From: Maxime Ripard <mripard@kernel.org>
To: "Dave Stevenson" <dave.stevenson@raspberrypi.com>,
"Maíra Canal" <mcanal@igalia.com>,
"Raspberry Pi Kernel Maintenance" <kernel-list@raspberrypi.com>,
"Maarten Lankhorst" <maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com>,
"Thomas Zimmermann" <tzimmermann@suse.de>,
"David Airlie" <airlied@gmail.com>,
"Simona Vetter" <simona@ffwll.ch>
Cc: dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Maxime Ripard <mripard@kernel.org>
Subject: [PATCH v2 1/4] drm/vc4: tests: Use return instead of assert
Date: Thu, 03 Apr 2025 15:33:30 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20250403-drm-vc4-kunit-failures-v2-1-e09195cc8840@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250403-drm-vc4-kunit-failures-v2-0-e09195cc8840@kernel.org>
The vc4_mock_atomic_add_output() and vc4_mock_atomic_del_output() assert
that the functions they are calling didn't fail. Since some of them can
return EDEADLK, we can't properly deal with it.
Since both functions are expected to return an int, and all caller check
the return value, let's just properly propagate the errors when they
occur.
Fixes: f759f5b53f1c ("drm/vc4: tests: Introduce a mocking infrastructure")
Fixes: 76ec18dc5afa ("drm/vc4: tests: Add unit test suite for the PV muxing")
Reviewed-by: Maíra Canal <mcanal@igalia.com>
Signed-off-by: Maxime Ripard <mripard@kernel.org>
---
drivers/gpu/drm/vc4/tests/vc4_mock_output.c | 36 +++++++++++++++++++----------
1 file changed, 24 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/vc4/tests/vc4_mock_output.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/vc4/tests/vc4_mock_output.c
index e70d7c3076acf168782c48301f3b3dfb9be21f22..f0ddc223c1f839e8a14f37fdcbb72e7b2c836aa1 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/vc4/tests/vc4_mock_output.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/vc4/tests/vc4_mock_output.c
@@ -73,28 +73,34 @@ int vc4_mock_atomic_add_output(struct kunit *test,
struct drm_encoder *encoder;
struct drm_crtc *crtc;
int ret;
encoder = vc4_find_encoder_by_type(drm, type);
- KUNIT_ASSERT_NOT_ERR_OR_NULL(test, encoder);
+ if (!encoder)
+ return -ENODEV;
crtc = vc4_find_crtc_for_encoder(test, drm, encoder);
- KUNIT_ASSERT_NOT_ERR_OR_NULL(test, crtc);
+ if (!crtc)
+ return -ENODEV;
output = encoder_to_vc4_dummy_output(encoder);
conn = &output->connector;
conn_state = drm_atomic_get_connector_state(state, conn);
- KUNIT_ASSERT_NOT_ERR_OR_NULL(test, conn_state);
+ if (IS_ERR(conn_state))
+ return PTR_ERR(conn_state);
ret = drm_atomic_set_crtc_for_connector(conn_state, crtc);
- KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, ret, 0);
+ if (ret)
+ return ret;
crtc_state = drm_atomic_get_crtc_state(state, crtc);
- KUNIT_ASSERT_NOT_ERR_OR_NULL(test, crtc_state);
+ if (IS_ERR(crtc_state))
+ return PTR_ERR(crtc_state);
ret = drm_atomic_set_mode_for_crtc(crtc_state, &default_mode);
- KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, ret, 0);
+ if (ret)
+ return ret;
crtc_state->active = true;
return 0;
}
@@ -111,28 +117,34 @@ int vc4_mock_atomic_del_output(struct kunit *test,
struct drm_encoder *encoder;
struct drm_crtc *crtc;
int ret;
encoder = vc4_find_encoder_by_type(drm, type);
- KUNIT_ASSERT_NOT_ERR_OR_NULL(test, encoder);
+ if (!encoder)
+ return -ENODEV;
crtc = vc4_find_crtc_for_encoder(test, drm, encoder);
- KUNIT_ASSERT_NOT_ERR_OR_NULL(test, crtc);
+ if (!crtc)
+ return -ENODEV;
crtc_state = drm_atomic_get_crtc_state(state, crtc);
- KUNIT_ASSERT_NOT_ERR_OR_NULL(test, crtc_state);
+ if (IS_ERR(crtc_state))
+ return PTR_ERR(crtc_state);
crtc_state->active = false;
ret = drm_atomic_set_mode_for_crtc(crtc_state, NULL);
- KUNIT_ASSERT_EQ(test, ret, 0);
+ if (ret)
+ return ret;
output = encoder_to_vc4_dummy_output(encoder);
conn = &output->connector;
conn_state = drm_atomic_get_connector_state(state, conn);
- KUNIT_ASSERT_NOT_ERR_OR_NULL(test, conn_state);
+ if (IS_ERR(conn_state))
+ return PTR_ERR(conn_state);
ret = drm_atomic_set_crtc_for_connector(conn_state, NULL);
- KUNIT_ASSERT_EQ(test, ret, 0);
+ if (ret)
+ return ret;
return 0;
}
--
2.49.0
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-04-03 13:33 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-04-03 13:33 [PATCH v2 0/4] drm/vc4: tests: Fix locking failures Maxime Ripard
2025-04-03 13:33 ` Maxime Ripard [this message]
2025-04-03 13:33 ` [PATCH v2 2/4] drm/vc4: tests: Document output handling functions Maxime Ripard
2025-04-05 18:07 ` Maíra Canal
2025-04-03 13:33 ` [PATCH v2 3/4] drm/vc4: tests: Stop allocating the state in test init Maxime Ripard
2025-04-03 13:33 ` [PATCH v2 4/4] drm/vc4: tests: Retry pv-muxing tests when EDEADLK Maxime Ripard
2025-04-05 18:06 ` Maíra Canal
2025-04-07 8:34 ` [PATCH v2 0/4] drm/vc4: tests: Fix locking failures Maxime Ripard
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20250403-drm-vc4-kunit-failures-v2-1-e09195cc8840@kernel.org \
--to=mripard@kernel.org \
--cc=airlied@gmail.com \
--cc=dave.stevenson@raspberrypi.com \
--cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=kernel-list@raspberrypi.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com \
--cc=mcanal@igalia.com \
--cc=simona@ffwll.ch \
--cc=tzimmermann@suse.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®