mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "yohan.joung" <yohan.joung@sk.com>
To: linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
Cc: chao@kernel.org, daehojeong@google.com, jaegeuk@kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, pilhyun.kim@sk.com,
	yohan.joung@sk.com
Subject: Re: [f2fs-dev] [PATCH v3 2/2] f2fs: add ckpt_valid_blocks to the section entry
Date: Wed,  7 May 2025 18:03:12 +0900	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20250507090312.614-1-yohan.joung@sk.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <c6714296-6dee-429e-8aa7-897fbf657231@kernel.org>

>On 5/7/25 12:30, yohan.joung wrote:
>> when performing buffered writes in a large section,
>> overhead is incurred due to the iteration through
>> ckpt_valid_blocks within the section.
>> when SEGS_PER_SEC is 128, this overhead accounts for 20% within
>> the f2fs_write_single_data_page routine.
>> as the size of the section increases, the overhead also grows.
>> to handle this problem ckpt_valid_blocks is
>> added within the section entries.
>> 
>> Test
>> insmod null_blk.ko nr_devices=1 completion_nsec=1  submit_queues=8
>> hw_queue_depth=64 max_sectors=512 bs=4096 memory_backed=1
>> make_f2fs /dev/block/nullb0
>> make_f2fs -s 128 /dev/block/nullb0
>> fio --bs=512k --size=1536M --rw=write --name=1
>> --filename=/mnt/test_dir/seq_write
>> --ioengine=io_uring --iodepth=64 --end_fsync=1
>> 
>> before
>> SEGS_PER_SEC 1
>> 2556MiB/s
>> SEGS_PER_SEC 128
>> 2145MiB/s
>> 
>> after
>> SEGS_PER_SEC 1
>> 2556MiB/s
>> SEGS_PER_SEC 128
>> 2556MiB/s
>> 
>> Signed-off-by: yohan.joung <yohan.joung@sk.com>
>> ---
>>  fs/f2fs/segment.c | 29 ++++++++++++++++++++++-------
>>  fs/f2fs/segment.h | 29 ++++++++++++++++++-----------
>>  2 files changed, 40 insertions(+), 18 deletions(-)
>> 
>> diff --git a/fs/f2fs/segment.c b/fs/f2fs/segment.c
>> index 671bc5a8fd4a..09b66a755559 100644
>> --- a/fs/f2fs/segment.c
>> +++ b/fs/f2fs/segment.c
>> @@ -2447,7 +2447,7 @@ static void update_segment_mtime(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi, block_t blkaddr,
>>   * that the consecutive input blocks belong to the same segment.
>>   */
>>  static int update_sit_entry_for_release(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi, struct seg_entry *se,
>> -				block_t blkaddr, unsigned int offset, int del)
>> +				unsigned int segno, block_t blkaddr, unsigned int offset, int del)
>>  {
>>  	bool exist;
>>  #ifdef CONFIG_F2FS_CHECK_FS
>> @@ -2492,15 +2492,18 @@ static int update_sit_entry_for_release(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi, struct seg_ent
>>  				f2fs_test_and_clear_bit(offset + i, se->discard_map))
>>  			sbi->discard_blks++;
>>  
>> -		if (!f2fs_test_bit(offset + i, se->ckpt_valid_map))
>> +		if (!f2fs_test_bit(offset + i, se->ckpt_valid_map)) {
>>  			se->ckpt_valid_blocks -= 1;
>> +			if (__is_large_section(sbi))
>> +				get_sec_entry(sbi, segno)->ckpt_valid_blocks -= 1;
>> +		}
>>  	}
>>  
>>  	return del;
>>  }
>>  
>>  static int update_sit_entry_for_alloc(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi, struct seg_entry *se,
>> -				block_t blkaddr, unsigned int offset, int del)
>> +				unsigned int segno, block_t blkaddr, unsigned int offset, int del)
>>  {
>>  	bool exist;
>>  #ifdef CONFIG_F2FS_CHECK_FS
>> @@ -2533,12 +2536,18 @@ static int update_sit_entry_for_alloc(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi, struct seg_entry
>>  	 * or newly invalidated.
>>  	 */
>>  	if (!is_sbi_flag_set(sbi, SBI_CP_DISABLED)) {
>> -		if (!f2fs_test_and_set_bit(offset, se->ckpt_valid_map))
>> +		if (!f2fs_test_and_set_bit(offset, se->ckpt_valid_map)) {
>>  			se->ckpt_valid_blocks++;
>> +			if (__is_large_section(sbi))
>> +				get_sec_entry(sbi, segno)->ckpt_valid_blocks++;
>
>What about adding sanity_check_valid_blocks() to check consistency between
>valid blocks of segments and valid blocks of section? Covered w/
>CONFIG_F2FS_CHECK_FS.
I will add it, thanks
>
>> +		}
>>  	}
>>  
>> -	if (!f2fs_test_bit(offset, se->ckpt_valid_map))
>> +	if (!f2fs_test_bit(offset, se->ckpt_valid_map)) {
>>  		se->ckpt_valid_blocks += del;
>> +		if (__is_large_section(sbi))
>> +			get_sec_entry(sbi, segno)->ckpt_valid_blocks += del;
