From: Zhang Rui <rui.zhang@intel.com>
To: rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-pm@vger.kernel.org,
srinivas.pandruvada@linux.intel.com
Subject: [PATCH] powercap: intel_rapl: Do not change CLAMPING bit if ENABLE bit cannot be changed
Date: Wed, 18 Jun 2025 11:03:30 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20250618030330.279410-1-rui.zhang@intel.com> (raw)
PL1 cannot be disabled on some platforms. The ENABLE bit is still set
after software clears it. This behavior leads to a scenario where, upon
user request to disable the Power Limit through the powercap sysfs, the
ENABLE bit remains set while the CLAMPING bit is inadvertently cleared.
According to the Intel Software Developer's Manual, the CLAMPING bit,
"When set, allows the processor to go below the OS requested P states in
order to maintain the power below specified Platform Power Limit value."
Thus this means the system may operate at higher power levels than
intended on such platforms.
Enhance the code to check ENABLE bit after writing to it, and stop
further processing if ENABLE bit cannot be changed.
Reported-by: Srinivas Pandruvada <srinivas.pandruvada@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Zhang Rui <rui.zhang@intel.com>
---
drivers/powercap/intel_rapl_common.c | 17 ++++++++++++++++-
1 file changed, 16 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/drivers/powercap/intel_rapl_common.c b/drivers/powercap/intel_rapl_common.c
index e3be40adc0d7..602f540cbe15 100644
--- a/drivers/powercap/intel_rapl_common.c
+++ b/drivers/powercap/intel_rapl_common.c
@@ -341,12 +341,27 @@ static int set_domain_enable(struct powercap_zone *power_zone, bool mode)
{
struct rapl_domain *rd = power_zone_to_rapl_domain(power_zone);
struct rapl_defaults *defaults = get_defaults(rd->rp);
+ u64 val;
int ret;
cpus_read_lock();
ret = rapl_write_pl_data(rd, POWER_LIMIT1, PL_ENABLE, mode);
- if (!ret && defaults->set_floor_freq)
+ if (ret)
+ goto end;
+
+ ret = rapl_read_pl_data(rd, POWER_LIMIT1, PL_ENABLE, false, &val);
+ if (ret)
+ goto end;
+
+ if (mode != val) {
+ pr_debug("%s cannot be %s\n", power_zone->name, mode ? "enabled" : "disabled");
+ goto end;
+ }
+
+ if (defaults->set_floor_freq)
defaults->set_floor_freq(rd, mode);
+
+end:
cpus_read_unlock();
return ret;
--
2.43.0
next reply other threads:[~2025-06-18 3:03 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-06-18 3:03 Zhang Rui [this message]
2025-06-18 17:04 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2025-06-18 23:33 ` Zhang, Rui
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20250618030330.279410-1-rui.zhang@intel.com \
--to=rui.zhang@intel.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com \
--cc=srinivas.pandruvada@linux.intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®