From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from zeniv.linux.org.uk (zeniv.linux.org.uk [62.89.141.173]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A08746A33F for ; Sun, 25 May 2025 21:42:01 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=62.89.141.173 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1748209324; cv=none; b=uqlANFirVk/JjHoIHjXSeJbXjf2CzwYKk6gXYp/4lXxmYtTtCMmC4UvXKOyZs7sGbLdDSn9JMyjNL0/VtJq5DaHoRLC2OnTqiEAdfB92eh1IaBGTZpep+Po1kVoTwi58/tNYayCX4Opmv92JeJzFLWXxB/2dV4+t8+Dt1c/Bpho= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1748209324; c=relaxed/simple; bh=bIyy4YlaAnitmqCYPR8vLW5WxPsArk6HGaEP9Hz2Lvc=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=ul6CktVXkH4vx/5yMPRnPBo85plYhabkgikzX3z8MifyFHxmcvR4+oVd094+SXLulngU7N9/A86+TDksaM+UlnuELx13HKWjPgqaV7DKDj1lVeiAN+b+oh8kFsw6nhIWTPAfXfByjbSoW2OXjmcmLgqN/3pW+f/uKi3JD+huIhQ= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=zeniv.linux.org.uk; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=ftp.linux.org.uk; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=linux.org.uk header.i=@linux.org.uk header.b=r8X3sMkx; arc=none smtp.client-ip=62.89.141.173 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=zeniv.linux.org.uk Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=ftp.linux.org.uk Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=linux.org.uk header.i=@linux.org.uk header.b="r8X3sMkx" DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=linux.org.uk; s=zeniv-20220401; h=Sender:In-Reply-To:Content-Type: MIME-Version:References:Message-ID:Subject:Cc:To:From:Date:Reply-To: Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-ID:Content-Description; bh=jV0eAQuxZquMZkIkG+EEpK9m6zlq0/VxrkCPW29T2/k=; b=r8X3sMkx3XZr+a90ZP8Zbj17ri Sv8sIwIYzGbtTORcCaqrGxKApVm7GNL8UGO7vUbhqL4v2iNK+LkSYQDoTdyKs++Ld6K5nGK8cVoBt wz7NUiRE8I9m6UW4IuO31Dp14vPPxMO5mTgqZjzpQ6JM86JaeJCuwa2Jiv6ZtZaMVIkig2azWCooI 8iipPMdBpX26t7qIpVkJq/3yTlwmWVVHQcJ3HY0adNyRj8IvGux0qkL4x3TR345cs4FKacfJiz13N HRd5DmhUB0ocNiObwcAJT8Vb88AUu6fN13TVnxuYRrSjILPf8DZa4cCdJMhrdRheoBfdrW5MJch3h 6zKhFuWw==; Received: from viro by zeniv.linux.org.uk with local (Exim 4.98.2 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1uJJ6V-00000000PjZ-2G5B; Sun, 25 May 2025 21:41:59 +0000 Date: Sun, 25 May 2025 22:41:59 +0100 From: Al Viro To: Illia Ostapyshyn Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Jan Kiszka , Kieran Bingham , Andrew Morton Subject: Re: [PATCH RESEND] scripts/gdb: Use d_shortname instead of d_iname Message-ID: <20250525214159.GV2023217@ZenIV> References: <20250525213709.878287-2-illia@yshyn.com> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20250525213709.878287-2-illia@yshyn.com> Sender: Al Viro On Sun, May 25, 2025 at 11:37:10PM +0200, Illia Ostapyshyn wrote: > Commit 58cf9c383c5c68666808 ("dcache: back inline names with a > struct-wrapped array of unsigned long") introduced a d_shortname union > in place of d_iname. However, the gdb scripts for vfs still reference > the old field. Update the scripts to reference the correct field and > union member. You do realize that for dentries with names longer than 40 characters that field contains garbage, right?