From: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
To: Alexander Usyskin <alexander.usyskin@intel.com>
Cc: Reuven Abliyev <reuven.abliyev@intel.com>, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [char-misc-next 1/3] mei: refcount mei_device
Date: Sat, 21 Jun 2025 11:07:08 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <2025062107-riding-stress-48a4@gregkh> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250618095433.3943546-2-alexander.usyskin@intel.com>
On Wed, Jun 18, 2025 at 12:54:31PM +0300, Alexander Usyskin wrote:
> mei_device lifetime is managed by devm procedure of parent device.
> But such memory is freed on device_del.
> Mei_device object is used by client object that may be alive after
> parent device is removed.
> It may lead to use-after-free if discrete graphics driver
> unloads mei_gsc auxiliary device while user-space holds
> open handle to mei character device.
>
> Replace devm lifetime management with reference counting
> to eliminate the use-after-free.
Overall, I like the end result, but note that if you just apply this
patch then:
> --- a/drivers/misc/mei/mei_dev.h
> +++ b/drivers/misc/mei/mei_dev.h
> @@ -474,6 +474,8 @@ struct mei_dev_timeouts {
> * @cdev : character device
> * @minor : minor number allocated for device
> *
> + * @refcnt : struct reference count
> + *
> * @write_list : write pending list
> * @write_waiting_list : write completion list
> * @ctrl_wr_list : pending control write list
> @@ -560,6 +562,8 @@ struct mei_device {
> struct cdev cdev;
> int minor;
>
> + struct kref refcnt;
> +
> struct list_head write_list;
> struct list_head write_waiting_list;
> struct list_head ctrl_wr_list;
You now have 2 reference counts controling the lifespan of this
structure, and it will be a mess.
Yes, you clean it up in the last patch, so overall it's ok, this is just
a worrying step.
Also, why are you using a kref? Why not use the real struct device if
you want to have a reference counted device structure? That is what
should be happening here, what's wrong with the struct device * that you
already have? Why not have that take over ownership instead of making a
newer intermediate reference counted object?
thanks,
greg k-h
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-06-21 9:07 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-06-18 9:54 [char-misc-next 0/3] mei: fix mei_device lifetime Alexander Usyskin
2025-06-18 9:54 ` [char-misc-next 1/3] mei: refcount mei_device Alexander Usyskin
2025-06-21 9:07 ` Greg Kroah-Hartman [this message]
2025-06-22 9:14 ` Usyskin, Alexander
2025-06-22 9:21 ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
2025-06-18 9:54 ` [char-misc-next 2/3] mei: set parent for char device Alexander Usyskin
2025-06-18 9:54 ` [char-misc-next 3/3] mei: make char device control its own lifetime Alexander Usyskin
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=2025062107-riding-stress-48a4@gregkh \
--to=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=alexander.usyskin@intel.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=reuven.abliyev@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®