From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mgamail.intel.com (mgamail.intel.com [192.198.163.9]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6BBB32505BF for ; Thu, 3 Apr 2025 15:11:27 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=192.198.163.9 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1743693089; cv=none; b=ke5P723PRa1+dUyHbYD1BW3yZuUK37AEizsBOPGPs6JtaAZ2qKQAjJ9KzD+4VrIz9SpBF5uy+8yM9p4DmoPivHT4dX8qOosHPB5xNFL0Tpyvxs6t/Y0ll/NRmJOtymLHWn9viIGgd3nyHmZTMo3iHQKWdL1ah5RqC3tF3By+Esg= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1743693089; c=relaxed/simple; bh=pazXNSNFRwcbem0gEd5+HAWBBg0Pc62HTCAJjOo1360=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=TPuupLEAWahaiyLtWJfccAaZ2wWb61NQCWnLGBwLtoKhNiiLsZJDzhGQ0czrw/3qFt47CPIaObsKXaDj/RA9k7bamBZ1uOYYHryfXSIRBa603+f2LdkVksB44axFMKHEV/PJ1v7TQSGK+5khCufxITArtzGz9b+mVWnq0umQsJE= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=intel.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=intel.com; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=intel.com header.i=@intel.com header.b=Hp2b9VfH; arc=none smtp.client-ip=192.198.163.9 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=intel.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=intel.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=intel.com header.i=@intel.com header.b="Hp2b9VfH" DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=intel.com; i=@intel.com; q=dns/txt; s=Intel; t=1743693088; x=1775229088; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references: mime-version:in-reply-to; bh=pazXNSNFRwcbem0gEd5+HAWBBg0Pc62HTCAJjOo1360=; b=Hp2b9VfHDx22SRBlSA7V83YRaF4PMtoErMOrVxH5xeUdZqQeabFUOJmn 9MlN2n7e4RCCa0KMVaEwFE3QD5tV9rPhEvGM5rESTlgE5A5n+tDa5eqJB ggCDsRLFlXgnHFd4mp+MhWEhFEZgBLdTVy1WLxLZRTsPUHTHQ3N51PLbE W5NGPoq3SviZDt8j9pl/Qb6ugx28Xs9+4+kTvEY6YGwRNyhQZ2kJP+5xt YzQVD2k5k1XwNe1oQjG5KXaCc2naKBFN0R8WpbpYvcvHpqsa7LdLSH+x3 7Pgnmk663wC8OapL/r40PR3qxHFIbQToVYA5/UBuHVcLZuCkX6+NwVhnl A==; X-CSE-ConnectionGUID: 9fhy7RIOTLCy95UKGLOc0Q== X-CSE-MsgGUID: X/KQEsIGTC+xEPdcJFgFTg== X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="6700,10204,11393"; a="55738647" X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.15,184,1739865600"; d="scan'208";a="55738647" Received: from orviesa005.jf.intel.com ([10.64.159.145]) by fmvoesa103.fm.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 03 Apr 2025 08:11:25 -0700 X-CSE-ConnectionGUID: TzyCgRpwS9Ci2czWVDkHYw== X-CSE-MsgGUID: ihRpxO2bRmmQt9iUym/Wvg== X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.15,184,1739865600"; d="scan'208";a="132242656" Received: from lkp-server01.sh.intel.com (HELO b207828170a5) ([10.239.97.150]) by orviesa005.jf.intel.com with ESMTP; 03 Apr 2025 08:11:22 -0700 Received: from kbuild by b207828170a5 with local (Exim 4.96) (envelope-from ) id 1u0MDu-0000V7-2v; Thu, 03 Apr 2025 15:11:18 +0000 Date: Thu, 3 Apr 2025 23:11:12 +0800 From: kernel test robot To: "yohan.joung" , jaegeuk@kernel.org, chao@kernel.org Cc: oe-kbuild-all@lists.linux.dev, linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, pilhyun.kim@sk.com, yohan.joung@sk.com Subject: Re: [PATCH v4] f2fs: prevent the current section from being selected as a victim during GC Message-ID: <202504032206.xzJoHkRX-lkp@intel.com> References: <20250403071016.2940-1-yohan.joung@sk.com> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20250403071016.2940-1-yohan.joung@sk.com> Hi yohan.joung, kernel test robot noticed the following build errors: [auto build test ERROR on jaegeuk-f2fs/dev-test] [also build test ERROR on jaegeuk-f2fs/dev