From: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@linutronix.de>
To: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: "Borislav Petkov" <bp@alien8.de>,
linux-rtc@vger.kernel.org,
"Alexandre Belloni" <alexandre.belloni@bootlin.com>,
"Mateusz Jończyk" <mat.jonczyk@o2.pl>,
lkml <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
"Anna-Maria Behnsen" <anna-maria@linutronix.de>,
"Frederic Weisbecker" <frederic@kernel.org>,
"Peter Zijlstra" <peterz@infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [ BUG: Invalid wait context ] rtc_lock at: mc146818_avoid_UIP
Date: Thu, 3 Apr 2025 15:50:31 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20250403135031.giGKVTEO@linutronix.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <87sempv17b.ffs@tglx>
On 2025-04-03 15:12:08 [+0200], Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> Converting it to a raw lock "fixes" the problem, but RT people will hunt
> you down with a big latency bat.
>
> But this is not related to the commit above and not new.
>
> timekeeping_suspend() has always invoked mach_get_cmos_time() with the
> freeze lock held and mc146818_get_time() has always locked rtc_lock.
>
> I wonder, why this splat hasn't popped before. On RT lockdep should have
> complained forever. Sebastian???
I sure haven't seen it. But it has to.
> Suspend, whether it's suspend to idle or regular suspend, are weird
> contexts as there is no concurrency possible because interrupts are
> disabled and it is guaranteed that there is only a single CPU which is
> operational. The other CPUs are either in a deep idle state or when they
> are on the way back, they serialize on tick_freeze_lock.
>
> So taking the non-raw spinlock in that context is safe, but obviously
> lockdep does not know about that.
>
> Peter, any ideas?
We can tell lockdep that. I will look into this.
> Thanks,
>
> tglx
Sebastian
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-04-03 13:50 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-03-30 11:32 Borislav Petkov
2025-03-30 12:23 ` Mateusz Jończyk
2025-03-30 12:32 ` Mateusz Jończyk
2025-04-03 13:12 ` Thomas Gleixner
2025-04-03 13:50 ` Sebastian Andrzej Siewior [this message]
2025-04-03 19:36 ` Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2025-04-03 20:26 ` Thomas Gleixner
2025-04-04 6:16 ` Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2025-04-04 13:34 ` [PATCH] timekeeping: Add a lockdep override in tick_freeze() Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2025-04-04 18:47 ` Mateusz Jończyk
2025-04-09 19:13 ` Peter Zijlstra
2025-04-09 21:12 ` [tip: timers/urgent] " tip-bot2 for Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2025-05-31 18:27 ` [PATCH] " Chris Bainbridge
2025-05-31 19:16 ` Chris Bainbridge
2025-06-02 19:52 ` Mateusz Jończyk
2025-06-02 20:20 ` [DRAFT PATCH] rtc-cmos: use spin_lock_irqsave in cmos_interrupt Mateusz Jończyk
2025-06-02 21:19 ` Chris Bainbridge
2025-06-03 6:47 ` Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2025-04-03 23:46 ` [ BUG: Invalid wait context ] rtc_lock at: mc146818_avoid_UIP Mateusz Jończyk
2025-04-04 7:39 ` Thomas Gleixner
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20250403135031.giGKVTEO@linutronix.de \
--to=bigeasy@linutronix.de \
--cc=alexandre.belloni@bootlin.com \
--cc=anna-maria@linutronix.de \
--cc=bp@alien8.de \
--cc=frederic@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-rtc@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mat.jonczyk@o2.pl \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®