From: Andrea Righi <arighi@nvidia.com>
To: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>, David Vernet <void@manifault.com>,
Changwoo Min <changwoo@igalia.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH 3/4] sched_ext: idle: Allow scx_bpf_select_cpu_and() from unlocked context
Date: Thu, 15 May 2025 21:11:44 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20250515191716.327518-4-arighi@nvidia.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250515191716.327518-1-arighi@nvidia.com>
Allow scx_bpf_select_cpu_and() to be used from an unlocked context, in
addition to ops.enqueue() or ops.select_cpu().
This enables schedulers, including user-space ones, to implement a
consistent idle CPU selection policy and helps reduce code duplication.
Signed-off-by: Andrea Righi <arighi@nvidia.com>
---
kernel/sched/ext_idle.c | 37 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++----------
1 file changed, 27 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
diff --git a/kernel/sched/ext_idle.c b/kernel/sched/ext_idle.c
index 716863f1f8cee..37279a09900ca 100644
--- a/kernel/sched/ext_idle.c
+++ b/kernel/sched/ext_idle.c
@@ -922,9 +922,10 @@ __bpf_kfunc s32 scx_bpf_select_cpu_dfl(struct task_struct *p, s32 prev_cpu,
* @cpus_allowed: cpumask of allowed CPUs
* @flags: %SCX_PICK_IDLE* flags
*
- * Can only be called from ops.select_cpu() or ops.enqueue() if the
- * built-in CPU selection is enabled: ops.update_idle() is missing or
- * %SCX_OPS_KEEP_BUILTIN_IDLE is set.
+ * Can be called from ops.select_cpu(), ops.enqueue(), or from an unlocked
+ * context such as a BPF test_run() call, as long as built-in CPU selection
+ * is enabled: ops.update_idle() is missing or %SCX_OPS_KEEP_BUILTIN_IDLE
+ * is set.
*
* @p, @prev_cpu and @wake_flags match ops.select_cpu().
*
@@ -936,6 +937,7 @@ __bpf_kfunc s32 scx_bpf_select_cpu_and(struct task_struct *p, s32 prev_cpu, u64
const struct cpumask *cpus_allowed, u64 flags)
{
struct rq *rq;
+ struct rq_flags rf;
s32 cpu;
if (!kf_cpu_valid(prev_cpu, NULL))
@@ -944,15 +946,26 @@ __bpf_kfunc s32 scx_bpf_select_cpu_and(struct task_struct *p, s32 prev_cpu, u64
if (!check_builtin_idle_enabled())
return -EBUSY;
- if (!scx_kf_allowed(SCX_KF_SELECT_CPU | SCX_KF_ENQUEUE))
- return -EPERM;
+ /*
+ * If called from an unlocked context, acquire the task's rq lock,
+ * so that we can safely access p->cpus_ptr and p->nr_cpus_allowed.
+ *
+ * Otherwise, allow to use this kfunc only from ops.select_cpu()
+ * and ops.select_enqueue().
+ */
+ if (scx_kf_allowed_if_unlocked()) {
+ rq = task_rq_lock(p, &rf);
+ } else {
+ if (!scx_kf_allowed(SCX_KF_SELECT_CPU | SCX_KF_ENQUEUE))
+ return -EPERM;
+ rq = scx_locked_rq();
+ }
/*
* Validate locking correctness to access p->cpus_ptr and
* p->nr_cpus_allowed: if we're holding an rq lock, we're safe;
* otherwise, assert that p->pi_lock is held.
*/
- rq = scx_locked_rq();
if (!rq)
lockdep_assert_held(&p->pi_lock);
@@ -966,13 +979,17 @@ __bpf_kfunc s32 scx_bpf_select_cpu_and(struct task_struct *p, s32 prev_cpu, u64
if (p->nr_cpus_allowed == 1) {
if (cpumask_test_cpu(prev_cpu, cpus_allowed) &&
scx_idle_test_and_clear_cpu(prev_cpu))
- return prev_cpu;
- return -EBUSY;
+ cpu = prev_cpu;
+ else
+ cpu = -EBUSY;
+ } else {
+ cpu = scx_select_cpu_dfl(p, prev_cpu, wake_flags, cpus_allowed, flags);
}
- cpu = scx_select_cpu_dfl(p, prev_cpu, wake_flags, cpus_allowed, flags);
#else
cpu = -EBUSY;
#endif
+ if (scx_kf_allowed_if_unlocked())
+ task_rq_unlock(rq, p, &rf);
return cpu;
}
@@ -1276,6 +1293,7 @@ BTF_ID_FLAGS(func, scx_bpf_pick_idle_cpu_node, KF_RCU)
BTF_ID_FLAGS(func, scx_bpf_pick_idle_cpu, KF_RCU)
BTF_ID_FLAGS(func, scx_bpf_pick_any_cpu_node, KF_RCU)
BTF_ID_FLAGS(func, scx_bpf_pick_any_cpu, KF_RCU)
+BTF_ID_FLAGS(func, scx_bpf_select_cpu_and, KF_RCU)
BTF_KFUNCS_END(scx_kfunc_ids_idle)
static const struct btf_kfunc_id_set scx_kfunc_set_idle = {
@@ -1285,7 +1303,6 @@ static const struct btf_kfunc_id_set scx_kfunc_set_idle = {
BTF_KFUNCS_START(scx_kfunc_ids_select_cpu)
BTF_ID_FLAGS(func, scx_bpf_select_cpu_dfl, KF_RCU)
-BTF_ID_FLAGS(func, scx_bpf_select_cpu_and, KF_RCU)
BTF_KFUNCS_END(scx_kfunc_ids_select_cpu)
static const struct btf_kfunc_id_set scx_kfunc_set_select_cpu = {
--
2.49.0
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-05-15 19:17 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-05-15 19:11 [PATCHSET v2 sched_ext/for-6.16] sched_ext: Extend usability of scx_bpf_select_cpu_and() Andrea Righi
2025-05-15 19:11 ` [PATCH 1/4] sched_ext: Make scx_kf_allowed_if_unlocked() available outside ext.c Andrea Righi
2025-05-15 19:11 ` [PATCH 2/4] sched_ext: idle: Validate locking correctness in scx_bpf_select_cpu_and() Andrea Righi
2025-05-15 19:11 ` Andrea Righi [this message]
2025-05-17 17:54 ` [PATCH 3/4] sched_ext: idle: Allow scx_bpf_select_cpu_and() from unlocked context David Vernet
2025-05-17 22:50 ` Andrea Righi
2025-05-18 0:40 ` David Vernet
2025-05-18 5:52 ` Andrea Righi
2025-05-18 13:49 ` David Vernet
2025-05-15 19:11 ` [PATCH 4/4] selftests/sched_ext: Add test for scx_bpf_select_cpu_and() via test_run Andrea Righi
2025-05-19 18:02 ` [PATCHSET v2 sched_ext/for-6.16] sched_ext: Extend usability of scx_bpf_select_cpu_and() Tejun Heo
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20250515191716.327518-4-arighi@nvidia.com \
--to=arighi@nvidia.com \
--cc=changwoo@igalia.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=tj@kernel.org \
--cc=void@manifault.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®