From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>, Andy Shevchenko <andy@kernel.org>,
Arnd Bergmann <arnd@kernel.org>, Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>,
Juergen Gross <jgross@suse.com>,
"H . Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>,
Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
Mike Rapoport <rppt@kernel.org>,
Paul Menzel <pmenzel@molgen.mpg.de>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
David Woodhouse <dwmw@amazon.co.uk>
Subject: [PATCH 24/32] x86/boot/e820: Standardize __init/__initdata tag placement
Date: Thu, 15 May 2025 14:05:40 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20250515120549.2820541-25-mingo@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250515120549.2820541-1-mingo@kernel.org>
So the e820.c file has a hodgepodge of __init and __initdata tag
placements:
static int __init e820_search_gap(unsigned long *max_gap_start, unsigned long *max_gap_size)
__init void e820__setup_pci_gap(void)
__init void e820__reallocate_tables(void)
void __init e820__memory_setup_extended(u64 phys_addr, u32 data_len)
void __init e820__register_nosave_regions(unsigned long limit_pfn)
static int __init e820__register_nvs_regions(void)
u64 __init e820__memblock_alloc_reserved(u64 size, u64 align)
Standardize on the style used by e820__setup_pci_gap() and place
them before the storage class.
In addition to the consistency, as a bonus this makes the grep output
rather clean looking:
__init void e820__range_remove(u64 start, u64 size, enum e820_type filter_type)
__init void e820__update_table_print(void)
__init static void e820__update_table_kexec(void)
__init static int e820_search_gap(unsigned long *max_gap_start, unsigned long *max_gap_size)
__init void e820__setup_pci_gap(void)
__init void e820__reallocate_tables(void)
__init void e820__memory_setup_extended(u64 phys_addr, u32 data_len)
__init void e820__register_nosave_regions(unsigned long limit_pfn)
__init static int e820__register_nvs_regions(void)
... and if one learns to just ignore the leftmost '__init' noise then
the rest of the line looks just like a regular C function definition.
With the 'mixed' tag placement style the __init tag breaks up the function's
prototype for no good reason.
Do the same for __initdata.
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
Cc: Andy Shevchenko <andy@kernel.org>
Cc: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@kernel.org>
Cc: David Woodhouse <dwmw@amazon.co.uk>
Cc: H. Peter Anvin <hpa@zytor.com>
Cc: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Mike Rapoport (Microsoft) <rppt@kernel.org>
---
arch/x86/kernel/e820.c | 92 +++++++++++++++++++++++++-------------------------
1 file changed, 46 insertions(+), 46 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/e820.c b/arch/x86/kernel/e820.c
index 7c27661d0e41..447f8bbb77b8 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/e820.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/e820.c
@@ -54,9 +54,9 @@
* re-propagated. So its main role is a temporary bootstrap storage of firmware
* specific memory layout data during early bootup.
*/
-static struct e820_table e820_table_init __initdata;
-static struct e820_table e820_table_kexec_init __initdata;
-static struct e820_table e820_table_firmware_init __initdata;
+__initdata static struct e820_table e820_table_init;
+__initdata static struct e820_table e820_table_kexec_init;
+__initdata static struct e820_table e820_table_firmware_init;
__refdata struct e820_table *e820_table = &e820_table_init;
__refdata struct e820_table *e820_table_kexec = &e820_table_kexec_init;
@@ -143,7 +143,7 @@ static struct e820_entry *__e820__mapped_all(u64 start, u64 end,
/*
* This function checks if the entire range <start,end> is mapped with type.
*/
-bool __init e820__mapped_all(u64 start, u64 end, enum e820_type type)
+__init bool e820__mapped_all(u64 start, u64 end, enum e820_type type)
{
return __e820__mapped_all(start, end, type);
}
@@ -161,7 +161,7 @@ int e820__get_entry_type(u64 start, u64 end)
/*
* Add a memory region to the kernel E820 map.
