mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Andrea Righi <arighi@nvidia.com>
To: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>, David Vernet <void@manifault.com>,
	Changwoo Min <changwoo@igalia.com>
Cc: Joel Fernandes <joelagnelf@nvidia.com>, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH 2/5] sched_ext: idle: Explicitly pass allowed cpumask to scx_select_cpu_dfl()
Date: Sat,  5 Apr 2025 15:39:22 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20250405134041.13778-3-arighi@nvidia.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250405134041.13778-1-arighi@nvidia.com>

Modify scx_select_cpu_dfl() to take the allowed cpumask as an explicit
argument, instead of implicitly using @p->cpus_ptr.

This prepares for future changes where arbitrary cpumasks may be passed
to the built-in idle CPU selection policy.

This is a pure refactoring with no functional changes.

Signed-off-by: Andrea Righi <arighi@nvidia.com>
---
 kernel/sched/ext.c      |  2 +-
 kernel/sched/ext_idle.c | 20 +++++++++++---------
 kernel/sched/ext_idle.h |  3 ++-
 3 files changed, 14 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)

diff --git a/kernel/sched/ext.c b/kernel/sched/ext.c
index 6781e6da059b7..ac3fd7a409e9a 100644
--- a/kernel/sched/ext.c
+++ b/kernel/sched/ext.c
@@ -3392,7 +3392,7 @@ static int select_task_rq_scx(struct task_struct *p, int prev_cpu, int wake_flag
 	} else {
 		s32 cpu;
 
-		cpu = scx_select_cpu_dfl(p, prev_cpu, wake_flags, 0);
+		cpu = scx_select_cpu_dfl(p, prev_cpu, wake_flags, NULL, 0);
 		if (cpu >= 0) {
 			p->scx.slice = SCX_SLICE_DFL;
 			p->scx.ddsp_dsq_id = SCX_DSQ_LOCAL;
diff --git a/kernel/sched/ext_idle.c b/kernel/sched/ext_idle.c
index ed37fb8e45180..5d6253c6ed908 100644
--- a/kernel/sched/ext_idle.c
+++ b/kernel/sched/ext_idle.c
@@ -438,9 +438,11 @@ static inline bool task_affinity_all(const struct task_struct *p)
  * NOTE: tasks that can only run on 1 CPU are excluded by this logic, because
  * we never call ops.select_cpu() for them, see select_task_rq().
  */
-s32 scx_select_cpu_dfl(struct task_struct *p, s32 prev_cpu, u64 wake_flags, u64 flags)
+s32 scx_select_cpu_dfl(struct task_struct *p, s32 prev_cpu, u64 wake_flags,
+		       const struct cpumask *cpus_allowed, u64 flags)
 {
 	const struct cpumask *llc_cpus = NULL, *numa_cpus = NULL;
+	const struct cpumask *allowed = cpus_allowed ?: p->cpus_ptr;
 	int node = scx_cpu_node_if_enabled(prev_cpu);
 	s32 cpu;
 
@@ -460,9 +462,9 @@ s32 scx_select_cpu_dfl(struct task_struct *p, s32 prev_cpu, u64 wake_flags, u64
 		struct cpumask *local_cpus = this_cpu_cpumask_var_ptr(local_numa_idle_cpumask);
 		const struct cpumask *cpus = numa_span(prev_cpu);
 
-		if (task_affinity_all(p))
+		if (allowed == p->cpus_ptr && task_affinity_all(p))
 			numa_cpus = cpus;
-		else if (cpus && cpumask_and(local_cpus, p->cpus_ptr, cpus))
+		else if (cpus && cpumask_and(local_cpus, allowed, cpus))
 			numa_cpus = local_cpus;
 	}
 
@@ -470,9 +472,9 @@ s32 scx_select_cpu_dfl(struct task_struct *p, s32 prev_cpu, u64 wake_flags, u64
 		struct cpumask *local_cpus = this_cpu_cpumask_var_ptr(local_llc_idle_cpumask);
 		const struct cpumask *cpus = llc_span(prev_cpu);
 
-		if (task_affinity_all(p))
+		if (allowed == p->cpus_ptr && task_affinity_all(p))
 			llc_cpus = cpus;
-		else if (cpus && cpumask_and(local_cpus, p->cpus_ptr, cpus))
+		else if (cpus && cpumask_and(local_cpus, allowed, cpus))
 			llc_cpus = local_cpus;
 	}
 
