mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Pawan Gupta <pawan.kumar.gupta@linux.intel.com>
To: Richard Narron <richard@aaazen.com>
Cc: Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net>,
	Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
	Linux stable <stable@vger.kernel.org>,
	Linux kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
	Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 5.15 00/59] 5.15.184-rc1 review
Date: Thu, 29 May 2025 10:40:17 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20250529174017.lwctaondsbg7tk37@desk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <b8a9acaf-3d3e-7931-23ce-d61ee77b4e10@aaazen.com>

On Wed, May 28, 2025 at 09:49:40PM -0700, Richard Narron wrote:
> On Tue, 27 May 2025, Pawan Gupta wrote:
> 
> > On Tue, May 27, 2025 at 12:31:47PM -0700, Richard Narron wrote:
> > > On Fri, 23 May 2025, Guenter Roeck wrote:
> > >
> > > > On 5/20/25 06:49, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> > > > > This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.15.184 release.
> > > > > There are 59 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> > > > > to this one.  If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> > > > > let me know.
> > > > >
> > > > > Responses should be made by Thu, 22 May 2025 12:57:37 +0000.
> > > > > Anything received after that time might be too late.
> > > > >
> > > >
> > > > Build reference: v5.15.184
> > > > Compiler version: x86_64-linux-gcc (GCC) 12.4.0
> > > > Assembler version: GNU assembler (GNU Binutils) 2.40
> > > >
> > > > Configuration file workarounds:
> > > >     "s/CONFIG_FRAME_WARN=.*/CONFIG_FRAME_WARN=0/"
> > > >
> > > > Building i386:defconfig ... passed
> > > > Building i386:allyesconfig ... failed
> > > > --------------
> > > > Error log:
> > > > x86_64-linux-ld: arch/x86/kernel/static_call.o: in function
> > > > `__static_call_transform':
> > > > static_call.c:(.ref.text+0x46): undefined reference to `cpu_wants_rethunk_at'
> > > > make[1]: [Makefile:1234: vmlinux] Error 1 (ignored)
> > > > --------------
> > > > Building i386:allmodconfig ... failed
> > > > --------------
> > > > Error log:
> > > > x86_64-linux-ld: arch/x86/kernel/static_call.o: in function
> > > > `__static_call_transform':
> > > > static_call.c:(.ref.text+0x46): undefined reference to `cpu_wants_rethunk_at'
> > > > make[1]: [Makefile:1234: vmlinux] Error 1 (ignored)
> > > > --------------
> > > >
> > > > In v5.15.y, cpu_wants_rethunk_at is only built if CONFIG_STACK_VALIDATION=y,
> > > > but that is not supported for i386 builds. The dummy function in
> > > > arch/x86/include/asm/alternative.h doesn't take that dependency into account.
> > > >
> > >
> > > I found this bug too using the Slackware 15.0 32-bit kernel
> > > configuration.
> > >
> > > Here is a simple work around patch, but there may be a better solution...
> > >
> > > --- arch/x86/kernel/static_call.c.orig	2025-05-22 05:08:28.000000000 -0700
> > > +++ arch/x86/kernel/static_call.c	2025-05-27 10:25:27.630496538 -0700
> > > @@ -81,9 +81,12 @@
> > >  		break;
> > >
> > >  	case RET:
> > > +
> > > +#ifdef CONFIG_64BIT
> > >  		if (cpu_wants_rethunk_at(insn))
> > >  			code = text_gen_insn(JMP32_INSN_OPCODE, insn, x86_return_thunk);
> > >  		else
> > > +#endif
> > >  			code = &retinsn;
> > >  		break;
> > >
> >
> > Another option is to define the empty function when CONFIG_STACK_VALIDATION=n as below:
> >
> > --- 8< ---
> > From: Pawan Gupta <pawan.kumar.gupta@linux.intel.com>
> > Subject: [PATCH] x86/its: Fix undefined reference to cpu_wants_rethunk_at()
> >
> > Below error was reported in 32-bit kernel build:
> >
> >   static_call.c:(.ref.text+0x46): undefined reference to `cpu_wants_rethunk_at'
> >   make[1]: [Makefile:1234: vmlinux] Error
> >
> > This is because the definition of cpu_wants_rethunk_at() depends on
> > CONFIG_STACK_VALIDATION which is only enabled in 64-bit mode.
> >
> > Define the empty function when CONFIG_STACK_VALIDATION=n, rethunk mitigation
> > is anyways not supported without it.
> >
> > Reported-by: Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net>
> > Link: https://lore.kernel.org/stable/0f597436-5da6-4319-b918-9f57bde5634a@roeck-us.net/
> > Signed-off-by: Pawan Gupta <pawan.kumar.gupta@linux.intel.com>
> > ---
> >  arch/x86/include/asm/alternative.h | 2 +-
> >  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/alternative.h b/arch/x86/include/asm/alternative.h
> > index 1797f80c10de..a5f704dbb4a1 100644
> > --- a/arch/x86/include/asm/alternative.h
> > +++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/alternative.h
> > @@ -98,7 +98,7 @@ static inline u8 *its_static_thunk(int reg)
> >  }
> >  #endif
> >
> > -#ifdef CONFIG_RETHUNK
> > +#if defined(CONFIG_RETHUNK) && defined(CONFIG_STACK_VALIDATION)
> >  extern bool cpu_wants_rethunk(void);
> >  extern bool cpu_wants_rethunk_at(void *addr);
> >  #else
> > --
> > 2.34.1
> >
> 
> Thanks for looking at this Pawan.
> 
> Your new patch works fine on both Slackware 15.0 32-bit and 64-bit
> systems.

Thank you for verifying the patch.

  reply	other threads:[~2025-05-29 17:40 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-05-20 13:49 Greg Kroah-Hartman
2025-05-20 18:19 ` Florian Fainelli
2025-05-20 22:46 ` Shuah Khan
2025-05-21  1:53 ` Ron Economos
2025-05-21  3:16 ` Vijayendra Suman
2025-05-21  8:30 ` Jon Hunter
2025-05-21 12:39 ` Naresh Kamboju
2025-05-21 18:54 ` Mark Brown
2025-05-21 19:10 ` Alexandre Chartre
2025-05-21 21:25   ` Pawan Gupta
2025-05-22  5:09 ` Hardik Garg
2025-05-23  9:25 ` Guenter Roeck
2025-05-27 19:31   ` Richard Narron
2025-05-28  0:55     ` Pawan Gupta
2025-05-29  4:49       ` Richard Narron
2025-05-29 17:40         ` Pawan Gupta [this message]
2025-05-30  5:11           ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
2025-05-30  5:21             ` Pawan Gupta
2025-05-30  6:04             ` Pawan Gupta

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20250529174017.lwctaondsbg7tk37@desk \
    --to=pawan.kumar.gupta@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=dave.hansen@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux@roeck-us.net \
    --cc=richard@aaazen.com \
    --cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®