*/
-static void __init __e820__range_add(struct e820_table *table, u64 start, u64 size, enum e820_type type)
+__init static void __e820__range_add(struct e820_table *table, u64 start, u64 size, enum e820_type type)
{
u32 idx = table->nr_entries;
struct e820_entry *entry_new;
@@ -181,12 +181,12 @@ static void __init __e820__range_add(struct e820_table *table, u64 start, u64 si
table->nr_entries++;
}
-void __init e820__range_add(u64 start, u64 size, enum e820_type type)
+__init void e820__range_add(u64 start, u64 size, enum e820_type type)
{
__e820__range_add(e820_table, start, size, type);
}
-static void __init e820_print_type(enum e820_type type)
+__init static void e820_print_type(enum e820_type type)
{
switch (type) {
case E820_TYPE_RAM: pr_cont(" System RAM"); break;
@@ -236,7 +236,7 @@ static void e820_print_size(u64 size)
pr_cont(" %4llu TB", size/SZ_1T);
}
-static void __init e820__print_table(const char *who)
+__init static void e820__print_table(const char *who)
{
u64 range_end_prev = 0;
u32 idx;
@@ -343,12 +343,12 @@ struct change_member {
u64 addr;
};
-static struct change_member change_point_list[2*E820_MAX_ENTRIES] __initdata;
-static struct change_member *change_point[2*E820_MAX_ENTRIES] __initdata;
-static struct e820_entry *overlap_list[E820_MAX_ENTRIES] __initdata;
-static struct e820_entry new_entries[E820_MAX_ENTRIES] __initdata;
+__initdata static struct change_member change_point_list[2*E820_MAX_ENTRIES];
+__initdata static struct change_member *change_point[2*E820_MAX_ENTRIES];
+__initdata static struct e820_entry *overlap_list[E820_MAX_ENTRIES];
+__initdata static struct e820_entry new_entries[E820_MAX_ENTRIES];
-static int __init cpcompare(const void *a, const void *b)
+__init static int cpcompare(const void *a, const void *b)
{
struct change_member * const *app = a, * const *bpp = b;
const struct change_member *ap = *app, *bp = *bpp;
@@ -383,7 +383,7 @@ static bool e820_type_mergeable(enum e820_type type)
return true;
}
-int __init e820__update_table(struct e820_table *table)
+__init int e820__update_table(struct e820_table *table)
{
struct e820_entry *entries = table->entries;
u32 max_nr_entries = ARRAY_SIZE(table->entries);
@@ -483,7 +483,7 @@ int __init e820__update_table(struct e820_table *table)
return 0;
}
-static int __init __append_e820_table(struct boot_e820_entry *entries, u32 nr_entries)
+__init static int __append_e820_table(struct boot_e820_entry *entries, u32 nr_entries)
{
struct boot_e820_entry *entry = entries;
@@ -514,7 +514,7 @@ static int __init __append_e820_table(struct boot_e820_entry *entries, u32 nr_en
* will have given us a memory map that we can use to properly
* set up memory. If we aren't, we'll fake a memory map.
*/
-static int __init append_e820_table(struct boot_e820_entry *entries, u32 nr_entries)
+__init static int append_e820_table(struct boot_e820_entry *entries, u32 nr_entries)
{
/* Only one memory region (or negative)? Ignore it */
if (nr_entries < 2)
@@ -523,7 +523,7 @@ static int __init append_e820_table(struct boot_e820_entry *entries, u32 nr_entr
return __append_e820_table(entries, nr_entries);
}
-static u64 __init
+__init static u64
__e820__range_update(struct e820_table *table, u64 start, u64 size, enum e820_type old_type, enum e820_type new_type)
{
u64 end;
@@ -591,19 +591,19 @@ __e820__range_update(struct e820_table *table, u64 start, u64 size, enum e820_ty
return real_updated_size;
}
-u64 __init e820__range_update(u64 start, u64 size, enum e820_type old_type, enum e820_type new_type)
+__init u64 e820__range_update(u64 start, u64 size, enum e820_type old_type, enum e820_type new_type)
{
return __e820__range_update(e820_table, start, size, old_type, new_type);
}
-u64 __init e820__range_update_table(struct e820_table *t, u64 start, u64 size,
+__init u64 e820__range_update_table(struct e820_table *t, u64 start, u64 size,
enum e820_type old_type, enum e820_type new_type)
{
return __e820__range_update(t, start, size, old_type, new_type);
}
/* Remove a range of memory from the E820 table: */
-u64 __init e820__range_remove(u64 start, u64 size, enum e820_type old_type, bool check_type)
+__init u64 e820__range_remove(u64 start, u64 size, enum e820_type old_type, bool check_type)
{
u32 idx;
u64 end;
@@ -664,7 +664,7 @@ u64 __init e820__range_remove(u64 start, u64 size, enum e820_type old_type, bool
return real_removed_size;
}
-void __init e820__update_table_print(void)
+__init void e820__update_table_print(void)
{
if (e820__update_table(e820_table))
return;
@@ -673,7 +673,7 @@ void __init e820__update_table_print(void)
e820__print_table("modified");
}
-static void __init e820__update_table_kexec(void)
+__init static void e820__update_table_kexec(void)
{
e820__update_table(e820_table_kexec);
}
@@ -683,7 +683,7 @@ static void __init e820__update_table_kexec(void)
/*
* Search for a gap in the E820 memory space from 0 to MAX_GAP_END (4GB).