linus/master v6.14 next-20250403] [If your patch is applied to the wrong git tree, kindly drop us a note. And when submitting patch, we suggest to use '--base' as documented in https://git-scm.com/docs/git-format-patch#_base_tree_information] url: https://github.com/intel-lab-lkp/linux/commits/yohan-joung/f2fs-prevent-the-current-section-from-being-selected-as-a-victim-during-GC/20250403-151057 base: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/jaegeuk/f2fs.git dev-test patch link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20250403071016.2940-1-yohan.joung%40sk.com patch subject: [PATCH v4] f2fs: prevent the current section from being selected as a victim during GC config: i386-buildonly-randconfig-005-20250403 (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20250403/202504032206.xzJoHkRX-lkp@intel.com/config) compiler: gcc-12 (Debian 12.2.0-14) 12.2.0 reproduce (this is a W=1 build): (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20250403/202504032206.xzJoHkRX-lkp@intel.com/reproduce) If you fix the issue in a separate patch/commit (i.e. not just a new version of the same patch/commit), kindly add following tags | Reported-by: kernel test robot | Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-kbuild-all/202504032206.xzJoHkRX-lkp@intel.com/ All errors (new ones prefixed by >>): In file included from fs/f2fs/checkpoint.c:20: fs/f2fs/segment.h: In function '__set_test_and_free': >> fs/f2fs/segment.h:480:81: error: macro "GET_SEC_FROM_SEG" requires 2 arguments, but only 1 given 480 | if (GET_SEC_FROM_SEG(sbi->next_victim_seg[BG_GC]) == secno) | ^ fs/f2fs/segment.h:105: note: macro "GET_SEC_FROM_SEG" defined here 105 | #define GET_SEC_FROM_SEG(sbi, segno) \ | >> fs/f2fs/segment.h:480:37: error: 'GET_SEC_FROM_SEG' undeclared (first use in this function) 480 | if (GET_SEC_FROM_SEG(sbi->next_victim_seg[BG_GC]) == secno) | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ fs/f2fs/segment.h:480:37: note: each undeclared identifier is reported only once for each function it appears in fs/f2fs/segment.h:483:81: error: macro "GET_SEC_FROM_SEG" requires 2 arguments, but only 1 given 483 | if (GET_SEC_FROM_SEG(sbi->next_victim_seg[FG_GC]) == secno) | ^ fs/f2fs/segment.h:105: note: macro "GET_SEC_FROM_SEG" defined here 105 | #define GET_SEC_FROM_SEG(sbi, segno) \ | vim +/GET_SEC_FROM_SEG +480 fs/f2fs/segment.h 458 459 static inline void __set_test_and_free(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi, 460 unsigned int segno, bool inmem) 461 { 462 struct free_segmap_info *free_i = FREE_I(sbi); 463 unsigned int secno = GET_SEC_FROM_SEG(sbi, segno); 464 unsigned int start_segno = GET_SEG_FROM_SEC(sbi, secno); 465 unsigned int next; 466 unsigned int usable_segs = f2fs_usable_segs_in_sec(sbi); 467 468 spin_lock(&free_i->segmap_lock); 469 if (test_and_clear_bit(segno, free_i->free_segmap)) { 470 free_i->free_segments++; 471 472 if (!inmem && IS_CURSEC(sbi, secno)) 473 goto skip_free; 474 next = find_next_bit(free_i->free_segmap, 475 start_segno + SEGS_PER_SEC(sbi), start_segno); 476 if (next >= start_segno + usable_segs) { 477 if (test_and_clear_bit(secno, free_i->free_secmap)) { 478 free_i->free_sections++; 479 > 480 if (GET_SEC_FROM_SEG(sbi->next_victim_seg[BG_GC]) == secno) 481 sbi->next_victim_seg[BG_GC] = NULL_SEGNO; 482 483 if (GET_SEC_FROM_SEG(sbi->next_victim_seg[FG_GC]) == secno) 484 sbi->next_victim_seg[FG_GC] = NULL_SEGNO; 485 } 486 } 487 } 488 skip_free: 489 spin_unlock(&free_i->segmap_lock); 490 } 491 -- 0-DAY CI Kernel Test Service https://github.com/intel/lkp-tests/wiki