From: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
To: Ard Biesheuvel <ardb+git@google.com>,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Cc: oe-kbuild-all@lists.linux.dev, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
will@kernel.org, catalin.marinas@arm.com, mark.rutland@arm.com,
Ard Biesheuvel <ardb@kernel.org>,
Yeoreum Yun <yeoreum.yun@arm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] arm64/boot: Move init_pgdir[] into __pi_ namespace
Date: Tue, 6 May 2025 07:50:59 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <202505060740.OIkWGFVZ-lkp@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250503112137.1962910-6-ardb+git@google.com>
Hi Ard,
kernel test robot noticed the following build errors:
[auto build test ERROR on soc/for-next]
[also build test ERROR on arm/for-next arm/fixes linus/master v6.15-rc5 next-20250505]
[cannot apply to arm64/for-next/core kvmarm/next]
[If your patch is applied to the wrong git tree, kindly drop us a note.
And when submitting patch, we suggest to use '--base' as documented in
https://git-scm.com/docs/git-format-patch#_base_tree_information]
url: https://github.com/intel-lab-lkp/linux/commits/Ard-Biesheuvel/arm64-boot-Move-init_pgdir-into-__pi_-namespace/20250503-192534
base: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/soc/soc.git for-next
patch link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20250503112137.1962910-6-ardb%2Bgit%40google.com
patch subject: [PATCH 1/3] arm64/boot: Move init_pgdir[] into __pi_ namespace
config: arm64-allnoconfig (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20250506/202505060740.OIkWGFVZ-lkp@intel.com/config)
compiler: aarch64-linux-gcc (GCC) 14.2.0
reproduce (this is a W=1 build): (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20250506/202505060740.OIkWGFVZ-lkp@intel.com/reproduce)
If you fix the issue in a separate patch/commit (i.e. not just a new version of
the same patch/commit), kindly add following tags
| Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
| Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-kbuild-all/202505060740.OIkWGFVZ-lkp@intel.com/
All errors (new ones prefixed by >>):
arch/arm64/kernel/pi/map_kernel.c: In function 'remap_idmap_for_lpa2':
>> arch/arm64/kernel/pi/map_kernel.c:191:37: error: 'init_pg_end' undeclared (first use in this function); did you mean 'init_pg_dir'?
191 | memset(init_pg_dir, 0, (u64)init_pg_end - (u64)init_pg_dir);
| ^~~~~~~~~~~
| init_pg_dir
arch/arm64/kernel/pi/map_kernel.c:191:37: note: each undeclared identifier is reported only once for each function it appears in
arch/arm64/kernel/pi/map_kernel.c: In function 'early_map_kernel':
arch/arm64/kernel/pi/map_kernel.c:222:37: error: 'init_pg_end' undeclared (first use in this function); did you mean 'init_pg_dir'?
222 | memset(__bss_start, 0, (u64)init_pg_end - (u64)__bss_start);
| ^~~~~~~~~~~
| init_pg_dir
vim +191 arch/arm64/kernel/pi/map_kernel.c
9684ec186f8fad Ard Biesheuvel 2024-02-14 158
9684ec186f8fad Ard Biesheuvel 2024-02-14 159 static void __init remap_idmap_for_lpa2(void)
9684ec186f8fad Ard Biesheuvel 2024-02-14 160 {
9684ec186f8fad Ard Biesheuvel 2024-02-14 161 /* clear the bits that change meaning once LPA2 is turned on */
9684ec186f8fad Ard Biesheuvel 2024-02-14 162 pteval_t mask = PTE_SHARED;
9684ec186f8fad Ard Biesheuvel 2024-02-14 163
9684ec186f8fad Ard Biesheuvel 2024-02-14 164 /*
9684ec186f8fad Ard Biesheuvel 2024-02-14 165 * We have to clear bits [9:8] in all block or page descriptors in the
9684ec186f8fad Ard Biesheuvel 2024-02-14 166 * initial ID map, as otherwise they will be (mis)interpreted as
9684ec186f8fad Ard Biesheuvel 2024-02-14 167 * physical address bits once we flick the LPA2 switch (TCR.DS). Since
9684ec186f8fad Ard Biesheuvel 2024-02-14 168 * we cannot manipulate live descriptors in that way without creating
9684ec186f8fad Ard Biesheuvel 2024-02-14 169 * potential TLB conflicts, let's create another temporary ID map in a
9684ec186f8fad Ard Biesheuvel 2024-02-14 170 * LPA2 compatible fashion, and update the initial ID map while running
9684ec186f8fad Ard Biesheuvel 2024-02-14 171 * from that.