>> +	}
>>  
>>  	return del;
>>  }
>> @@ -2569,9 +2578,9 @@ static void update_sit_entry(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi, block_t blkaddr, int del)
>>  
>>  	/* Update valid block bitmap */
>>  	if (del > 0) {
>> -		del = update_sit_entry_for_alloc(sbi, se, blkaddr, offset, del);
>> +		del = update_sit_entry_for_alloc(sbi, se, segno, blkaddr, offset, del);
>>  	} else {
>> -		del = update_sit_entry_for_release(sbi, se, blkaddr, offset, del);
>> +		del = update_sit_entry_for_release(sbi, se, segno, blkaddr, offset, del);
>>  	}
>>  
>>  	__mark_sit_entry_dirty(sbi, segno);
>> @@ -5029,6 +5038,12 @@ static int build_sit_entries(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi)
>>  	}
>>  	up_read(&curseg->journal_rwsem);
>>  
>> +	/* update ckpt_ckpt_valid_block */
>> +	if (__is_large_section(sbi)) {
>> +		for (unsigned int segno = 0; segno < MAIN_SEGS(sbi); segno += SEGS_PER_SEC(sbi))
>
>		unsigned int segno;
>
>		for (segno = 0; segno < MAIN_SEGS(sbi);
>					segno += SEGS_PER_SEC(sbi))
>
>> +			set_ckpt_valid_blocks(sbi, segno);
>
>ckpt_valid_blocks will be reset in f2fs_flush_sit_entries -> seg_info_to_raw_sit,
>we need to call set_ckpt_valid_blocks() for each updated section?
>
>Thanks,
going to add set_ckpt_valid_blocks to seg_info_to_raw_sit
Thanks.
>
>> +	}
>> +
>>  	if (err)
>>  		return err;
>>  
>> diff --git a/fs/f2fs/segment.h b/fs/f2fs/segment.h
>> index f5d30f32ebdb..e91d944f003a 100644
>> --- a/fs/f2fs/segment.h
>> +++ b/fs/f2fs/segment.h
>> @@ -211,6 +211,7 @@ struct seg_entry {
>>  
>>  struct sec_entry {
>>  	unsigned int valid_blocks;	/* # of valid blocks in a section */
>> +	unsigned int ckpt_valid_blocks; /* # of valid blocks last cp in a section */
>>  };
>>  
>>  #define MAX_SKIP_GC_COUNT			16
>> @@ -347,20 +348,26 @@ static inline unsigned int get_valid_blocks(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi,
>>  static inline unsigned int get_ckpt_valid_blocks(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi,
>>  				unsigned int segno, bool use_section)
>>  {
>> -	if (use_section && __is_large_section(sbi)) {
>> -		unsigned int secno = GET_SEC_FROM_SEG(sbi, segno);
>> -		unsigned int start_segno = GET_SEG_FROM_SEC(sbi, secno);
>> -		unsigned int blocks = 0;
>> -		int i;
>> +	if (use_section && __is_large_section(sbi))
>> +		return get_sec_entry(sbi, segno)->ckpt_valid_blocks;
>> +	else
>> +		return get_seg_entry(sbi, segno)->ckpt_valid_blocks;
>> +}
>> +
>> +static inline void set_ckpt_valid_blocks(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi,
>> +		unsigned int segno)
>> +{
>> +	unsigned int secno = GET_SEC_FROM_SEG(sbi, segno);
>> +	unsigned int start_segno = GET_SEG_FROM_SEC(sbi, secno);
>> +	unsigned int blocks = 0;
>> +	int i;
>>  
>> -		for (i = 0; i < SEGS_PER_SEC(sbi); i++, start_segno++) {
>> -			struct seg_entry *se = get_seg_entry(sbi, start_segno);
>> +	for (i = 0; i < SEGS_PER_SEC(sbi); i++, start_segno++) {
>> +		struct seg_entry *se = get_seg_entry(sbi, start_segno);
>>  
>> -			blocks += se->ckpt_valid_blocks;
>> -		}
>> -		return blocks;
>> +		blocks += se->ckpt_valid_blocks;
>>  	}
>> -	return get_seg_entry(sbi, segno)->ckpt_valid_blocks;
>> +	get_sec_entry(sbi, segno)->ckpt_valid_blocks = blocks;
>>  }
>>  
>>  static inline void seg_info_from_raw_sit(struct seg_entry *se,

  reply	other threads:[~2025-05-07  9:03 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-05-07  4:30 [PATCH v3 1/2] f2fs: add a method for calculating the remaining blocks in the current segment in LFS mode yohan.joung
2025-05-07  4:30 ` [PATCH v3 2/2] f2fs: add ckpt_valid_blocks to the section entry yohan.joung
2025-05-07  8:47   ` Chao Yu
2025-05-07  9:03     ` yohan.joung [this message]
2025-05-07  8:25 ` [PATCH v3 1/2] f2fs: add a method for calculating the remaining blocks in the current segment in LFS mode Chao Yu

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20250507090312.614-1-yohan.joung@sk.com \
    --to=yohan.joung@sk.com \
    --cc=chao@kernel.org \
    --cc=daehojeong@google.com \
    --cc=jaegeuk@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=pilhyun.kim@sk.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®