From: Andrea Righi <arighi@nvidia.com>
To: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>, David Vernet <void@manifault.com>,
Changwoo Min <changwoo@igalia.com>
Cc: Joel Fernandes <joelagnelf@nvidia.com>, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH 2/5] sched_ext: idle: Explicitly pass allowed cpumask to scx_select_cpu_dfl()
Date: Sat, 5 Apr 2025 15:39:22 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20250405134041.13778-3-arighi@nvidia.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250405134041.13778-1-arighi@nvidia.com>
Modify scx_select_cpu_dfl() to take the allowed cpumask as an explicit
argument, instead of implicitly using @p->cpus_ptr.
This prepares for future changes where arbitrary cpumasks may be passed
to the built-in idle CPU selection policy.
This is a pure refactoring with no functional changes.
Signed-off-by: Andrea Righi <arighi@nvidia.com>
---
kernel/sched/ext.c | 2 +-
kernel/sched/ext_idle.c | 20 +++++++++++---------
kernel/sched/ext_idle.h | 3 ++-
3 files changed, 14 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)
diff --git a/kernel/sched/ext.c b/kernel/sched/ext.c
index 6781e6da059b7..ac3fd7a409e9a 100644
--- a/kernel/sched/ext.c
+++ b/kernel/sched/ext.c
@@ -3392,7 +3392,7 @@ static int select_task_rq_scx(struct task_struct *p, int prev_cpu, int wake_flag
} else {
s32 cpu;
- cpu = scx_select_cpu_dfl(p, prev_cpu, wake_flags, 0);
+ cpu = scx_select_cpu_dfl(p, prev_cpu, wake_flags, NULL, 0);
if (cpu >= 0) {
p->scx.slice = SCX_SLICE_DFL;
p->scx.ddsp_dsq_id = SCX_DSQ_LOCAL;
diff --git a/kernel/sched/ext_idle.c b/kernel/sched/ext_idle.c
index ed37fb8e45180..5d6253c6ed908 100644
--- a/kernel/sched/ext_idle.c
+++ b/kernel/sched/ext_idle.c
@@ -438,9 +438,11 @@ static inline bool task_affinity_all(const struct task_struct *p)
* NOTE: tasks that can only run on 1 CPU are excluded by this logic, because
* we never call ops.select_cpu() for them, see select_task_rq().
*/
-s32 scx_select_cpu_dfl(struct task_struct *p, s32 prev_cpu, u64 wake_flags, u64 flags)
+s32 scx_select_cpu_dfl(struct task_struct *p, s32 prev_cpu, u64 wake_flags,
+ const struct cpumask *cpus_allowed, u64 flags)
{
const struct cpumask *llc_cpus = NULL, *numa_cpus = NULL;
+ const struct cpumask *allowed = cpus_allowed ?: p->cpus_ptr;
int node = scx_cpu_node_if_enabled(prev_cpu);
s32 cpu;
@@ -460,9 +462,9 @@ s32 scx_select_cpu_dfl(struct task_struct *p, s32 prev_cpu, u64 wake_flags, u64
struct cpumask *local_cpus = this_cpu_cpumask_var_ptr(local_numa_idle_cpumask);
const struct cpumask *cpus = numa_span(prev_cpu);
- if (task_affinity_all(p))
+ if (allowed == p->cpus_ptr && task_affinity_all(p))
numa_cpus = cpus;
- else if (cpus && cpumask_and(local_cpus, p->cpus_ptr, cpus))
+ else if (cpus && cpumask_and(local_cpus, allowed, cpus))
numa_cpus = local_cpus;
}
@@ -470,9 +472,9 @@ s32 scx_select_cpu_dfl(struct task_struct *p, s32 prev_cpu, u64 wake_flags, u64
struct cpumask *local_cpus = this_cpu_cpumask_var_ptr(local_llc_idle_cpumask);
const struct cpumask *cpus = llc_span(prev_cpu);
- if (task_affinity_all(p))
+ if (allowed == p->cpus_ptr && task_affinity_all(p))
llc_cpus = cpus;
- else if (cpus && cpumask_and(local_cpus, p->cpus_ptr, cpus))
+ else if (cpus && cpumask_and(local_cpus, allowed, cpus))
llc_cpus = local_cpus;
}
@@ -511,7 +513,7 @@ s32 scx_select_cpu_dfl(struct task_struct *p, s32 prev_cpu, u64 wake_flags, u64
cpu_rq(cpu)->scx.local_dsq.nr == 0 &&
(!(flags & SCX_PICK_IDLE_IN_NODE) || (waker_node == node)) &&
!cpumask_empty(idle_cpumask(waker_node)->cpu)) {
- if (cpumask_test_cpu(cpu, p->cpus_ptr))
+ if (cpumask_test_cpu(cpu, allowed))
goto out_unlock;
}
}
@@ -556,7 +558,7 @@ s32 scx_select_cpu_dfl(struct task_struct *p, s32 prev_cpu, u64 wake_flags, u64
* begin in prev_cpu's node and proceed to other nodes in
* order of increasing distance.