9684ec186f8fad Ard Biesheuvel 2024-02-14 172 */
9684ec186f8fad Ard Biesheuvel 2024-02-14 173 create_init_idmap(init_pg_dir, mask);
9684ec186f8fad Ard Biesheuvel 2024-02-14 174 dsb(ishst);
9684ec186f8fad Ard Biesheuvel 2024-02-14 175 set_ttbr0_for_lpa2((u64)init_pg_dir);
9684ec186f8fad Ard Biesheuvel 2024-02-14 176
9684ec186f8fad Ard Biesheuvel 2024-02-14 177 /*
9684ec186f8fad Ard Biesheuvel 2024-02-14 178 * Recreate the initial ID map with the same granularity as before.
9684ec186f8fad Ard Biesheuvel 2024-02-14 179 * Don't bother with the FDT, we no longer need it after this.
9684ec186f8fad Ard Biesheuvel 2024-02-14 180 */
9684ec186f8fad Ard Biesheuvel 2024-02-14 181 memset(init_idmap_pg_dir, 0,
ecc54006f158ae Zenghui Yu 2024-06-21 182 (u64)init_idmap_pg_end - (u64)init_idmap_pg_dir);
9684ec186f8fad Ard Biesheuvel 2024-02-14 183
9684ec186f8fad Ard Biesheuvel 2024-02-14 184 create_init_idmap(init_idmap_pg_dir, mask);
9684ec186f8fad Ard Biesheuvel 2024-02-14 185 dsb(ishst);
9684ec186f8fad Ard Biesheuvel 2024-02-14 186
9684ec186f8fad Ard Biesheuvel 2024-02-14 187 /* switch back to the updated initial ID map */
9684ec186f8fad Ard Biesheuvel 2024-02-14 188 set_ttbr0_for_lpa2((u64)init_idmap_pg_dir);
9684ec186f8fad Ard Biesheuvel 2024-02-14 189
9684ec186f8fad Ard Biesheuvel 2024-02-14 190 /* wipe the temporary ID map from memory */
9684ec186f8fad Ard Biesheuvel 2024-02-14 @191 memset(init_pg_dir, 0, (u64)init_pg_end - (u64)init_pg_dir);
9684ec186f8fad Ard Biesheuvel 2024-02-14 192 }
9684ec186f8fad Ard Biesheuvel 2024-02-14 193
--
0-DAY CI Kernel Test Service
https://github.com/intel/lkp-tests/wiki
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-05-05 23:51 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-05-03 11:21 [PATCH 0/3] arm64/boot: Forbid the use of BSS symbols in startup code Ard Biesheuvel
2025-05-03 11:21 ` [PATCH 1/3] arm64/boot: Move init_pgdir[] into __pi_ namespace Ard Biesheuvel
2025-05-03 11:28 ` Ard Biesheuvel
2025-05-05 13:54 ` kernel test robot
2025-05-05 23:50 ` kernel test robot [this message]
2025-05-03 11:21 ` [PATCH 3/3] arm64/boot: Disallow BSS exports to startup code Ard Biesheuvel
2025-05-03 11:45 ` Ard Biesheuvel
2025-05-03 11:21 ` [PATCH 2/3] arm64/boot: Move global CPU override variables out of BSS Ard Biesheuvel
2025-05-08 11:14 ` [PATCH 0/3] arm64/boot: Forbid the use of BSS symbols in startup code Yeoreum Yun
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=202505060740.OIkWGFVZ-lkp@intel.com \
--to=lkp@intel.com \
--cc=ardb+git@google.com \
--cc=ardb@kernel.org \
--cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
--cc=oe-kbuild-all@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=will@kernel.org \
--cc=yeoreum.yun@arm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®