From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mail-yb1-f172.google.com (mail-yb1-f172.google.com [209.85.219.172]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id DED60262D29; Tue, 20 May 2025 18:11:28 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=209.85.219.172 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1747764690; cv=none; b=G7Ww2vasxuqFpH0YW87bd0XhchgV5sGhdZBbIaL9BRR9l10N6lwHBQ2zUEPRb6JzKN21drXlwxxzqXvuALDHmTMi4FIegrANmE2DITwsMkVCToL4Hujmtzt4Dlbjyx0+Uwf7dQFhTPr+AdEaFfm/Bk6N8Bllm5J0VxVcMaTpFmc= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1747764690; c=relaxed/simple; bh=twrW7/08eCVa9qptJqhegLazELCJFFEPNWRhDI8Zpxs=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:Message-ID:In-Reply-To:References: MIME-Version; b=YWXdE2vme0JiKJ6gwXhsmN0WbZnYFOMvaeqFlqJTNdlYnh8yZB7dfpQDEFJkZQh69RtHz36R+/Dt9mCXybePa1e0cac7wXTjvx1/eAZTgSmNgmaDgDFDGcO0Br4Y139ymwkNU6aTVJk03S4abgX0R5RBWrqgyH2i76SjKz67oS4= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=gmail.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=gmail.com; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com header.i=@gmail.com header.b=IY/9Konu; arc=none smtp.client-ip=209.85.219.172 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=gmail.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=gmail.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com header.i=@gmail.com header.b="IY/9Konu" Received: by mail-yb1-f172.google.com with SMTP id 3f1490d57ef6-e733cd55f9eso5821491276.1; Tue, 20 May 2025 11:11:28 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20230601; t=1747764688; x=1748369488; darn=vger.kernel.org; h=content-transfer-encoding:mime-version:references:in-reply-to :message-id:date:subject:cc:to:from:from:to:cc:subject:date :message-id:reply-to; bh=sNiU/+iVtGg8iLaaH7gZuUjEVkcmluAtZKRN5PqnkdI=; b=IY/9KonuJBKdavDYRrDb6ZZJBb0/Zc4/XVpSv6q2+qmaIYFzgq2ezfLXYo5RLOYfNY 66QkDOdGJ0rvM2WzBbo7hGRL8YX4s7ypAIfc6XoleakJREl7NEr3n3nPNLaok7bUaUXy Bw7aSkoGnyV7v0sXioxeWunA0A9zi0UzFGx3t8DWyhGaKIsIoIfhGHCwD5X4mtHgKIRb xtT9E1zv30I+NuQrBMY6NNo1WOqcxQHuxzRBeMRVF3ooqL7EvBvVO99To8QLjpnUVPqp IUIaCx116CReh16krsX70ZCjEyPLtKAsRwhJIbxa8eQ/YZD028Gtu80VoPUjqQqXRkOA vewQ== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20230601; t=1747764688; x=1748369488; h=content-transfer-encoding:mime-version:references:in-reply-to :message-id:date:subject:cc:to:from:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc :subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=sNiU/+iVtGg8iLaaH7gZuUjEVkcmluAtZKRN5PqnkdI=; b=vViN4IuFD3aeCPIqxOmHaMvaBInoLbdmOyI91/wuDGeOiwFc8EmMvvCnihb+IsxpLl 4AP/n+r7y0yAPVaNba0SU4XR8rLwJw7rSne9LdE/2NcWSCiAXqN5j8uHp2CNtaFK3tso sfhaK+oboVrylSR/gCy6EjioDX1OzszSu9mYYKdZWDBe6s9Uh2Mbhsr5GUhzwV3/WZIb kN3ZpFWr841HThyzD0kvgZ16+TZXIZPLdNY7Fe8yNjNRjofV8F8rMw8GFh4aHuyNGdYB eOQmvLVuHITb1tWG2aewDm3LNRpAL5M1RxIufx+Rq87PRMlnd9603UXrV2v9GfaDvFFR +2hw== X-Forwarded-Encrypted: i=1; AJvYcCXBayz4/DBpGk2bNLS2vIRAds9IS0ZPWlanK0WGTgH9ojTTEXtraHdsO7pcSAmpLGSKFuXBBWSoGhkV@vger.kernel.org, AJvYcCXD46X2fxORIvKYuC3vYvMI2FR/bLZpr9OyjvxXi2uQViwnQfLhMGQ5pEQE5KEZnrES7Uab64GKq7iJEilD@vger.kernel.org