From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-1.web.codeaurora.org [10.30.226.201]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5F4A8231836; Fri, 16 May 2025 09:45:27 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1747388728; cv=none; b=nPxj79JKppEJHBicTwAe/4Z0/IWF+LOL8fC1rdWYCN4pvpZiZeQLqhOr4ayogktSM8rjgCuezlFmbAEthk4pQzI5KJV/8keLKvyWLR/HLe5crqwPFzuja8UqFw5xzHnDv0RZ3XdeOxcUhsJ+n5u4MnOdAS4FQ6EFvCHCfXWSNNc= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1747388728; c=relaxed/simple; bh=e7yeGEXq5WaeIQNIW/XccMU2VpxH4/y2FhBYeVBRQOE=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=lu2dFgBQOzSsytTGfXpWkj1uwOve+ldS9GP6XyyWK3kOycTAyigJCA/Uf3qBHzHtCtlyBDg6FUjLRXuNviqklZXWe3V240C6QeDluCLi1zrtn+HRwEjYyW8haoK52eIFukSHXDJ5OcMQ0yswhrKgYwaPmAX2NGM2TkLi1wuFAYg= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b=jhboFUdo; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b="jhboFUdo" Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 42F82C4CEE4; Fri, 16 May 2025 09:45:25 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=k20201202; t=1747388727; bh=e7yeGEXq5WaeIQNIW/XccMU2VpxH4/y2FhBYeVBRQOE=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=jhboFUdoo1SKe0onXbXMqjUq/0n3vJPyHaXVBFWy/EXuNA6OA4D4i1g9SUe8vuBU6 3um4des1zzGAkv3wZBrhBIZ45Xz8OqQoEfBBs0iMEq/YV+bzanYe9sOhStjD23D7yi mFHbiORuReuH3VtgTV6WakEvr7YFBXzQR/l+5VwJ+oeuZXJhyBy808H0AY9YxnBftF eeKadRTRcKa3tRxRo7PAQ6R6olrpYlb1KYy9OREmCu5hHwVdNL3cf4CLfcAqlRI46L ePg3NzhqatwTVveecTU0aeeT9blYsP+ZI+EjUqNAYP2QoD5wdCyULuXJ+pG2v/Pe4C J1LaHCLQYzlFQ== Date: Fri, 16 May 2025 10:45:23 +0100 From: Simon Horman To: Faizal Rahim Cc: Tony Nguyen , Przemek Kitszel , Andrew Lunn , "David S . Miller" , Eric Dumazet , Jakub Kicinski , Paolo Abeni , Vladimir Oltean , intel-wired-lan@lists.osuosl.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Aleksandr Loktionov , Chwee-Lin Choong Subject: Re: [PATCH iwl-next v2 5/8] igc: add private flag to reverse TX queue priority in TSN mode Message-ID: <20250516094523.GM1898636@horms.kernel.org> References: <20250514042945.2685273-1-faizal.abdul.rahim@linux.intel.com> <20250514042945.2685273-6-faizal.abdul.rahim@linux.intel.com> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20250514042945.2685273-6-faizal.abdul.rahim@linux.intel.com> On Wed, May 14, 2025 at 12:29:42AM -0400, Faizal Rahim wrote: > By default, igc assigns TX hw queue 0 the highest priority and queue 3 > the lowest. This is opposite of most NICs, where TX hw queue 3 has the > highest priority and queue 0 the lowest. ... > Signed-off-by: Faizal Rahim Reviewed-by: Simon Horman