*/
-static int __init e820_search_gap(unsigned long *max_gap_start, unsigned long *max_gap_size)
+__init static int e820_search_gap(unsigned long *max_gap_start, unsigned long *max_gap_size)
{
u64 last = MAX_GAP_END;
int idx = e820_table->nr_entries;
@@ -786,7 +786,7 @@ __init void e820__reallocate_tables(void)
* the remaining (if any) entries are passed via the SETUP_E820_EXT node of
* struct setup_data, which is parsed here.
*/
-void __init e820__memory_setup_extended(u64 phys_addr, u32 data_len)
+__init void e820__memory_setup_extended(u64 phys_addr, u32 data_len)
{
int entries;
struct boot_e820_entry *extmap;
@@ -815,7 +815,7 @@ void __init e820__memory_setup_extended(u64 phys_addr, u32 data_len)
* This function requires the E820 map to be sorted and without any
* overlapping entries.
*/
-void __init e820__register_nosave_regions(unsigned long limit_pfn)
+__init void e820__register_nosave_regions(unsigned long limit_pfn)
{
u32 idx;
u64 last_addr = 0;
@@ -840,7 +840,7 @@ void __init e820__register_nosave_regions(unsigned long limit_pfn)
* Register ACPI NVS memory regions, so that we can save/restore them during
* hibernation and the subsequent resume:
*/
-static int __init e820__register_nvs_regions(void)
+__init static int e820__register_nvs_regions(void)
{
u32 idx;
@@ -864,7 +864,7 @@ core_initcall(e820__register_nvs_regions);
* This allows kexec to fake a new mptable, as if it came from the real
* system.
*/
-u64 __init e820__memblock_alloc_reserved(u64 size, u64 align)
+__init u64 e820__memblock_alloc_reserved(u64 size, u64 align)
{
u64 addr;
@@ -891,7 +891,7 @@ u64 __init e820__memblock_alloc_reserved(u64 size, u64 align)
/*
* Find the highest page frame number we have available
*/
-static unsigned long __init e820__end_ram_pfn(unsigned long limit_pfn)
+__init static unsigned long e820__end_ram_pfn(unsigned long limit_pfn)
{
u32 idx;
unsigned long last_pfn = 0;
@@ -927,20 +927,20 @@ static unsigned long __init e820__end_ram_pfn(unsigned long limit_pfn)
return last_pfn;
}
-unsigned long __init e820__end_of_ram_pfn(void)
+__init unsigned long e820__end_of_ram_pfn(void)
{
return e820__end_ram_pfn(MAX_ARCH_PFN);
}
-unsigned long __init e820__end_of_low_ram_pfn(void)
+__init unsigned long e820__end_of_low_ram_pfn(void)
{
return e820__end_ram_pfn(1UL << (32 - PAGE_SHIFT));
}
-static int userdef __initdata;
+__initdata static int userdef;
/* The "mem=nopentium" boot option disables 4MB page tables on 32-bit kernels: */
-static int __init parse_memopt(char *p)
+__init static int parse_memopt(char *p)
{
u64 mem_size;
@@ -974,7 +974,7 @@ static int __init parse_memopt(char *p)
}
early_param("mem", parse_memopt);
-static int __init parse_memmap_one(char *p)
+__init static int parse_memmap_one(char *p)
{
char *oldp;
u64 start_at, mem_size;
@@ -1031,7 +1031,7 @@ static int __init parse_memmap_one(char *p)
return *p == '\0' ? 0 : -EINVAL;
}
-static int __init parse_memmap_opt(char *str)
+__init static int parse_memmap_opt(char *str)
{
while (str) {
char *k = strchr(str, ',');
@@ -1052,7 +1052,7 @@ early_param("memmap", parse_memmap_opt);
* have been processed, in which case we already have an E820 table filled in
* via the parameter callback function(s), but it's not sorted and printed yet:
*/
-void __init e820__finish_early_params(void)
+__init void e820__finish_early_params(void)
{
