From: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab+huawei@kernel.org>
To: Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net>
Cc: linux-doc@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 5/9] docs: kdoc: remove the KernelEntry::is_kernel_comment member
Date: Sat, 7 Jun 2025 12:07:45 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20250607120745.7e0fee67@foz.lan> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250606163438.229916-6-corbet@lwn.net>
Em Fri, 6 Jun 2025 10:34:34 -0600
Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net> escreveu:
> entry::is_kernel_comment never had anything to do with the entry itself; it
> is a bit of local state in one branch of process_name(). It can, in fact,
> be removed entirely; rework the code slightly so that it is no longer
> needed.
>
> No change in the rendered output.
>
> Signed-off-by: Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net>
Not sure about this one. The idea of those warnings are to detect
non-kerneldoc markups that typically comes when someone "imports"
OOT drivers or Windows one into Linux.
I remember I catched several such cases in the past with the help
of those warnings.
> ---
> scripts/lib/kdoc/kdoc_parser.py | 16 ++++++++--------
> 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/scripts/lib/kdoc/kdoc_parser.py b/scripts/lib/kdoc/kdoc_parser.py
> index 3ea260b423e2..56299695abd1 100644
> --- a/scripts/lib/kdoc/kdoc_parser.py
> +++ b/scripts/lib/kdoc/kdoc_parser.py
> @@ -1216,7 +1216,6 @@ class KernelDoc:
>
> if doc_decl.search(line):
> self.entry.identifier = doc_decl.group(1)
> - self.entry.is_kernel_comment = False
>
> decl_start = str(doc_com) # comment block asterisk
> fn_type = r"(?:\w+\s*\*\s*)?" # type (for non-functions)
> @@ -1234,14 +1233,20 @@ class KernelDoc:
> if r.search(line):
> self.entry.decl_type = r.group(1)
> self.entry.identifier = r.group(2)
> - self.entry.is_kernel_comment = True
> #
> # Look for a function description
> #
> elif r2.search(line):
> self.entry.identifier = r2.group(1)
> self.entry.decl_type = "function"
> - self.entry.is_kernel_comment = True
> + #
> + # We struck out.
> + #
> + else:
> + self.emit_msg(ln,
> + f"This comment starts with '/**', but isn't a kernel-doc comment. Refer Documentation/doc-guide/kernel-doc.rst\n{line}")
> + self.state = state.NORMAL
> + return
>
> self.entry.identifier = self.entry.identifier.strip(" ")
>
> @@ -1263,11 +1268,6 @@ class KernelDoc:
> else:
> self.entry.declaration_purpose = ""
>
> - if not self.entry.is_kernel_comment:
> - self.emit_msg(ln,
> - f"This comment starts with '/**', but isn't a kernel-doc comment. Refer Documentation/doc-guide/kernel-doc.rst\n{line}")
> - self.state = state.NORMAL
> -
> if not self.entry.declaration_purpose and self.config.wshort_desc:
> self.emit_msg(ln,
> f"missing initial short description on line:\n{line}")
Thanks,
Mauro
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-06-07 10:07 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-06-06 16:34 [PATCH 0/9] A series of kernel-doc tweaks Jonathan Corbet
2025-06-06 16:34 ` [PATCH 1/9] docs: kdoc: simplify the PROTO continuation logic Jonathan Corbet
2025-06-07 9:59 ` Mauro Carvalho Chehab
2025-06-06 16:34 ` [PATCH 2/9] docs: kdoc: move the core dispatch into a state table Jonathan Corbet
2025-06-07 10:00 ` Mauro Carvalho Chehab
2025-06-06 16:34 ` [PATCH 3/9] docs: kdoc: remove the section_intro variable Jonathan Corbet
2025-06-07 10:03 ` Mauro Carvalho Chehab
2025-06-06 16:34 ` [PATCH 4/9] docs: kdoc: simplify the kerneldoc recognition code Jonathan Corbet
2025-06-07 10:05 ` Mauro Carvalho Chehab
2025-06-06 16:34 ` [PATCH 5/9] docs: kdoc: remove the KernelEntry::is_kernel_comment member Jonathan Corbet
2025-06-07 10:07 ` Mauro Carvalho Chehab [this message]
2025-06-07 13:22 ` Jonathan Corbet
2025-06-08 3:18 ` Mauro Carvalho Chehab
2025-06-06 16:34 ` [PATCH 6/9] docs: kdoc: remove the KernelEntry::descr pseudo member Jonathan Corbet
2025-06-07 10:14 ` Mauro Carvalho Chehab
2025-06-06 16:34 ` [PATCH 7/9] docs: kdoc: remove some ineffective code Jonathan Corbet
2025-06-07 10:09 ` Mauro Carvalho Chehab
2025-06-06 16:34 ` [PATCH 8/9] docs: kdoc: move the declaration regexes out of process_name() Jonathan Corbet
2025-06-07 10:11 ` Mauro Carvalho Chehab
2025-06-06 16:34 ` [PATCH 9/9] docs: kdoc: some final touches for process_name() Jonathan Corbet
2025-06-07 10:13 ` Mauro Carvalho Chehab
2025-06-07 9:58 ` [PATCH 0/9] A series of kernel-doc tweaks Mauro Carvalho Chehab
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20250607120745.7e0fee67@foz.lan \
--to=mchehab+huawei@kernel.org \
--cc=corbet@lwn.net \
--cc=linux-doc@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®