From: Daniel Wagner <wagi@kernel.org>
To: James Smart <james.smart@broadcom.com>,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>, Sagi Grimberg <sagi@grimberg.me>,
Chaitanya Kulkarni <kch@nvidia.com>
Cc: Hannes Reinecke <hare@suse.de>, Keith Busch <kbusch@kernel.org>,
linux-nvme@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Daniel Wagner <wagi@kernel.org>
Subject: [PATCH v4 11/14] nvmet-fcloop: drop response if targetport is gone
Date: Thu, 10 Apr 2025 13:41:14 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20250410-nvmet-fcloop-v4-11-7e5c42b7b2cb@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250410-nvmet-fcloop-v4-0-7e5c42b7b2cb@kernel.org>
When the target port is gone, the lsrsp pointer is invalid. Thus don't
call the done function anymore instead just drop the response.
This happens when the target sends a disconnect association. After this
the target starts tearing down all resources and doesn't expect any
response.
Signed-off-by: Daniel Wagner <wagi@kernel.org>
---
drivers/nvme/target/fcloop.c | 19 ++++++++++++++-----
1 file changed, 14 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/nvme/target/fcloop.c b/drivers/nvme/target/fcloop.c
index ca11230bffedb0f2313a99e24e54e892daf0d644..bb45721ec0f028399d810cbd7891bc6975801752 100644
--- a/drivers/nvme/target/fcloop.c
+++ b/drivers/nvme/target/fcloop.c
@@ -493,16 +493,25 @@ fcloop_t2h_xmt_ls_rsp(struct nvme_fc_local_port *localport,
struct nvmet_fc_target_port *targetport = rport->targetport;
struct fcloop_tport *tport;
- memcpy(lsreq->rspaddr, lsrsp->rspbuf,
- ((lsreq->rsplen < lsrsp->rsplen) ?
- lsreq->rsplen : lsrsp->rsplen));
- lsrsp->done(lsrsp);
-
if (!targetport) {
+ /*
+ * The target port is gone. The target doesn't expect any
+ * response anymore and the ->done call is not valid
+ * because the resources have been freed by
+ * nvmet_fc_free_pending_reqs.
+ *
+ * We end up here from delete association exchange:
+ * nvmet_fc_xmt_disconnect_assoc sends an async request.
+ */
kmem_cache_free(lsreq_cache, tls_req);
return 0;
}
+ memcpy(lsreq->rspaddr, lsrsp->rspbuf,
+ ((lsreq->rsplen < lsrsp->rsplen) ?
+ lsreq->rsplen : lsrsp->rsplen));
+ lsrsp->done(lsrsp);
+
tport = targetport->private;
spin_lock(&tport->lock);
list_add_tail(&tls_req->ls_list, &tport->ls_list);
--
2.49.0
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-04-10 11:41 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-04-10 11:41 [PATCH v4 00/14] nvmet-fcloop: track resources via reference counting Daniel Wagner
2025-04-10 11:41 ` [PATCH v4 01/14] nvmet-fcloop: track ref counts for nports Daniel Wagner
2025-04-10 11:41 ` [PATCH v4 02/14] nvmet-fcloop: remove nport from list on last user Daniel Wagner
2025-04-10 11:41 ` [PATCH v4 03/14] nvmet-fcloop: refactor fcloop_nport_alloc and track lport Daniel Wagner
2025-04-10 11:41 ` [PATCH v4 04/14] nvmet-fcloop: refactor fcloop_delete_local_port Daniel Wagner
2025-04-10 11:41 ` [PATCH v4 05/14] nvmet-fcloop: update refs on tfcp_req Daniel Wagner
2025-04-10 11:41 ` [PATCH v4 06/14] nvmet-fcloop: add missing fcloop_callback_host_done Daniel Wagner
2025-04-10 11:41 ` [PATCH v4 07/14] nvmet-fcloop: access fcpreq only when holding reqlock Daniel Wagner
2025-04-10 11:41 ` [PATCH v4 08/14] nvmet-fcloop: prevent double port deletion Daniel Wagner
2025-04-10 11:41 ` [PATCH v4 09/14] nvmet-fcloop: allocate/free fcloop_lsreq directly Daniel Wagner
2025-04-10 11:41 ` [PATCH v4 10/14] nvmet-fcloop: don't wait for lport cleanup Daniel Wagner
2025-04-10 11:41 ` Daniel Wagner [this message]
2025-04-10 11:41 ` [PATCH v4 12/14] nvmet-fc: free pending reqs on tgtport unregister Daniel Wagner
2025-04-10 11:41 ` [PATCH v4 13/14] nvmet-fc: take tgtport refs for portentry Daniel Wagner
2025-04-10 11:41 ` [PATCH v4 14/14] nvme-fc: do not reference lsrsp after failure Daniel Wagner
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20250410-nvmet-fcloop-v4-11-7e5c42b7b2cb@kernel.org \
--to=wagi@kernel.org \
--cc=hare@suse.de \
--cc=hch@lst.de \
--cc=james.smart@broadcom.com \
--cc=kbusch@kernel.org \
--cc=kch@nvidia.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-nvme@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=sagi@grimberg.me \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®