From: "Thomas Weißschuh" <linux@weissschuh.net>
To: Willy Tarreau <w@1wt.eu>, Shuah Khan <shuah@kernel.org>
Cc: linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
"Thomas Weißschuh" <linux@weissschuh.net>
Subject: [PATCH] selftests/nolibc: make stackprotector probing more robust
Date: Mon, 09 Jun 2025 09:39:16 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20250609-nolibc-stackprotector-robust-v1-1-a1cfc92a568a@weissschuh.net> (raw)
nolibc only supports symbol-based stackprotectors, based on the global
variable __stack_chk_guard. Support for this differs between
architectures and toolchains. Some use the symbol mode by default, some
require a flag to enable it and some don't support it at all.
Before the nolibc test Makefile required the availability of
"-mstack-protector-guard=global" to enable stackprotectors.
While this flag makes sure that the correct mode is available it doesn't
work where the correct mode is the only supported one and therefore the
flag is not implemented.
Switch to a more dynamic probing mechanism.
This correctly enables stack protectors for mips, loongarch and m68k.
Signed-off-by: Thomas Weißschuh <linux@weissschuh.net>
---
tools/testing/selftests/nolibc/Makefile | 5 ++++-
1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/nolibc/Makefile b/tools/testing/selftests/nolibc/Makefile
index 94176ffe46463548cc9bc787933b6cefa83d6502..853f3a846d4c0fb187922d3063ec3d1a9a30ae46 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/nolibc/Makefile
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/nolibc/Makefile
@@ -195,7 +195,10 @@ CFLAGS_sparc32 = $(call cc-option,-m32)
ifeq ($(origin XARCH),command line)
CFLAGS_XARCH = $(CFLAGS_$(XARCH))
endif
-CFLAGS_STACKPROTECTOR ?= $(call cc-option,-mstack-protector-guard=global $(call cc-option,-fstack-protector-all))
+_CFLAGS_STACKPROTECTOR = $(call cc-option,-fstack-protector-all) $(call cc-option,-mstack-protector-guard=global)
+CFLAGS_STACKPROTECTOR ?= $(call try-run, \
+ echo 'void foo(void) {}' | $(CC) -x c - -o - -S $(_CFLAGS_STACKPROTECTOR) | grep -q __stack_chk_guard, \
+ $(_CFLAGS_STACKPROTECTOR))
CFLAGS_SANITIZER ?= $(call cc-option,-fsanitize=undefined -fsanitize-trap=all)
CFLAGS ?= -Os -fno-ident -fno-asynchronous-unwind-tables -std=c89 -W -Wall -Wextra \
$(call cc-option,-fno-stack-protector) $(call cc-option,-Wmissing-prototypes) \
---
base-commit: 19272b37aa4f83ca52bdf9c16d5d81bdd1354494
change-id: 20250530-nolibc-stackprotector-robust-77c9f55a3921
Best regards,
--
Thomas Weißschuh <linux@weissschuh.net>
next reply other threads:[~2025-06-09 7:39 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-06-09 7:39 Thomas Weißschuh [this message]
2025-06-09 8:24 ` Willy Tarreau
2025-06-20 7:40 ` Willy Tarreau
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20250609-nolibc-stackprotector-robust-v1-1-a1cfc92a568a@weissschuh.net \
--to=linux@weissschuh.net \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=shuah@kernel.org \
--cc=w@1wt.eu \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®