X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0YzkwIsJP5XFBIo58YtiFaoP6CN9gKm7BfhsKhOMr3AKUwQYIRZ8 vbWOPukpJqnhzkyUV7DYtCkwwux/y41YCFjJ4WuWmkhtsPYXJL9IaF4J X-Gm-Gg: ASbGncs+3kOY6cq8EgWcayilcy6CxKk6BmZvs+LBtFUq6K4D2fKC/Hyw4saUUKMpVWe mNI7VkZSQDj9rACtzUKg3bgzuVg/ywPR9h4jMx9pFv4ivqw7FEUJeU5XUu6pEkxToRLPh1aNyoi eu3tJ60miqon9nKDaP1Ewkr4r0zKarzPdmNHyMUDE0oPaMGVvrBAPQeEJ683xvS+fYRvWUEK9Sd KRGFoG4PRmfEut4sSLY1LkORH8PodkO8gCymA6RXqM7viMJtt10xyEaBBbHfBnGpUL9F0sTlurM TsbqcvESq/6YwD34xEC9qV33qK6i+MdEQe6chU3vkmL7xSwcGb4= X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IF9qB2EDGLXol7oTFU3nKmNd6gAUjfzN+l8/6o4+MlEfJcVhohBDS8KzVMsF9an1hJiidQsLA== X-Received: by 2002:a05:6902:478e:b0:e7b:9763:6697 with SMTP id 3f1490d57ef6-e7b97636a09mr14133727276.28.1747764687532; Tue, 20 May 2025 11:11:27 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost ([2a03:2880:25ff:73::]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id 3f1490d57ef6-e7b75568de3sm3303496276.3.2025.05.20.11.11.26 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Tue, 20 May 2025 11:11:27 -0700 (PDT) From: Joshua Hahn To: Andrew Morton Cc: gourry@gourry.net, harry.yoo@oracle.com, ying.huang@linux.alibaba.com, honggyu.kim@sk.com, yunjeong.mun@sk.com, gregkh@linuxfoundation.org, rakie.kim@sk.com, rafael@kernel.org, lenb@kernel.org, dan.j.williams@intel.com, Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com, dave.jiang@intel.com, horen.chuang@linux.dev, hannes@cmpxchg.org, osalvador@suse.de, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org, kernel-team@meta.com Subject: Re: [PATCH v9] mm/mempolicy: Weighted Interleave Auto-tuning Date: Tue, 20 May 2025 11:11:24 -0700 Message-ID: <20250520181125.4155631-1-joshua.hahnjy@gmail.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.47.1 In-Reply-To: <20250520105319.99f3f2f980617e213db6be20@linux-foundation.org> References: Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit On Tue, 20 May 2025 10:53:19 -0700 Andrew Morton wrote: > On Tue, 20 May 2025 07:12:35 -0700 Joshua Hahn wrote: > > > Changelog > > v9: > > - Code cleanups & wordsmithing > > - Added tags for Honggyu and Ying > > Honggyu's Reviewed-by is the only change I'm seeing between v8 and v9, > which is unexpected? > Hello Andrew, The code cleanups & wordsmithing were part of the fixlets that I submitted, so if you are diffing against the version of v8 with the fixlets already in, all you should see as diffs are Honggyu's review and test tag, as well as Ying's review tag. I was not very familiar with the fixlet process, so I imagined that I needed so submit a new fixlet to add the 3 tags. If that is not the case (and you can just change the tags without adding a new fixlet) perhaps we can keep v8, just with the additional tags so we can keep the patch in the unstable branch? Sorry for the confusion and the noise, I am happy with whatever decision you make! Thank you for your help, as always. Joshua