From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from perceval.ideasonboard.com (perceval.ideasonboard.com [213.167.242.64]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B5B461E5B71 for ; Wed, 14 May 2025 22:44:20 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=213.167.242.64 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1747262663; cv=none; b=BFK88BUeyJnsZBrwBkIQRxYRmvsWRm+w2x4mlC6OLuuSJmd7beW9SDQ4fnijRnDFCBfxqrFoKauOzpZouKGAccaOONWOXnUhASbnRbKfk0tCIwgDEKbIKJivl35SaWgibHDSB73jxrGLFdqgq3Gk1dUX291Qrz9t2huNrLv5HrY= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1747262663; c=relaxed/simple; bh=a9g5/nTsv58/kN/3kVuw5tJnxuUMmHXHoyRiQwDN6KA=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=CK028Z96CUJW5uRXod10kv6BuU+eCmU8AUOqn93IMKh+t3rVLbS71KugQ/LJ2vbnfhmmjwt58d4y66qs5wHeZ8klQt17SBaSL4HosEY+9HhmlwaGilhg2OpnxUO+Lrcwuj2FEOrCCWP1O+gFKu9OdEebp6gsDAK/G30/haSwfjo= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=ideasonboard.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=ideasonboard.com; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=ideasonboard.com header.i=@ideasonboard.com header.b=NOPCxL0z; arc=none smtp.client-ip=213.167.242.64 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=ideasonboard.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=ideasonboard.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=ideasonboard.com header.i=@ideasonboard.com header.b="NOPCxL0z" Received: from pendragon.ideasonboard.com (cust-east-par-46-193-72-226.cust.wifirst.net [46.193.72.226]) by perceval.ideasonboard.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 6030082A; Thu, 15 May 2025 00:44:01 +0200 (CEST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=ideasonboard.com; s=mail; t=1747262641; bh=a9g5/nTsv58/kN/3kVuw5tJnxuUMmHXHoyRiQwDN6KA=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=NOPCxL0zZeEpZY+zGdWCZqYl2+Wtn65QqMDz3lWi06Alj2mZ+ip3dTKMu33YxtXhU /Ho+PLZx9vDJB8ay/R75U0/ZlAh8Ei7gXTjXJiCUFVawTJk+TCw3wnkSxuCJZm+JO3 FFLvZjbSNtHwEHqW0y5WMSwINo7NFtTWK6vuaQmM= Date: Thu, 15 May 2025 00:44:10 +0200 From: Laurent Pinchart To: Marco Felsch Cc: andrzej.hajda@intel.com, neil.armstrong@linaro.org, rfoss@kernel.org, jonas@kwiboo.se, jernej.skrabec@gmail.com, maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com, mripard@kernel.org, tzimmermann@suse.de, airlied@gmail.com, simona@ffwll.ch, dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, kernel@pengutronix.de Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/3] drm/bridge: fsl-ldb: simplify device_node error handling Message-ID: <20250514224410.GL23592@pendragon.ideasonboard.com> References: <20250514222453.440915-1-m.felsch@pengutronix.de> <20250514222453.440915-4-m.felsch@pengutronix.de> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20250514222453.440915-4-m.felsch@pengutronix.de> Hi Marco, On Thu, May 15, 2025 at 12:24:53AM +0200, Marco Felsch wrote: > Make use of __free(device_node) to simplify the of_node_put() error > handling paths. No functional changes. > > Signed-off-by: Marco Felsch > --- > drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/fsl-ldb.c | 24 +++++++++--------------- > 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 15 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/fsl-ldb.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/fsl-ldb.c > index e0a229c91953..cea9ddaa5e01 100644 > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/fsl-ldb.c > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/fsl-ldb.c > @@ -287,8 +287,9 @@ static const struct drm_bridge_funcs funcs = { > static int fsl_ldb_probe(struct platform_device *pdev) > { > struct device *dev = &pdev->dev; > - struct device_node *panel_node; > - struct device_node *remote1, *remote2; > + struct device_node *panel_node __free(device_node) = NULL; > + struct device_node *remote1 __free(device_node) = NULL; > + struct device_node *remote2 __free(device_node) = NULL; > struct drm_panel *panel; > struct fsl_ldb *fsl_ldb; > int dual_link; > @@ -321,21 +322,16 @@ static int fsl_ldb_probe(struct platform_device *pdev) > remote2 = of_graph_get_remote_node(dev->of_node, 2, 0); > fsl_ldb->ch0_enabled = (remote1 != NULL); > fsl_ldb->ch1_enabled = (remote2 != NULL); > - panel_node = of_node_get(remote1 ? remote1 : remote2); > - of_node_put(remote1); > - of_node_put(remote2); > + panel_node = remote1 ? remote1 : remote2; This will cause a double put of panel_node, once due to __free() on remote1 or remote2, and the second time due to __free() on panel_node. > > - if (!fsl_ldb->ch0_enabled && !fsl_ldb->ch1_enabled) { > - of_node_put(panel_node); > + if (!fsl_ldb->ch0_enabled && !fsl_ldb->ch1_enabled) > return dev_err_probe(dev, -ENXIO, "No panel node found"); > - } > > dev_dbg(dev, "Using %s\n", > fsl_ldb_is_dual(fsl_ldb) ? "dual-link mode" : > fsl_ldb->ch0_enabled ? "channel 0" : "channel 1"); > > panel = of_drm_find_panel(panel_node); > - of_node_put(panel_node); > if (IS_ERR(panel)) > return dev_err_probe(dev, PTR_ERR(panel), "drm panel not found\n"); > > @@ -345,14 +341,12 @@ static int fsl_ldb_probe(struct platform_device *pdev) > "drm panel-bridge add failed\n"); > > if (fsl_ldb_is_dual(fsl_ldb)) { > - struct device_node *port1, *port2; > + struct device_node *port1 __free(device_node) = > + of_graph_get_port_by_id(dev->of_node, 1); > + struct device_node *port2 __free(device_node) = > + of_graph_get_port_by_id(dev->of_node, 2); > > - port1 = of_graph_get_port_by_id(dev->of_node, 1); > - port2 = of_graph_get_port_by_id(dev->of_node, 2); > dual_link = drm_of_lvds_get_dual_link_pixel_order(port1, port2); > - of_node_put(port1); > - of_node_put(port2); > - > if (dual_link < 0) > return dev_err_probe(dev, dual_link, > "Error getting dual link configuration\n"); -- Regards, Laurent Pinchart