airlied@gmail.com>,
	 Simona Vetter <simona@ffwll.ch>,
	dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/4] drm/vc4: tests: Stop allocating the state in test init
Date: Fri, 28 Mar 2025 16:32:59 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20250328-radiant-azure-falcon-aafcf3@houat> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <ad77e39d-4862-4e04-87a0-2a6a2682d5c9@igalia.com>

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 2202 bytes --]

On Sun, Mar 23, 2025 at 03:48:17PM -0300, Maíra Canal wrote:
> Hi Maxime,
> 
> On 18/03/25 11:17, Maxime Ripard wrote:
> > The vc4-pv-muxing-combinations and vc5-pv-muxing-combinations test
> > suites use a common test init function which, in part, allocates the
> > drm atomic state the test will use.
> > 
> > That allocation relies on  drm_kunit_helper_atomic_state_alloc(), and
> > thus requires a struct drm_modeset_acquire_ctx. This context will then
> > be stored in the allocated state->acquire_ctx field.
> > 
> > However, the context is local to the test init function, and is cleared
> > as soon as drm_kunit_helper_atomic_state_alloc() is done. We thus end up
> > with an dangling pointer to a cleared context in state->acquire_ctx for
> > our test to consumes.
> > 
> > We should really allocate the context and the state in the test
> > functions, so we can also control when we're done with it.
> > 
> > Fixes: 30188df0c387 ("drm/tests: Drop drm_kunit_helper_acquire_ctx_alloc()")
> > Signed-off-by: Maxime Ripard <mripard@kernel.org>
> > ---
> >   drivers/gpu/drm/vc4/tests/vc4_test_pv_muxing.c | 41 +++++++++++++++++---------
> >   1 file changed, 27 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-)
> > 
> > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/vc4/tests/vc4_test_pv_muxing.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/vc4/tests/vc4_test_pv_muxing.c
> > index 992e8f5c5c6ea8d92338a8fe739fa1115ff85338..52c04ef33206bf4f9e21e3c8b7cea932824a67fa 100644
> > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/vc4/tests/vc4_test_pv_muxing.c
> > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/vc4/tests/vc4_test_pv_muxing.c
> > @@ -18,11 +18,10 @@
> >   #include "vc4_mock.h"
> >   struct pv_muxing_priv {
> >   	struct vc4_dev *vc4;
> > -	struct drm_atomic_state *state;
> 
> Can't we add `struct drm_modeset_acquire_ctx` here? Then, we can be sure
> that the context exists during the entire test case.
> 
> Also, we can add `drm_modeset_drop_locks()` and
> `drm_modeset_acquire_fini()` to a exit function in the kunit suite.

That's what we were doing before, but the kunit functions and exit
functions are run in a separate thread by design, which then cause
lockdep to complain.

It's not great, but we can't really change either :/

Maxime

[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 228 bytes --]

  reply	other threads:[~2025-03-28 15:33 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-03-18 14:17 [PATCH 0/4] drm/vc4: tests: Fix locking failures Maxime Ripard
2025-03-18 14:17 ` [PATCH 1/4] drm/vc4: tests: Use return instead of assert Maxime Ripard
2025-03-23 18:12   ` Maíra Canal
2025-03-18 14:17 ` [PATCH 2/4] drm/vc4: tests: Document output handling functions Maxime Ripard
2025-03-23 18:34   ` Maíra Canal
2025-03-28 15:30     ` Maxime Ripard
2025-03-18 14:17 ` [PATCH 3/4] drm/vc4: tests: Stop allocating the state in test init Maxime Ripard
2025-03-23 18:48   ` Maíra Canal
2025-03-28 15:32     ` Maxime Ripard [this message]
2025-03-30 18:10       ` Maíra Canal
2025-03-18 14:17 ` [PATCH 4/4] drm/vc4: tests: Retry pv-muxing tests when EDEADLK Maxime Ripard
2025-03-23 18:07   ` Maíra Canal

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20250328-radiant-azure-falcon-aafcf3@houat \
    --to=mripard@kernel.org \
    --cc=airlied@gmail.com \
    --cc=dave.stevenson@raspberrypi.com \
    --cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=kernel-list@raspberrypi.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=mcanal@igalia.com \
    --cc=simona@ffwll.ch \
    --cc=tzimmermann@suse.de \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®