From: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.cz>
To: cve@kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: linux-cve-announce@vger.kernel.org,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
Subject: Re: CVE-2022-49761: btrfs: always report error in run_one_delayed_ref()
Date: Mon, 31 Mar 2025 20:03:17 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20250331180316.GJ32661@suse.cz> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <2025032703-CVE-2022-49761-9b1e@gregkh>
On Thu, Mar 27, 2025 at 05:43:19PM +0100, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> Description
> ===========
>
> In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
>
> btrfs: always report error in run_one_delayed_ref()
>
> Currently we have a btrfs_debug() for run_one_delayed_ref() failure, but
> if end users hit such problem, there will be no chance that
> btrfs_debug() is enabled. This can lead to very little useful info for
> debugging.
>
> This patch will:
>
> - Add extra info for error reporting
> Including:
> * logical bytenr
> * num_bytes
> * type
> * action
> * ref_mod
>
> - Replace the btrfs_debug() with btrfs_err()
>
> - Move the error reporting into run_one_delayed_ref()
> This is to avoid use-after-free, the @node can be freed in the caller.
>
> This error should only be triggered at most once.
>
> As if run_one_delayed_ref() failed, we trigger the error message, then
> causing the call chain to error out:
>
> btrfs_run_delayed_refs()
> `- btrfs_run_delayed_refs()
> `- btrfs_run_delayed_refs_for_head()
> `- run_one_delayed_ref()
>
> And we will abort the current transaction in btrfs_run_delayed_refs().
> If we have to run delayed refs for the abort transaction,
> run_one_delayed_ref() will just cleanup the refs and do nothing, thus no
> new error messages would be output.
>
> The Linux kernel CVE team has assigned CVE-2022-49761 to this issue.
I'm disputing this CVE, there is no vulnerability. The code moves a
debugging print and makes it a more verbose error but does not have any
other functional change. Specifically it does not extend error handling
in any sensible way.
There is no apparent _vulnerability_, the patch was in stable likely
because it adds some user convenience, but thre's no Fixes nor CC:stable
tags so it was probably picked by AUTOSEL. Please reject the CVE, thanks.
next parent reply other threads:[~2025-03-31 18:03 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <2025032703-CVE-2022-49761-9b1e@gregkh>
2025-03-31 18:03 ` David Sterba [this message]
2025-03-31 19:43 ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20250331180316.GJ32661@suse.cz \
--to=dsterba@suse.cz \
--cc=cve@kernel.org \
--cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=linux-cve-announce@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®