*/
- cpu = scx_pick_idle_cpu(p->cpus_ptr, node, flags | SCX_PICK_IDLE_CORE);
+ cpu = scx_pick_idle_cpu(allowed, node, flags | SCX_PICK_IDLE_CORE);
if (cpu >= 0)
goto out_unlock;
@@ -604,7 +606,7 @@ s32 scx_select_cpu_dfl(struct task_struct *p, s32 prev_cpu, u64 wake_flags, u64
* in prev_cpu's node and proceed to other nodes in order of
* increasing distance.
*/
- cpu = scx_pick_idle_cpu(p->cpus_ptr, node, flags);
+ cpu = scx_pick_idle_cpu(allowed, node, flags);
out_unlock:
rcu_read_unlock();
@@ -858,7 +860,7 @@ __bpf_kfunc s32 scx_bpf_select_cpu_dfl(struct task_struct *p, s32 prev_cpu,
goto prev_cpu;
#ifdef CONFIG_SMP
- cpu = scx_select_cpu_dfl(p, prev_cpu, wake_flags, 0);
+ cpu = scx_select_cpu_dfl(p, prev_cpu, wake_flags, NULL, 0);
if (cpu >= 0) {
*is_idle = true;
return cpu;
diff --git a/kernel/sched/ext_idle.h b/kernel/sched/ext_idle.h
index 511cc2221f7a8..37be78a7502b3 100644
--- a/kernel/sched/ext_idle.h
+++ b/kernel/sched/ext_idle.h
@@ -27,7 +27,8 @@ static inline s32 scx_pick_idle_cpu(const struct cpumask *cpus_allowed, int node
}
#endif /* CONFIG_SMP */
-s32 scx_select_cpu_dfl(struct task_struct *p, s32 prev_cpu, u64 wake_flags, u64 flags);
+s32 scx_select_cpu_dfl(struct task_struct *p, s32 prev_cpu, u64 wake_flags,
+ const struct cpumask *cpus_allowed, u64 flags);
void scx_idle_enable(struct sched_ext_ops *ops);
void scx_idle_disable(void);
int scx_idle_init(void);
--
2.49.0
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-04-05 13:41 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-04-05 13:39 [PATCHSET v7] sched_ext: Enhance built-in idle selection with allowed CPUs Andrea Righi
2025-04-05 13:39 ` [PATCH 1/5] sched_ext: idle: Extend topology optimizations to all tasks Andrea Righi
2025-04-05 13:39 ` Andrea Righi [this message]
2025-04-05 13:39 ` [PATCH 3/5] sched_ext: idle: Accept an arbitrary cpumask in scx_select_cpu_dfl() Andrea Righi
2025-04-05 13:39 ` [PATCH 4/5] sched_ext: idle: Introduce scx_bpf_select_cpu_and() Andrea Righi
2025-04-05 13:39 ` [PATCH 5/5] selftests/sched_ext: Add test for scx_bpf_select_cpu_and() Andrea Righi
2025-04-07 17:16 ` [PATCHSET v7] sched_ext: Enhance built-in idle selection with allowed CPUs Tejun Heo
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20250405134041.13778-3-arighi@nvidia.com \
--to=arighi@nvidia.com \
--cc=changwoo@igalia.com \
--cc=joelagnelf@nvidia.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=tj@kernel.org \
--cc=void@manifault.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®