mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Michal Luczaj <mhal@rbox.co>
To: "Stefano Garzarella" <sgarzare@redhat.com>,
	"David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
	"Eric Dumazet" <edumazet@google.com>,
	"Jakub Kicinski" <kuba@kernel.org>,
	"Paolo Abeni" <pabeni@redhat.com>,
	"Simon Horman" <horms@kernel.org>,
	"Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com>,
	"Jason Wang" <jasowang@redhat.com>,
	"Xuan Zhuo" <xuanzhuo@linux.alibaba.com>,
	"Eugenio Pérez" <eperezma@redhat.com>,
	"Stefan Hajnoczi" <stefanha@redhat.com>
Cc: virtualization@lists.linux.dev, netdev@vger.kernel.org,
	 linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, kvm@vger.kernel.org,
	 Michal Luczaj <mhal@rbox.co>
Subject: [PATCH net-next v2 3/3] vsock/test: Expand linger test to ensure close() does not misbehave
Date: Mon, 21 Apr 2025 23:50:43 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20250421-vsock-linger-v2-3-fe9febd64668@rbox.co> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250421-vsock-linger-v2-0-fe9febd64668@rbox.co>

There was an issue with SO_LINGER: instead of blocking until all queued
messages for the socket have been successfully sent (or the linger timeout
has been reached), close() would block until packets were handled by the
peer.

Add a check to alert on close() lingering when it should not.

Signed-off-by: Michal Luczaj <mhal@rbox.co>
---
 tools/testing/vsock/vsock_test.c | 30 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++---
 1 file changed, 27 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

diff --git a/tools/testing/vsock/vsock_test.c b/tools/testing/vsock/vsock_test.c
index d0f6d253ac72d08a957cb81a3c38fcc72bec5a53..82d0bc20dfa75041f04eada1b4310be2f7c3a0c1 100644
--- a/tools/testing/vsock/vsock_test.c
+++ b/tools/testing/vsock/vsock_test.c
@@ -1788,13 +1788,16 @@ static void test_stream_connect_retry_server(const struct test_opts *opts)
 	close(fd);
 }
 
+#define	LINGER_TIMEOUT	1	/* seconds */
+
 static void test_stream_linger_client(const struct test_opts *opts)
 {
 	struct linger optval = {
 		.l_onoff = 1,
-		.l_linger = 1
+		.l_linger = LINGER_TIMEOUT
 	};
-	int fd;
+	int bytes_unsent, fd;
+	time_t ts;
 
 	fd = vsock_stream_connect(opts->peer_cid, opts->peer_port);
 	if (fd < 0) {
@@ -1807,7 +1810,28 @@ static void test_stream_linger_client(const struct test_opts *opts)
 		exit(EXIT_FAILURE);
 	}
 
+	/* Byte left unread to expose any incorrect behaviour. */
+	send_byte(fd, 1, 0);
+
+	/* Reuse LINGER_TIMEOUT to wait for bytes_unsent == 0. */
+	timeout_begin(LINGER_TIMEOUT);
+	do {
+		if (ioctl(fd, SIOCOUTQ, &bytes_unsent) < 0) {
+			perror("ioctl(SIOCOUTQ)");
+			exit(EXIT_FAILURE);
+		}
+		timeout_check("ioctl(SIOCOUTQ) == 0");
+	} while (bytes_unsent != 0);
+	timeout_end();
+
+	ts = current_nsec();
 	close(fd);
+	if ((current_nsec() - ts) / NSEC_PER_SEC > 0) {
+		fprintf(stderr, "Unexpected lingering on close()\n");
+		exit(EXIT_FAILURE);
+	}
+
+	control_writeln("DONE");
 }
 
 static void test_stream_linger_server(const struct test_opts *opts)
@@ -1820,7 +1844,7 @@ static void test_stream_linger_server(const struct test_opts *opts)
 		exit(EXIT_FAILURE);
 	}
 
-	vsock_wait_remote_close(fd);
+	control_expectln("DONE");
 	close(fd);
 }
 

-- 
2.49.0


      parent reply	other threads:[~2025-04-21 21:51 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-04-21 21:50 [PATCH net-next v2 0/3] vsock: SOCK_LINGER rework Michal Luczaj
2025-04-21 21:50 ` [PATCH net-next v2 1/3] vsock: Linger on unsent data Michal Luczaj
2025-04-23 15:53   ` Luigi Leonardi
2025-04-23 16:34     ` Stefano Garzarella
2025-04-23 21:06       ` Michal Luczaj
2025-04-24  7:28         ` Stefano Garzarella
2025-04-24  7:52           ` Michal Luczaj
2025-04-24  8:36             ` Stefano Garzarella
2025-04-24 11:24               ` Michal Luczaj
2025-04-28 13:56                 ` Stefano Garzarella
2025-04-30  9:13                   ` Michal Luczaj
2025-04-21 21:50 ` [PATCH net-next v2 2/3] vsock: Reduce indentation in virtio_transport_wait_close() Michal Luczaj
2025-04-21 21:50 ` Michal Luczaj [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20250421-vsock-linger-v2-3-fe9febd64668@rbox.co \
    --to=mhal@rbox.co \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=edumazet@google.com \
    --cc=eperezma@redhat.com \
    --cc=horms@kernel.org \
    --cc=jasowang@redhat.com \
    --cc=kuba@kernel.org \
    --cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mst@redhat.com \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
    --cc=sgarzare@redhat.com \
    --cc=stefanha@redhat.com \
    --cc=virtualization@lists.linux.dev \
    --cc=xuanzhuo@linux.alibaba.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®