mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Herve Codina <herve.codina@bootlin.com>
To: Claudiu Beznea <claudiu.beznea@tuxon.dev>
Cc: "robh+dt@kernel.org" <robh+dt@kernel.org>,
	Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
	"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@kernel.org>,
	Danilo Krummrich <dakr@kernel.org>,
	Saravana Kannan <saravanak@google.com>,
	Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>,
	Lizhi Hou <lizhi.hou@amd.com>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-pci@vger.kernel.org,
	Allan Nielsen <allan.nielsen@microchip.com>,
	Horatiu Vultur <horatiu.vultur@microchip.com>,
	Steen Hegelund <steen.hegelund@microchip.com>,
	Thomas Petazzoni <thomas.petazzoni@bootlin.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v8 5/5] PCI: of: Create device-tree PCI host bridge node
Date: Tue, 17 Jun 2025 09:00:29 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20250617090029.03283ea6@bootlin.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <3258d453-f262-4f1c-822b-5310a8346a2d@tuxon.dev>

Hi Claudiu,

On Fri, 13 Jun 2025 16:36:16 +0300
Claudiu Beznea <claudiu.beznea@tuxon.dev> wrote:

...

> I pointed to the wrong function. It's not of_pci_make_host_bridge_node()
> [1] but of_pci_make_dev_node() which creates a node with a similar naming
> and makes things not working on my side.
> 
> [1] https://elixir.bootlin.com/linux/v6.15/source/drivers/pci/of.c#L694

Ok, so your issue is not related patches applied from the "PCI: of: Create
device-tree PCI host bridge node" series.
  https://lore.kernel.org/all/20250224141356.36325-6-herve.codina@bootlin.com/

Indeed, this series add the node creation for the host bridge with
of_pci_make_host_bridge_node() but you pointed now of_pci_make_dev_node()
which is the creation for PCI device node and this function was not modify by the
series.

of_pci_make_host_bridge_node() should not create anything. Can you confirm on your
side that it doesn't create any nodes.

If so, maybe the problem comes from of_irq_parse_raw() or similar.

...

> 
> > 
> > On this system, I didn't observed any issues but of course, the PCIe drivers are
> > different.
> > Also, on my system, no node were created by of_pci_make_host_bridge_node().  
> 
> Sorry for the confusion, it is of_pci_make_dev_node() on my side which
> creates the node.
> 
> > 
> > To be honest, I didn't re-test recently to see if something has been broken.
> > I can do that on my side with my system.

I have re-tested and I confirm that I have no issue on my system.

> > 
> > On your side, maybe you can have look at the Armada PCIe driver and see if
> > something could explain your behavior. I am not sure that you need to add the
> > pci@0,0 node in your DT.  
> 
> I can't find a driver that uses the approach I'm trying in my patches. This
> approach was suggested in the review process [2] by Rob who mentioned that
> now we should be able drop legacy interrupt controller nodes. There are
> some Apple device trees that points the interrupt-map to the port node (the
> way I tried in my workaround) [3], but I can't find more than that.
> 
> The topology in my case is:
> 
> root@smarc-rzg3s:~# lspci -t
> -[0000:00]---00.0-[01]----00.0
> 
> root@smarc-rzg3s:~# lspci
> 00:00.0 PCI bridge: Renesas Technology Corp. Device 0033
> 01:00.0 Non-Volatile memory controller: Micron Technology Inc 2550 NVMe SSD
> (DRAM-less) (rev 01)
> 
> When not working pci@0,0 is exported as follows in rootfs:
> 
> root@smarc-rzg3s:~# ls /sys/firmware/devicetree/base/soc/pcie@11e40000 -l
> -r--r--r--    1 root     root             4 Jan 12 10:28 #address-cells
> -r--r--r--    1 root     root             4 Jan 12 10:28 #interrupt-cells
> -r--r--r--    1 root     root             4 Jan 12 10:28 #size-cells
> -r--r--r--    1 root     root             8 Jan 12 10:28 bus-range
> -r--r--r--    1 root     root            13 Jan 12 10:28 clock-names
> -r--r--r--    1 root     root            24 Jan 12 10:28 clocks
> -r--r--r--    1 root     root            26 Jan 12 10:28 compatible
> -r--r--r--    1 root     root             4 Jan 12 10:28 device-id
> -r--r--r--    1 root     root             4 Jan 12 10:28 device_type
> -r--r--r--    1 root     root            28 Jan 12 10:28 dma-ranges
> -r--r--r--    1 root     root             0 Jan 12 10:28 interrupt-controller
> -r--r--r--    1 root     root           144 Jan 12 10:28 interrupt-map
> -r--r--r--    1 root     root            16 Jan 12 10:28 interrupt-map-mask
> -r--r--r--    1 root     root           164 Jan 12 10:28 interrupt-names
> -r--r--r--    1 root     root             4 Jan 12 10:28 interrupt-parrent

Why parrent instead of parent in interrupt-parrent ?