@@ -511,7 +513,7 @@ s32 scx_select_cpu_dfl(struct task_struct *p, s32 prev_cpu, u64 wake_flags, u64
 		    cpu_rq(cpu)->scx.local_dsq.nr == 0 &&
 		    (!(flags & SCX_PICK_IDLE_IN_NODE) || (waker_node == node)) &&
 		    !cpumask_empty(idle_cpumask(waker_node)->cpu)) {
-			if (cpumask_test_cpu(cpu, p->cpus_ptr))
+			if (cpumask_test_cpu(cpu, allowed))
 				goto out_unlock;
 		}
 	}
@@ -556,7 +558,7 @@ s32 scx_select_cpu_dfl(struct task_struct *p, s32 prev_cpu, u64 wake_flags, u64
 		 * begin in prev_cpu's node and proceed to other nodes in
 		 * order of increasing distance.
 		 */
-		cpu = scx_pick_idle_cpu(p->cpus_ptr, node, flags | SCX_PICK_IDLE_CORE);
+		cpu = scx_pick_idle_cpu(allowed, node, flags | SCX_PICK_IDLE_CORE);
 		if (cpu >= 0)
 			goto out_unlock;
 
@@ -604,7 +606,7 @@ s32 scx_select_cpu_dfl(struct task_struct *p, s32 prev_cpu, u64 wake_flags, u64
 	 * in prev_cpu's node and proceed to other nodes in order of
 	 * increasing distance.
 	 */
-	cpu = scx_pick_idle_cpu(p->cpus_ptr, node, flags);
+	cpu = scx_pick_idle_cpu(allowed, node, flags);
 
 out_unlock:
 	rcu_read_unlock();
@@ -858,7 +860,7 @@ __bpf_kfunc s32 scx_bpf_select_cpu_dfl(struct task_struct *p, s32 prev_cpu,
 		goto prev_cpu;
 
 #ifdef CONFIG_SMP
-	cpu = scx_select_cpu_dfl(p, prev_cpu, wake_flags, 0);
+	cpu = scx_select_cpu_dfl(p, prev_cpu, wake_flags, NULL, 0);
 	if (cpu >= 0) {
 		*is_idle = true;
 		return cpu;
diff --git a/kernel/sched/ext_idle.h b/kernel/sched/ext_idle.h
index 511cc2221f7a8..37be78a7502b3 100644
--- a/kernel/sched/ext_idle.h
+++ b/kernel/sched/ext_idle.h
@@ -27,7 +27,8 @@ static inline s32 scx_pick_idle_cpu(const struct cpumask *cpus_allowed, int node
 }
 #endif /* CONFIG_SMP */
 
-s32 scx_select_cpu_dfl(struct task_struct *p, s32 prev_cpu, u64 wake_flags, u64 flags);
+s32 scx_select_cpu_dfl(struct task_struct *p, s32 prev_cpu, u64 wake_flags,
+		       const struct cpumask *cpus_allowed, u64 flags);
 void scx_idle_enable(struct sched_ext_ops *ops);
 void scx_idle_disable(void);
 int scx_idle_init(void);
-- 
2.49.0


  parent reply	other threads:[~2025-04-05 13:41 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-04-05 13:39 [PATCHSET v7] sched_ext: Enhance built-in idle selection with allowed CPUs Andrea Righi
2025-04-05 13:39 ` [PATCH 1/5] sched_ext: idle: Extend topology optimizations to all tasks Andrea Righi
2025-04-05 13:39 ` Andrea Righi [this message]
2025-04-05 13:39 ` [PATCH 3/5] sched_ext: idle: Accept an arbitrary cpumask in scx_select_cpu_dfl() Andrea Righi
2025-04-05 13:39 ` [PATCH 4/5] sched_ext: idle: Introduce scx_bpf_select_cpu_and() Andrea Righi
2025-04-05 13:39 ` [PATCH 5/5] selftests/sched_ext: Add test for scx_bpf_select_cpu_and() Andrea Righi
2025-04-07 17:16 ` [PATCHSET v7] sched_ext: Enhance built-in idle selection with allowed CPUs Tejun Heo

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20250405134041.13778-3-arighi@nvidia.com \
    --to=arighi@nvidia.com \
    --cc=changwoo@igalia.com \
    --cc=joelagnelf@nvidia.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=tj@kernel.org \
    --cc=void@manifault.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®