From: Masami Hiramatsu (Google) <mhiramat@kernel.org>
To: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
Cc: LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Linux Trace Kernel <linux-trace-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@kernel.org>,
Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ring-buffer: Removed unnecessary if() goto out where out is the next line
Date: Wed, 28 May 2025 09:34:55 +0900 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20250528093455.e710b3783bbdc93f8be66625@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250527155116.227f35be@gandalf.local.home>
On Tue, 27 May 2025 15:51:16 -0400
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org> wrote:
> From: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
>
> In the function ring_buffer_discard_commit() there's an if statement that
> jumps to the next line:
>
> if (rb_try_to_discard(cpu_buffer, event))
> goto out;
> out:
>
> This was caused by the change that modified the way timestamps were taken
> in interrupt context, and removed the code between the if statement and
> the goto, but failed to update the conditional logic.
>
OK, so this is a kind of cleanup.
Reviewed-by: Masami Hiramatsu (Google) <mhiramat@kernel.org>
Thanks,
> Fixes: a389d86f7fd0 ("ring-buffer: Have nested events still record running time stamp")
> Signed-off-by: Steven Rostedt (Google) <rostedt@goodmis.org>
> ---
> kernel/trace/ring_buffer.c | 5 +----
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 4 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/kernel/trace/ring_buffer.c b/kernel/trace/ring_buffer.c
> index e2aa90dc8d9e..0a3be3a01d14 100644
> --- a/kernel/trace/ring_buffer.c
> +++ b/kernel/trace/ring_buffer.c
> @@ -4681,10 +4681,7 @@ void ring_buffer_discard_commit(struct trace_buffer *buffer,
> RB_WARN_ON(buffer, !local_read(&cpu_buffer->committing));
>
> rb_decrement_entry(cpu_buffer, event);
> - if (rb_try_to_discard(cpu_buffer, event))
> - goto out;
> -
> - out:
> + rb_try_to_discard(cpu_buffer, event);
> rb_end_commit(cpu_buffer);
>
> trace_recursive_unlock(cpu_buffer);
> --
> 2.47.2
>
--
Masami Hiramatsu (Google) <mhiramat@kernel.org>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-05-28 0:34 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-05-27 19:51 Steven Rostedt
2025-05-28 0:34 ` Masami Hiramatsu [this message]
2025-05-28 16:30 ` Steven Rostedt
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20250528093455.e710b3783bbdc93f8be66625@kernel.org \
--to=mhiramat@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-trace-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®