Re: [PATCH v2] fs/proc/task_mmu: add VM_SHADOW_STACK for arm64 when support GCS

[Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>]

On Sat, 7 Jun 2025 21:15:25 +0800 wangfushuai <wangfushuai@baidu.com> wrote:

> The recent commit adding VM_SHADOW_STACK for arm64 GCS did not update
> the /proc/[pid]/smaps display logic to show the "ss" flag for GCS pages.
> This patch adds the necessary condition to display "ss" flag.
> 
> ...
>
> --- a/fs/proc/task_mmu.c
> +++ b/fs/proc/task_mmu.c
> @@ -994,6 +994,9 @@ static void show_smap_vma_flags(struct seq_file *m, struct vm_area_struct *vma)
>  #ifdef CONFIG_ARCH_HAS_USER_SHADOW_STACK
>  		[ilog2(VM_SHADOW_STACK)] = "ss",
>  #endif
> +#if defined(CONFIG_ARM64_GCS)
> +		[ilog2(VM_SHADOW_STACK)] = "ss",
> +#endif
>  #if defined(CONFIG_64BIT) || defined(CONFIG_PPC32)
>  		[ilog2(VM_DROPPABLE)] = "dp",
>  #endif

It is possible to have CONFIG_ARM64_GCS=y when
CONFIG_ARCH_HAS_USER_SHADOW_STACK=n?  If so, is this a correct
combination?


Also, wouldn't it be nicer to code this as 

--- a/fs/proc/task_mmu.c~a
+++ a/fs/proc/task_mmu.c
@@ -991,7 +991,7 @@ static void show_smap_vma_flags(struct s
 #ifdef CONFIG_HAVE_ARCH_USERFAULTFD_MINOR
 		[ilog2(VM_UFFD_MINOR)]	= "ui",
 #endif /* CONFIG_HAVE_ARCH_USERFAULTFD_MINOR */
-#ifdef CONFIG_ARCH_HAS_USER_SHADOW_STACK
+#if defined(CONFIG_ARCH_HAS_USER_SHADOW_STACK) || defined(CONFIG_ARM64_GCS)
 		[ilog2(VM_SHADOW_STACK)] = "ss",
 #endif
 #if defined(CONFIG_64BIT) || defined(CONFIG_PPC32)
_