From: Xuewen Yan <xuewen.yan@unisoc.com>
To: <vincent.guittot@linaro.org>, <dietmar.eggemann@arm.com>,
<mingo@redhat.com>, <peterz@infradead.org>,
<juri.lelli@redhat.com>
Cc: <rostedt@goodmis.org>, <bsegall@google.com>, <mgorman@suse.de>,
<vschneid@redhat.com>, <hongyan.xia2@arm.com>,
<linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, <ke.wang@unisoc.com>,
<di.shen@unisoc.com>, <xuewen.yan94@gmail.com>,
<kprateek.nayak@amd.com>, <kuyo.chang@mediatek.com>,
<juju.sung@mediatek.com>, <qyousef@layalina.io>
Subject: [PATCH V3 1/2] sched/util_est: Simply the condition for util_est_dequeue/enqueue
Date: Thu, 17 Apr 2025 12:34:56 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20250417043457.10632-2-xuewen.yan@unisoc.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250417043457.10632-1-xuewen.yan@unisoc.com>
To prevent double enqueue/dequeue of the util-est for sched_delayed tasks,
commit 729288bc6856 ("kernel/sched: Fix util_est accounting for DELAY_DEQUEUE")
added the corresponding check. This check excludes double en/dequeue during
task migration and priority changes.
In fact, these conditions can be simplified.
For util_est_dequeue, we know that sched_delayed flag is set in dequeue_entity.
When the task is sleeping, we need to call util_est_dequeue to subtract
util-est from the cfs_rq. At this point, sched_delayed has not yet been set.
If we find that sched_delayed is already set, it indicates that this task
has already called dequeue_task_fair once. In this case, there is no need to
call util_est_dequeue again. Therefore, simply checking the sched_delayed flag
should be sufficient to prevent unnecessary util_est updates during the dequeue.
For util_est_enqueue, our goal is to add the util_est to the cfs_rq
when task enqueue. However, we don't want to add the util_est of a
sched_delayed task to the cfs_rq because the task is sleeping.
Therefore, we can exclude the util_est_enqueue for sched_delayed tasks
by checking the sched_delayed flag. However, when waking up a delayed task,
the sched_delayed flag is cleared after util_est_enqueue. As a result,
if we only check the sched_delayed flag, we would miss the util_est_enqueue.
Since waking up a sched_delayed task calls enqueue_task with the ENQUEUE_DELAYED flag,
we can determine whether to call util_est_enqueue by checking if the
enqueue_flag contains ENQUEUE_DELAYED.
Signed-off-by: Xuewen Yan <xuewen.yan@unisoc.com>
---
v3:
- Separated from the previous patch.
- rework the commit message.
---
kernel/sched/fair.c | 4 ++--
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/kernel/sched/fair.c b/kernel/sched/fair.c
index e43993a4e580..18c85857bff0 100644
--- a/kernel/sched/fair.c
+++ b/kernel/sched/fair.c
@@ -6941,7 +6941,7 @@ enqueue_task_fair(struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *p, int flags)
* Let's add the task's estimated utilization to the cfs_rq's
* estimated utilization, before we update schedutil.
*/
- if (!(p->se.sched_delayed && (task_on_rq_migrating(p) || (flags & ENQUEUE_RESTORE))))
+ if (!p->se.sched_delayed || (flags & ENQUEUE_DELAYED))
util_est_enqueue(&rq->cfs, p);
if (flags & ENQUEUE_DELAYED) {
@@ -7183,7 +7183,7 @@ static int dequeue_entities(struct rq *rq, struct sched_entity *se, int flags)
*/
static bool dequeue_task_fair(struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *p, int flags)
{
- if (!(p->se.sched_delayed && (task_on_rq_migrating(p) || (flags & DEQUEUE_SAVE))))
+ if (!p->se.sched_delayed)
util_est_dequeue(&rq->cfs, p);
util_est_update(&rq->cfs, p, flags & DEQUEUE_SLEEP);
--
2.25.1
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-04-17 4:35 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-04-17 4:34 [PATCH V3 0/2] sched: Align uclamp and util_est Xuewen Yan
2025-04-17 4:34 ` Xuewen Yan [this message]
2025-04-18 15:00 ` [PATCH V3 1/2] sched/util_est: Simply the condition for util_est_dequeue/enqueue Vincent Guittot
2025-04-22 15:27 ` Dietmar Eggemann
2025-05-21 12:06 ` [tip: sched/core] sched/util_est: Simplify condition for util_est_{en,de}queue() tip-bot2 for Xuewen Yan
2025-04-17 4:34 ` [PATCH V3 2/2] sched/uclamp: Align uclamp and util_est and call before freq update Xuewen Yan
2025-04-18 15:00 ` Vincent Guittot
2025-05-21 12:06 ` [tip: sched/core] " tip-bot2 for Xuewen Yan
2025-04-22 15:27 ` [PATCH V3 0/2] sched: Align uclamp and util_est Dietmar Eggemann
2025-05-20 5:59 ` Xuewen Yan
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20250417043457.10632-2-xuewen.yan@unisoc.com \
--to=xuewen.yan@unisoc.com \
--cc=bsegall@google.com \
--cc=di.shen@unisoc.com \
--cc=dietmar.eggemann@arm.com \
--cc=hongyan.xia2@arm.com \
--cc=juju.sung@mediatek.com \
--cc=juri.lelli@redhat.com \
--cc=ke.wang@unisoc.com \
--cc=kprateek.nayak@amd.com \
--cc=kuyo.chang@mediatek.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mgorman@suse.de \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=qyousef@layalina.io \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
--cc=vincent.guittot@linaro.org \
--cc=vschneid@redhat.com \
--cc=xuewen.yan94@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®