> -r--r--r--    1 root     root           192 Jan 12 10:28 interrupts
> -r--r--r--    1 root     root             5 Jan 12 10:28 name
> -r--r--r--    1 root     root             4 Jan 12 10:28 num-lanes
> drwxr-xr-x    2 root     root             0 Jan 12 10:17 pci@0,0
> -r--r--r--    1 root     root             4 Jan 12 10:28 phandle
> -r--r--r--    1 root     root             4 Jan 12 10:28 pinctrl-0
> -r--r--r--    1 root     root             8 Jan 12 10:28 pinctrl-names
> -r--r--r--    1 root     root             4 Jan 12 10:28 power-domains
> -r--r--r--    1 root     root            28 Jan 12 10:28 ranges
> -r--r--r--    1 root     root            16 Jan 12 10:28 reg
> -r--r--r--    1 root     root             4 Jan 12 10:28 renesas,sysc
> -r--r--r--    1 root     root            63 Jan 12 10:28 reset-names
> -r--r--r--    1 root     root            56 Jan 12 10:28 resets
> -r--r--r--    1 root     root             5 Jan 12 10:28 status
> -r--r--r--    1 root     root             4 Jan 12 10:28 vendor-id
> root@smarc-rzg3s:~#
> root@smarc-rzg3s:~# ls
> /sys/firmware/devicetree/base/soc/pcie@11e40000/pci@0,0 -l
> -r--r--r--    1 root     root             4 Jan 12 10:17 #address-cells
> -r--r--r--    1 root     root             4 Jan 12 10:17 #interrupt-cells
> -r--r--r--    1 root     root             4 Jan 12 10:17 #size-cells
> -r--r--r--    1 root     root             8 Jan 12 10:17 bus-range
> -r--r--r--    1 root     root            41 Jan 12 10:17 compatible
> -r--r--r--    1 root     root             4 Jan 12 10:17 device_type
> -r--r--r--    1 root     root           144 Jan 12 10:17 interrupt-map
> -r--r--r--    1 root     root            16 Jan 12 10:17 interrupt-map-mask
> -r--r--r--    1 root     root            32 Jan 12 10:17 ranges
> -r--r--r--    1 root     root            20 Jan 12 10:17 reg
> root@smarc-rzg3s:~#
> root@smarc-rzg3s:~#
> root@smarc-rzg3s:~#
> root@smarc-rzg3s:~#
> root@smarc-rzg3s:~# cat
> /sys/firmware/devicetree/base/soc/pcie@11e40000/pci@0,0/compatible
> pci1912,33pciclass,060400pciclass,0604root@smarc-rzg3s:~#
> root@smarc-rzg3s:~#
> root@smarc-rzg3s:~#
> 
> In case I describe a port in device tree, it works because the pci@0,0 is
> not created anymore when device is enumerated and thus the interrupt
> parsing is working.
> 
> Herve: do you have some hints?

First interrupt-parrent in your /sys/firmware/devicetree/base/soc/pcie@11e40000
files.

If it is just a typo in this email, maybe the interrupt parsing itself.

Can you provide an extract for the DT with nodes created at runtime.
I mean can you run 'dtc -I dtb -O dts /proc/device-tree' and provide the output
related to PCI nodes including the PCIe controller ?

> 
> Rob: do you know some device trees where the interrupt-map points to the
> node itself as suggested in [2] so that I can check is something is missing
> on my side?
> 
> Thank you,
> Claudiu
> 
> [2] https://lore.kernel.org/all/20250509210800.GB4080349-robh@kernel.org/
> [3]
> https://elixir.bootlin.com/linux/v6.15/source/arch/arm64/boot/dts/apple/t8112.dtsi#L951
> 

Best regards,
Hervé

-- 
Hervé Codina, Bootlin
Embedded Linux and Kernel engineering
https://bootlin.com

  reply	other threads:[~2025-06-17  7:23 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-02-24 14:13 [PATCH v8 0/5] Add support for the PCI host bridge device-tree node creation Herve Codina
2025-02-24 14:13 ` [PATCH v8 1/5] driver core: Introduce device_{add,remove}_of_node() Herve Codina
2025-02-24 14:13 ` [PATCH v8 2/5] PCI: of: Use device_{add,remove}_of_node() to attach of_node to existing device Herve Codina
2025-02-28 20:58   ` Bjorn Helgaas
2025-03-03  9:42     ` Herve Codina
2025-02-24 14:13 ` [PATCH v8 3/5] PCI: of_property: Add support for NULL pdev in of_pci_set_address() Herve Codina
2025-02-24 14:13 ` [PATCH v8 4/5] PCI: of_property: Constify parameter in of_pci_get_addr_flags() Herve Codina
2025-02-24 14:13 ` [PATCH v8 5/5] PCI: of: Create device-tree PCI host bridge node Herve Codina
2025-02-28 21:21   ` Bjorn Helgaas
2025-03-03  9:49     ` Herve Codina
2025-06-11  8:26   ` Claudiu Beznea
2025-06-11 14:56     ` Herve Codina
2025-06-13 13:36       ` Claudiu Beznea
2025-06-17  7:00         ` Herve Codina [this message]
2025-06-18 10:42           ` Claudiu Beznea
2025-02-27 17:36 ` [PATCH v8 0/5] Add support for the PCI host bridge device-tree node creation Bjorn Helgaas

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20250617090029.03283ea6@bootlin.com \
    --to=herve.codina@bootlin.com \
    --cc=allan.nielsen@microchip.com \
    --cc=bhelgaas@google.com \
    --cc=claudiu.beznea@tuxon.dev \
    --cc=dakr@kernel.org \
    --cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
    --cc=horatiu.vultur@microchip.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=lizhi.hou@amd.com \
    --cc=rafael@kernel.org \
    --cc=robh+dt@kernel.org \
    --cc=saravanak@google.com \
    --cc=steen.hegelund@microchip.com \
    --cc=thomas.petazzoni@bootlin.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®