Re: [PATCH 6.15 000/780] 6.15.3-rc1 review

[Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>]

On Sun, Jun 22, 2025 at 12:09:42AM +0200, Pascal Ernster wrote:
> [2025-06-19 06:17] Greg Kroah-Hartman:
> > On Wed, Jun 18, 2025 at 10:31:43PM +0200, Pascal Ernster wrote:
> > > Hello again,
> > > 
> > > 
> > > I've sent this email a few minutes ago but mixed up one of the In-Reply-To
> > > message IDs, so I'm resending it now with (hopefully) the correct
> > > In-Reply-To message IDs.
> > > 
> > > 
> > > I've bisected this and found that the issue is caused by commit
> > > f46262bbc05af38565c560fd960b86a0e195fd4b:
> > > 
> > > 'Revert "mm/execmem: Unify early execmem_cache behaviour"'
> > > 
> > > https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git/commit/?id=f46262bbc05af38565c560fd960b86a0e195fd4b
> > > 
> > > https://lore.kernel.org/stable/20250617152521.879529420@linuxfoundation.org/
> > > 
> > > https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/stable-queue.git/tree/queue-6.15/revert-mm-execmem-unify-early-execmem_cache-behaviour.patch?id=344d39fc8d8b7515b45a3bf568c115da12517b22
> > 
> > Thank you for digging into this.  Looks like I took the last patch in a
> > patch series and not the previous ones, which caused this problem.  I've
> > dropped this one now and will add it back next week after I also add all
> > the other ones in the series.
> 
> 
> You're welcome! :)
> 
> Btw, the same patch has turned up again in the stable queue für 6.15.4:
> 
> https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/stable-queue.git/log/queue-6.15/revert-mm-execmem-unify-early-execmem_cache-behaviour.patch
> 
> Is this intentional or a mistake?

Intentional, I took the whole series this time, right?

thanks,

greg k-h