if (userdef) {
if (e820__update_table(e820_table) < 0)
@@ -1063,7 +1063,7 @@ void __init e820__finish_early_params(void)
}
}
-static const char *__init e820_type_to_string(struct e820_entry *entry)
+__init static const char * e820_type_to_string(struct e820_entry *entry)
{
switch (entry->type) {
case E820_TYPE_RAM: return "System RAM";
@@ -1078,7 +1078,7 @@ static const char *__init e820_type_to_string(struct e820_entry *entry)
}
}
-static unsigned long __init e820_type_to_iomem_type(struct e820_entry *entry)
+__init static unsigned long e820_type_to_iomem_type(struct e820_entry *entry)
{
switch (entry->type) {
case E820_TYPE_RAM: return IORESOURCE_SYSTEM_RAM;
@@ -1093,7 +1093,7 @@ static unsigned long __init e820_type_to_iomem_type(struct e820_entry *entry)
}
}
-static unsigned long __init e820_type_to_iores_desc(struct e820_entry *entry)
+__init static unsigned long e820_type_to_iores_desc(struct e820_entry *entry)
{
switch (entry->type) {
case E820_TYPE_ACPI: return IORES_DESC_ACPI_TABLES;
@@ -1111,13 +1111,13 @@ static unsigned long __init e820_type_to_iores_desc(struct e820_entry *entry)
/*
* We assign one resource entry for each E820 map entry:
*/
-static struct resource __initdata *e820_res;
+__initdata static struct resource *e820_res;
/*
* Is this a device address region that should not be marked busy?
* (Versus system address regions that we register & lock early.)
*/
-static bool __init e820_device_region(enum e820_type type, struct resource *res)
+__init static bool e820_device_region(enum e820_type type, struct resource *res)
{
/* This is the legacy BIOS/DOS ROM-shadow + MMIO region: */
if (res->start < (1ULL<<20))
@@ -1146,7 +1146,7 @@ static bool __init e820_device_region(enum e820_type type, struct resource *res)
/*
* Mark E820 system regions as busy for the resource manager:
*/
-void __init e820__reserve_resources(void)
+__init void e820__reserve_resources(void)
{
u32 idx;
struct resource *res;
@@ -1193,7 +1193,7 @@ void __init e820__reserve_resources(void)
/*
* How much should we pad the end of RAM, depending on where it is?
*/
-static unsigned long __init ram_alignment(resource_size_t pos)
+__init static unsigned long ram_alignment(resource_size_t pos)
{
unsigned long mb = pos >> 20;
@@ -1211,7 +1211,7 @@ static unsigned long __init ram_alignment(resource_size_t pos)
#define MAX_RESOURCE_SIZE ((resource_size_t)-1)
-void __init e820__reserve_resources_late(void)
+__init void e820__reserve_resources_late(void)
{
u32 idx;
struct resource *res;
@@ -1261,7 +1261,7 @@ void __init e820__reserve_resources_late(void)
/*
* Pass the firmware (bootloader) E820 map to the kernel and process it:
*/
-char *__init e820__memory_setup_default(void)
+__init char * e820__memory_setup_default(void)
{
char *who = "BIOS-e820";
@@ -1299,7 +1299,7 @@ char *__init e820__memory_setup_default(void)
* E820 map - with an optional platform quirk available for virtual platforms
* to override this method of boot environment processing:
*/
-void __init e820__memory_setup(void)
+__init void e820__memory_setup(void)
{
char *who;
@@ -1315,7 +1315,7 @@ void __init e820__memory_setup(void)
e820__print_table(who);
}
-void __init e820__memblock_setup(void)
+__init void e820__memblock_setup(void)
{
u32 idx;
u64 end;
--
2.45.2
