From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from perceval.ideasonboard.com (perceval.ideasonboard.com [213.167.242.64]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1A82E1F2BBB; Wed, 2 Apr 2025 12:46:30 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=213.167.242.64 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1743597992; cv=none; b=tBbXt+SAeuCIQTRqWdRBkOX+gOgAcES4Y0WnDvD8/h3ocfOx2p6B3msvNuUsF3rSf9LYumPcBmd3XIyDELgSJ8lzjFefya+dP9yNTizZtDn4KBiu3EHi3q8Ue0PSHHbJodMvQsKoZH4nuPI6jfkKvAJIexcDLxkU3IDaZGAVuwA= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1743597992; c=relaxed/simple; bh=RKR7bdFOIqZEt3jCxHjv6sy16GgjixF70npH2yYLpT4=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=jTJOWMwYg0SP69GtC5+dwm2KoW4qMSaMIAGK6/YZOqnDPmZFWWsWmguFVcr0YM2pxwAdRY4qOT14ytKPDzWYzkhno8j8aaU7ZQ/BpaiONm4XjXw3NRgWsAQdCa7jqSicGXJtxEGKnHVA3LcrjCx5GkeKL+0AEIeGSwzwEW5VSAA= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=ideasonboard.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=ideasonboard.com; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=ideasonboard.com header.i=@ideasonboard.com header.b=QNtZlNBd; arc=none smtp.client-ip=213.167.242.64 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=ideasonboard.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=ideasonboard.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=ideasonboard.com header.i=@ideasonboard.com header.b="QNtZlNBd" Received: from pendragon.ideasonboard.com (81-175-209-231.bb.dnainternet.fi [81.175.209.231]) by perceval.ideasonboard.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 54DD063B; Wed, 2 Apr 2025 14:44:36 +0200 (CEST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=ideasonboard.com; s=mail; t=1743597876; bh=RKR7bdFOIqZEt3jCxHjv6sy16GgjixF70npH2yYLpT4=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=QNtZlNBdhWzgbnPNmjZAGDVOjcS6jPWoPqm1ufjEOBIkoSy/PwZtoyRRx4Wq7xJzT xuz3GbCZAn9Iqdl50ekcFBrdFZmb9JiLYnc5hXRMoWa8bYXn+IlSLLo1O+JwiG23PH 4rjsXGs5pFQPXXkAFprHyoluTHqV3xPko5etj7Ic= Date: Wed, 2 Apr 2025 15:46:05 +0300 From: Laurent Pinchart To: Krzysztof Kozlowski Cc: Benjamin Mugnier , Sylvain Petinot , Mauro Carvalho Chehab , Rob Herring , Krzysztof Kozlowski , Conor Dooley , Sakari Ailus , linux-media@vger.kernel.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] media: dt-bindings: Add ST VD55G1 camera sensor binding Message-ID: <20250402124605.GB13181@pendragon.ideasonboard.com> References: <20250401-b4-vd55g1-v2-0-0c8ab8a48c55@foss.st.com> <20250401-b4-vd55g1-v2-1-0c8ab8a48c55@foss.st.com> <20250402-curvy-seriema-of-blizzard-b1c4d9@krzk-bin> <228ddf41-e1d0-4d06-9e0e-9e0dad841688@foss.st.com> <7d501bf2-a017-4c02-a96f-184a7d648b6a@foss.st.com> <9f128ce9-6a26-435c-b133-0da80120de2d@kernel.org> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <9f128ce9-6a26-435c-b133-0da80120de2d@kernel.org> On Wed, Apr 02, 2025 at 12:27:08PM +0200, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote: > On 02/04/2025 11:41, Benjamin Mugnier wrote: > > On 4/2/25 11:38, Benjamin Mugnier wrote: > >> On 4/2/25 11:11, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote: > >>> On 02/04/2025 10:34, Benjamin Mugnier wrote: > >>>> Hi Krzysztof, > >>>> > >>>> On 4/2/25 09:08, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote: > >>>>> On Tue, Apr 01, 2025 at 01:05:58PM +0200, Benjamin Mugnier wrote: > >>>>>> + properties: > >>>>>> + endpoint: > >>>>>> + $ref: /schemas/media/video-interfaces.yaml# > >>>>>> + unevaluatedProperties: false > >>>>>> + > >>>>>> + properties: > >>>>>> + data-lanes: > >>>>>> + items: > >>>>>> + const: 1 > >>>>> > >>>>> Not what I asked. Now you miss number of items. Just use the syntax I > >>>>> proposed. Or was there any issue with it? > >>>> > >>>> No issue I just misunderstood and thought const: 1 was impliying > >>>> maxItems: 1. I'll add maxItems back. > >>> > >>> That's just longer way to express what I asked for. So I repeat the > >>> question: why not using the syntax I asked for? > >> > >> I guess I didn't understand what you asked for. > >> May I ask you to write it ? That will help me a lot. > > > > By 'it' I mean the binding. > > I wrote it last time. I don't think that copying the same here would > change anything. If I can look at v1, you can do as well. Reading your comment on v1, I would have come up with the exact same result as Benjamin's v2. I can't figure out what alternative description you meant. -- Regards, Laurent Pinchart