From: Gabriele Monaco <gmonaco@redhat.com>
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@kernel.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
Waiman Long <longman@redhat.com>
Cc: Gabriele Monaco <gmonaco@redhat.com>
Subject: [PATCH v5 3/6] cgroup/cpuset: Rename update_unbound_workqueue_cpumask() to update_exclusion_cpumasks()
Date: Thu, 8 May 2025 16:53:23 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20250508145319.97794-11-gmonaco@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250508145319.97794-8-gmonaco@redhat.com>
update_unbound_workqueue_cpumask() updates unbound workqueues settings
when there's a change in isolated CPUs, but it can be used for other
subsystems requiring updated when isolated CPUs change.
Generalise the name to update_exclusion_cpumasks() to prepare for other
functions unrelated to workqueues to be called in that spot.
Signed-off-by: Gabriele Monaco <gmonaco@redhat.com>
---
kernel/cgroup/cpuset.c | 12 ++++++------
1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
diff --git a/kernel/cgroup/cpuset.c b/kernel/cgroup/cpuset.c
index 306b60430091..95316d39c282 100644
--- a/kernel/cgroup/cpuset.c
+++ b/kernel/cgroup/cpuset.c
@@ -1323,7 +1323,7 @@ static bool partition_xcpus_del(int old_prs, struct cpuset *parent,
return isolcpus_updated;
}
-static void update_unbound_workqueue_cpumask(bool isolcpus_updated)
+static void update_exclusion_cpumasks(bool isolcpus_updated)
{
int ret;
@@ -1454,7 +1454,7 @@ static int remote_partition_enable(struct cpuset *cs, int new_prs,
list_add(&cs->remote_sibling, &remote_children);
cpumask_copy(cs->effective_xcpus, tmp->new_cpus);
spin_unlock_irq(&callback_lock);
- update_unbound_workqueue_cpumask(isolcpus_updated);
+ update_exclusion_cpumasks(isolcpus_updated);
cpuset_force_rebuild();
cs->prs_err = 0;
@@ -1495,7 +1495,7 @@ static void remote_partition_disable(struct cpuset *cs, struct tmpmasks *tmp)
compute_effective_exclusive_cpumask(cs, NULL, NULL);
reset_partition_data(cs);
spin_unlock_irq(&callback_lock);
- update_unbound_workqueue_cpumask(isolcpus_updated);
+ update_exclusion_cpumasks(isolcpus_updated);
cpuset_force_rebuild();
/*
@@ -1563,7 +1563,7 @@ static void remote_cpus_update(struct cpuset *cs, struct cpumask *xcpus,
if (xcpus)
cpumask_copy(cs->exclusive_cpus, xcpus);
spin_unlock_irq(&callback_lock);
- update_unbound_workqueue_cpumask(isolcpus_updated);
+ update_exclusion_cpumasks(isolcpus_updated);
if (adding || deleting)
cpuset_force_rebuild();
@@ -1906,7 +1906,7 @@ static int update_parent_effective_cpumask(struct cpuset *cs, int cmd,
WARN_ON_ONCE(parent->nr_subparts < 0);
}
spin_unlock_irq(&callback_lock);
- update_unbound_workqueue_cpumask(isolcpus_updated);
+ update_exclusion_cpumasks(isolcpus_updated);
if ((old_prs != new_prs) && (cmd == partcmd_update))
update_partition_exclusive_flag(cs, new_prs);
@@ -2931,7 +2931,7 @@ static int update_prstate(struct cpuset *cs, int new_prs)
else if (isolcpus_updated)
isolated_cpus_update(old_prs, new_prs, cs->effective_xcpus);
spin_unlock_irq(&callback_lock);
- update_unbound_workqueue_cpumask(isolcpus_updated);
+ update_exclusion_cpumasks(isolcpus_updated);
/* Force update if switching back to member & update effective_xcpus */
update_cpumasks_hier(cs, &tmpmask, !new_prs);
--
2.49.0
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-05-08 14:54 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-05-08 14:53 [PATCH v5 0/6] timers: Exclude isolated cpus from timer migation Gabriele Monaco
2025-05-08 14:53 ` [PATCH v5 1/6] timers: Rename tmigr 'online' bit to 'available' Gabriele Monaco
2025-05-08 14:53 ` [PATCH v5 2/6] timers: Add the available mask in timer migration Gabriele Monaco
2025-05-08 14:53 ` Gabriele Monaco [this message]
2025-05-08 14:53 ` [PATCH v5 4/6] sched/isolation: Force housekeeping if isolcpus and nohz_full don't leave any Gabriele Monaco
2025-05-20 10:17 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2025-05-20 11:17 ` Gabriele Monaco
2025-05-20 11:57 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2025-05-20 12:02 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2025-05-20 12:28 ` Gabriele Monaco
2025-05-08 14:53 ` [PATCH v5 5/6] cgroup/cpuset: Fail if isolated and nohz_full don't leave any housekeeping Gabriele Monaco
2025-05-20 13:39 ` Gabriele Monaco
2025-05-20 14:28 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2025-05-20 15:24 ` Gabriele Monaco
2025-05-23 11:15 ` Gabriele Monaco
2025-06-24 14:11 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2025-05-08 14:53 ` [PATCH v5 6/6] timers: Exclude isolated cpus from timer migation Gabriele Monaco
2025-05-20 14:43 ` Frederic Weisbecker
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20250508145319.97794-11-gmonaco@redhat.com \
--to=gmonaco@redhat.com \
--cc=frederic@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=longman@redhat.com \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®