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-05-15 12:07 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 77+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-05-15 12:05 [PATCH -v2 00/32] x86/boot/e820: Assorted E820 table handling features and cleanups Ingo Molnar
2025-05-15 12:05 ` [PATCH 01/32] x86/boot/e820: Remove inverted boolean logic from the e820_nomerge() function name, rename it to e820_type_mergeable() Ingo Molnar
2025-06-02 11:21 ` Nikolay Borisov
2025-12-14 8:37 ` [tip: x86/boot] " tip-bot2 for Ingo Molnar
2025-05-15 12:05 ` [PATCH 02/32] x86/boot/e820: Simplify e820__print_table() a bit Ingo Molnar
2025-12-14 8:37 ` [tip: x86/boot] " tip-bot2 for Ingo Molnar
2025-05-15 12:05 ` [PATCH 03/32] x86/boot/e820: Simplify the PPro Erratum #50 workaround Ingo Molnar
2025-12-14 8:37 ` [tip: x86/boot] " tip-bot2 for Ingo Molnar
2025-05-15 12:05 ` [PATCH 04/32] x86/boot/e820: Mark e820__print_table() static Ingo Molnar
2025-12-14 8:37 ` [tip: x86/boot] " tip-bot2 for Ingo Molnar
2025-05-15 12:05 ` [PATCH 05/32] x86/boot/e820: Print gaps in the E820 table Ingo Molnar
2025-12-14 8:37 ` [tip: x86/boot] " tip-bot2 for Ingo Molnar
2025-05-15 12:05 ` [PATCH 06/32] x86/boot/e820: Make the field separator space character part of e820_print_type() Ingo Molnar
2025-12-14 8:37 ` [tip: x86/boot] " tip-bot2 for Ingo Molnar
2025-05-15 12:05 ` [PATCH 07/32] x86/boot/e820: Print out sizes of E820 memory ranges Ingo Molnar
2025-05-19 12:26 ` Andy Shevchenko
2025-05-31 18:21 ` Ingo Molnar
2025-05-15 12:05 ` [PATCH 08/32] x86/boot/e820: Print E820_TYPE_RAM entries as ... RAM entries Ingo Molnar
2025-12-14 8:37 ` [tip: x86/boot] " tip-bot2 for Ingo Molnar
2025-05-15 12:05 ` [PATCH 09/32] x86/boot/e820: Call the PCI gap a 'gap' in the boot log printout Ingo Molnar
2025-05-19 12:27 ` Andy Shevchenko
2025-05-31 18:09 ` Ingo Molnar
2025-12-14 8:37 ` [tip: x86/boot] " tip-bot2 for Ingo Molnar
2025-05-15 12:05 ` [PATCH 10/32] x86/boot/e820: Use 'u64' consistently instead of 'unsigned long long' Ingo Molnar
2025-12-14 8:37 ` [tip: x86/boot] " tip-bot2 for Ingo Molnar
2025-05-15 12:05 ` [PATCH 11/32] x86/boot/e820: Remove pointless early_panic() indirection Ingo Molnar
2025-12-14 8:37 ` [tip: x86/boot] " tip-bot2 for Ingo Molnar
2025-05-15 12:05 ` [PATCH 12/32] x86/boot/e820: Clean up confusing and self-contradictory verbiage around E820 related resource allocations Ingo Molnar
2025-06-02 11:45 ` Nikolay Borisov
2025-12-14 8:26 ` [PATCH 33/32] x86/boot/e820: Use <linux/sizes.h> symbols for literals Ingo Molnar
2025-12-14 8:37 ` [tip: x86/boot] " tip-bot2 for Ingo Molnar
2025-12-14 8:37 ` [tip: x86/boot] x86/boot/e820: Clean up confusing and self-contradictory verbiage around E820 related resource allocations tip-bot2 for Ingo Molnar
2025-05-15 12:05 ` [PATCH 13/32] x86/boot/e820: Improve e820_print_type() messages Ingo Molnar
2025-12-14 8:37 ` [tip: x86/boot] " tip-bot2 for Ingo Molnar
2025-05-15 12:05 ` [PATCH 14/32] x86/boot/e820: Clean up __e820__range_add() a bit Ingo Molnar
2025-12-14 8:37 ` [tip: x86/boot] " tip-bot2 for Ingo Molnar
2025-05-15 12:05 ` [PATCH 15/32] x86/boot/e820: Clean up __refdata use " Ingo Molnar
2025-12-14 8:37 ` [tip: x86/boot] " tip-bot2 for Ingo Molnar
2025-05-15 12:05 ` [PATCH 16/32] x86/boot/e820: Remove unnecessary header inclusions Ingo Molnar
2025-12-14 8:37 ` [tip: x86/boot] " tip-bot2 for Ingo Molnar
