From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mgamail.intel.com (mgamail.intel.com [192.198.163.16]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 801271E7C34; Wed, 7 May 2025 05:44:49 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=192.198.163.16 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1746596692; cv=none; b=iCftFI3+hdb+ZWKw2fR4ALxoMACw6AT8wIrG7j68YDzolxSvGgGAMccvoy258E1nWgrWifpBO49UWABXFIBrLKc/WJfArSlOGHlmj4UN8FOaGfS7BY6Nb2cMsfM6BCIJceMKAug1Hb/7FFxC9PnNuSYW+MsMFs/NjpY33r2mICo= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1746596692; c=relaxed/simple; bh=dET57/3w7AB13kQwYH18hcOd/6ONv+xqKFslnB4Aw1E=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=gdfMC87jIEbXjLAGTAvPBExX07WDbUvt1SyHmBrVyjK0++2MRkcuv/tEHlXn2g/zHvU+hH/WU+NyFmDxqf5LE2knKXtZa/fWLkfSHspPbxV+B53yqkt0HahbRZsc7pafdSLldyDg9aJGV1orDnmqI77n1Sdleyo5mmKd0K6jtsE= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=intel.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=intel.com; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=intel.com header.i=@intel.com header.b=AMCrJBwn; arc=none smtp.client-ip=192.198.163.16 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=intel.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=intel.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=intel.com header.i=@intel.com header.b="AMCrJBwn" DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=intel.com; i=@intel.com; q=dns/txt; s=Intel; t=1746596689; x=1778132689; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references: mime-version:in-reply-to; bh=dET57/3w7AB13kQwYH18hcOd/6ONv+xqKFslnB4Aw1E=; b=AMCrJBwnMSAEhfknUhieo041xJqbDWHJhQlCWGK4dfu3cj8rBvYtDqmH yWtBXGhxcczZZSF8koCvFnT7O66lntACHcj8MMWi1ZwL5vU0WWKSxYMmV sbdh4dptULT1BsG0I13ifQY0XKMidfMogpjZgP/1t65CNYjt4QBnLWBDU qQk4XZJd0b3FFsm77kuM+fIC3JMOX/eDTG7CW5mhJD24zV5jn7rat6iHu 1vVVsGX39iXXwBmShAdf3kYiIrO3J+MoffNW7sS3gEUfwN0ugaSBC91oo BmzkcebN2bmbmIzKvGLvI1xvQQ59ILwaG3TbJTOhpXo0G0+k81AaQY4JM w==; X-CSE-ConnectionGUID: CdNASeqrTZaH2BfvljYAdg== X-CSE-MsgGUID: vyxluEeTS7ChrUJ3Tdtb6A== X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="6700,10204,11425"; a="35932877" X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.15,268,1739865600"; d="scan'208";a="35932877" Received: from orviesa005.jf.intel.com ([10.64.159.145]) by fmvoesa110.fm.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 06 May 2025 22:44:49 -0700 X-CSE-ConnectionGUID: c4D2Ws4lRaymkTlaqFHm/g== X-CSE-MsgGUID: ocnwfwJRR2WLdCgnFPKUdg== X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.15,268,1739865600"; d="scan'208";a="140959206" Received: from lkp-server01.sh.intel.com (HELO 1992f890471c) ([10.239.97.150]) by orviesa005.jf.intel.com with ESMTP; 06 May 2025 22:44:46 -0700 Received: from kbuild by 1992f890471c with local (Exim 4.96) (envelope-from ) id 1uCXaF-000769-1E; Wed, 07 May 2025 05:44:43 +0000 Date: Wed, 7 May 2025 13:44:34 +0800 From: kernel test robot To: Dan Williams , dave.hansen@linux.intel.com Cc: oe-kbuild-all@lists.linux.dev, x86@kernel.org, Kees Cook , Ingo Molnar , Naveen N Rao , Vishal Annapurve , Kirill Shutemov , Nikolay Borisov , stable@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-coco@lists.linux.dev Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 2/2] x86/devmem: Drop /dev/mem access for confidential guests Message-ID: <202505071309.Aa4vRJxa-lkp@intel.com> References: <174491712829.1395340.5054725417641299524.stgit@dwillia2-xfh.jf.intel.com> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <174491712829.1395340.5054725417641299524.stgit@dwillia2-xfh.jf.intel.com> Hi Dan, kernel test robot noticed the following build errors: [auto build test ERROR on 0af2f6be1b4281385b618cb86ad946eded089ac8] url: https://github.com/intel-lab-lkp/linux/commits/Dan-Williams/x86-devmem-Remove-duplicate-range_is_allowed-definition/20250419-080713 base: 0af2f6be1b4281385b618cb86ad946eded089ac8 patch link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/174491712829.1395340.5054725417641299524.stgit%40dwillia2-xfh.jf.intel.com patch subject: [PATCH v3 2/2] x86/devmem: Drop /dev/mem access for confidential guests config: openrisc-randconfig-r073-20250428 (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20250507/202505071309.Aa4vRJxa-lkp@intel.com/config) compiler: or1k-linux-gcc (GCC) 10.5.0 reproduce (this is a W=1 build): (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20250507/202505071309.Aa4vRJxa-lkp@intel.com/reproduce) If you fix the issue in a separate patch/commit (i.e. not just a new version of the same patch/commit), kindly add following tags | Reported-by: kernel test robot | Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-kbuild-all/202505071309.Aa4vRJxa-lkp@intel.com/ All errors (new ones prefixed by >>): drivers/char/mem.c: In function 'open_port': >> drivers/char/mem.c:604:6: error: implicit declaration of function 'cc_platform_has' [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration] 604 | cc_platform_has(CC_ATTR_GUEST_MEM_ENCRYPT)) | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ >> drivers/char/mem.c:604:22: error: 'CC_ATTR_GUEST_MEM_ENCRYPT' undeclared (first use in this function) 604 | cc_platform_has(CC_ATTR_GUEST_MEM_ENCRYPT)) | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ drivers/char/mem.c:604:22: note: each undeclared identifier is reported only once for each function it appears in cc1: some warnings being treated as errors vim +/cc_platform_has +604 drivers/char/mem.c 586 587 static int open_port(struct inode *inode, struct file *filp) 588 { 589 int rc; 590 591 if (!capable(CAP_SYS_RAWIO)) 592 return -EPERM; 593 594 rc = security_locked_down(LOCKDOWN_DEV_MEM); 595 if (rc) 596 return rc; 597 598 /* 599 * Enforce encrypted mapping consistency and avoid unaccepted 600 * memory conflicts, "lockdown" /dev/mem for confidential 601 * guests. 602 */ 603 if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_STRICT_DEVMEM) && > 604 cc_platform_has(CC_ATTR_GUEST_MEM_ENCRYPT)) 605 return -EPERM; 606 607 if (iminor(inode) != DEVMEM_MINOR) 608 return 0; 609 610 /* 611 * Use a unified address space to have a single point to manage 612 * revocations when drivers want to take over a /dev/mem mapped 613 * range. 614 */ 615 filp->f_mapping = iomem_get_mapping(); 616 617 return 0; 618 } 619 -- 0-DAY CI Kernel Test Service https://github.com/intel/lkp-tests/wiki