mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jason Andryuk <jason.andryuk@amd.com>
To: Juergen Gross <jgross@suse.com>,
	Boris Ostrovsky <boris.ostrovsky@oracle.com>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
	"Ingo Molnar" <mingo@redhat.com>, Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>,
	Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>, <x86@kernel.org>,
	"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>,
	"Xin Li (Intel)" <xin@zytor.com>
Cc: Jason Andryuk <jason.andryuk@amd.com>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>, <xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org>,
	<linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: [PATCH] x86/xen: Fix __xen_hypercall_setfunc
Date: Thu, 10 Apr 2025 15:31:05 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20250410193106.16353-1-jason.andryuk@amd.com> (raw)

Hypercall detection is failing with xen_hypercall_intel() chosen even on
an AMD processor.  Looking at the disassembly, the call to
xen_get_vendor() was removed.

The check for boot_cpu_has(X86_FEATURE_CPUID) was used as a proxy for
the x86_vendor having been set.  When
CONFIG_X86_REQUIRED_FEATURE_CPUID=y (the default value), DCE eliminates
the call to xen_get_vendor().  An uninitialized value 0 means
X86_VENDOR_INTEL, so the Intel function is always returned.

Remove the if and always call xen_get_vendor() to avoid this issue.

Fixes: 3d37d9396eb3 ("x86/cpufeatures: Add {REQUIRED,DISABLED} feature configs")
Suggested-by: Juergen Gross <jgross@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Jason Andryuk <jason.andryuk@amd.com>
---
I think the Fixes is correct in that it default enables requiring the
feature.  There were a lot of other changes to how headers were
generated as well.
---
 arch/x86/xen/enlighten.c | 7 +------
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 6 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/x86/xen/enlighten.c b/arch/x86/xen/enlighten.c
index 43dcd8c7badc..6a5cae915eb1 100644
--- a/arch/x86/xen/enlighten.c
+++ b/arch/x86/xen/enlighten.c
@@ -100,10 +100,6 @@ noinstr void *__xen_hypercall_setfunc(void)
 	void (*func)(void);
 
 	/*
-	 * Xen is supported only on CPUs with CPUID, so testing for
-	 * X86_FEATURE_CPUID is a test for early_cpu_init() having been
-	 * run.
-	 *
 	 * Note that __xen_hypercall_setfunc() is noinstr only due to a nasty
 	 * dependency chain: it is being called via the xen_hypercall static
 	 * call when running as a PVH or HVM guest. Hypercalls need to be
@@ -115,8 +111,7 @@ noinstr void *__xen_hypercall_setfunc(void)
 	 */
 	instrumentation_begin();
 
-	if (!boot_cpu_has(X86_FEATURE_CPUID))
-		xen_get_vendor();
+	xen_get_vendor();
 
 	if ((boot_cpu_data.x86_vendor == X86_VENDOR_AMD ||
 	     boot_cpu_data.x86_vendor == X86_VENDOR_HYGON))
-- 
2.34.1


             reply	other threads:[~2025-04-10 19:30 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-04-10 19:31 Jason Andryuk [this message]
2025-04-11  7:46 ` Juergen Gross
2025-04-11  9:27   ` Ingo Molnar
2025-04-11  9:29     ` Jürgen Groß
2025-04-11  9:44       ` Ingo Molnar
2025-04-11 10:01 ` [tip: x86/urgent] x86/xen: Fix __xen_hypercall_setfunc() tip-bot2 for Jason Andryuk

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20250410193106.16353-1-jason.andryuk@amd.com \
    --to=jason.andryuk@amd.com \
    --cc=boris.ostrovsky@oracle.com \
    --cc=bp@alien8.de \
    --cc=dave.hansen@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=hpa@zytor.com \
    --cc=jgross@suse.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@redhat.com \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=x86@kernel.org \
    --cc=xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org \
    --cc=xin@zytor.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®