2025-05-15 12:05 ` [PATCH 17/32] x86/boot/e820: Standardize e820 table index variable names under 'idx' Ingo Molnar
2025-06-02 12:37 ` Nikolay Borisov
2025-12-14 8:37 ` [tip: x86/boot] " tip-bot2 for Ingo Molnar
2025-05-15 12:05 ` [PATCH 18/32] x86/boot/e820: Standardize e820 table index variable types under 'u32' Ingo Molnar
2025-12-14 8:37 ` [tip: x86/boot] " tip-bot2 for Ingo Molnar
2025-05-15 12:05 ` [PATCH 19/32] x86/boot/e820: Change struct e820_table::nr_entries type from __u32 to u32 Ingo Molnar
2025-12-14 8:37 ` [tip: x86/boot] " tip-bot2 for Ingo Molnar
2025-05-15 12:05 ` [PATCH 20/32] x86/boot/e820: Clean up e820__setup_pci_gap()/e820_search_gap() a bit Ingo Molnar
2025-06-02 12:41 ` Nikolay Borisov
2025-12-14 8:37 ` [tip: x86/boot] " tip-bot2 for Ingo Molnar
2025-05-15 12:05 ` [PATCH 21/32] x86/boot/e820: Change e820_search_gap() to search for the highest-address PCI gap Ingo Molnar
2025-12-14 8:37 ` [tip: x86/boot] " tip-bot2 for Ingo Molnar
2025-05-15 12:05 ` [PATCH 22/32] x86/boot/e820: Rename gap_start/gap_size to max_gap_start/max_gap_start in e820_search_gap() et al Ingo Molnar
2025-12-14 8:37 ` [tip: x86/boot] " tip-bot2 for Ingo Molnar
2025-05-15 12:05 ` [PATCH 23/32] x86/boot/e820: Simplify & clarify __e820__range_add() a bit Ingo Molnar
2025-12-14 8:37 ` [tip: x86/boot] " tip-bot2 for Ingo Molnar
2025-05-15 12:05 ` Ingo Molnar [this message]
2025-12-14 8:37 ` [tip: x86/boot] x86/boot/e820: Standardize __init/__initdata tag placement tip-bot2 for Ingo Molnar
2025-05-15 12:05 ` [PATCH 25/32] x86/boot/e820: Simplify append_e820_table() and remove restriction on single-entry tables Ingo Molnar
2025-06-02 12:50 ` Nikolay Borisov
2025-06-02 12:57 ` Andy Shevchenko
2025-12-14 8:37 ` [tip: x86/boot] " tip-bot2 for Ingo Molnar
2025-05-15 12:05 ` [PATCH 26/32] x86/boot/e820: Remove e820__range_remove()'s unused return parameter Ingo Molnar
2025-12-14 8:37 ` [tip: x86/boot] " tip-bot2 for Ingo Molnar
2025-05-15 12:05 ` [PATCH 27/32] x86/boot/e820: Simplify the e820__range_remove() API Ingo Molnar
2025-12-14 8:37 ` [tip: x86/boot] " tip-bot2 for Ingo Molnar
2025-05-15 12:05 ` [PATCH 28/32] x86/boot/e820: Make sure e820_search_gap() finds all gaps Ingo Molnar
2025-06-02 14:49 ` Nikolay Borisov
2025-12-14 8:37 ` [tip: x86/boot] " tip-bot2 for Ingo Molnar
2025-05-15 12:05 ` [PATCH 29/32] x86/boot/e820: Introduce E820_TYPE_13 and treat it as a device region Ingo Molnar
2025-05-15 12:05 ` [PATCH 30/32] x86/boot/e820: Change e820_type_to_string() to take a 'type' parameter Ingo Molnar
2025-05-15 12:05 ` [PATCH 31/32] x86/boot/e820: Unify e820_print_type() and e820_type_to_string() Ingo Molnar
2025-05-15 12:05 ` [PATCH 32/32] x86/boot/e820: Move index increments outside accessors in e820__update_table() Ingo Molnar
2025-05-16 18:17 ` H. Peter Anvin
2025-05-17 13:13 ` Ingo Molnar
2025-06-02 14:57 ` Nikolay Borisov
2025-12-14 8:26 ` Ingo Molnar
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20250515120549.2820541-25-mingo@kernel.org \
--to=mingo@kernel.org \
--cc=andy@kernel.org \
--cc=arnd@kernel.org \
--cc=bp@alien8.de \
--cc=dwmw@amazon.co.uk \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=jgross@suse.com \
--cc=keescook@chromium.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=pmenzel@molgen.mpg.de \
--cc=rppt@kernel.org \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
Powered by JetHome