mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
To: "Mi, Dapeng" <dapeng1.mi@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
	Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@kernel.org>,
	Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org>,
	Ian Rogers <irogers@google.com>,
	Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@intel.com>,
	Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com>,
	Kan Liang <kan.liang@linux.intel.com>,
	Andi Kleen <ak@linux.intel.com>,
	Eranian Stephane <eranian@google.com>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org,
	Dapeng Mi <dapeng1.mi@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [Patch v4 07/13] perf/x86/intel: Allocate arch-PEBS buffer and initialize PEBS_BASE MSR
Date: Mon, 23 Jun 2025 09:28:50 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20250623072850.GN1613200@noisy.programming.kicks-ass.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <8f6effaf-0a4b-411e-8e12-57f3c83069c2@linux.intel.com>

On Mon, Jun 23, 2025 at 09:17:23AM +0800, Mi, Dapeng wrote:
> 
> On 6/21/2025 5:20 PM, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> > On Fri, Jun 20, 2025 at 10:39:03AM +0000, Dapeng Mi wrote:
> >
> >> diff --git a/arch/x86/events/intel/ds.c b/arch/x86/events/intel/ds.c
> >> index b6eface4dccd..72b925b8c482 100644
> >> --- a/arch/x86/events/intel/ds.c
> >> +++ b/arch/x86/events/intel/ds.c
> >> @@ -625,13 +625,22 @@ static int alloc_pebs_buffer(int cpu)
> >>  	int max, node = cpu_to_node(cpu);
> >>  	void *buffer, *insn_buff, *cea;
> >>  
> >> -	if (!x86_pmu.ds_pebs)
> >> +	if (!intel_pmu_has_pebs())
> >>  		return 0;
> >>  
> >> -	buffer = dsalloc_pages(bsiz, GFP_KERNEL, cpu);
> >> +	/*
> >> +	 * alloc_pebs_buffer() could be called by init_arch_pebs_buf_on_cpu()
> >> +	 * which is in atomic context.
> >> +	 */
> >> +	buffer = dsalloc_pages(bsiz, preemptible() ? GFP_KERNEL : GFP_ATOMIC, cpu);
> >>  	if (unlikely(!buffer))
> >>  		return -ENOMEM;
> > Here we go again.. that is CPU_STARTING context, that has IRQs disabled
> > and as such no allocation is allowed. Not even GFP_ATOMIC -- this will
> > break PREEMPT_RT.
> 
> Thanks. So we could have to follow what current legacy PEBS does and defer
> the PEBS buffer allocation until creating perf events
> (x86_reserve_hardware()). 

The normal way to do this kind of thing is allocate in prepare, use in
starting, and the reverse on down, stop using in dying and free in dead.

Specifically we have the callbacks:

CPUHP_PERF_X86_PREPARE  -> x86_pmu.cpu_prepare()   / x86_pmu.cpu_dead()
CPUHP_PERF_X86_STARTING -> x86_pmu.cpu_starting()  / x86_pmu.cpu_dying()

to arrange for just such a setup.

  reply	other threads:[~2025-06-23  7:29 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 28+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-06-20 10:38 [Patch v4 00/13] arch-PEBS enabling for Intel platforms Dapeng Mi
2025-06-20 10:38 ` [Patch v4 01/13] perf/x86/intel: Replace x86_pmu.drain_pebs calling with static call Dapeng Mi
2025-06-20 10:38 ` [Patch v4 02/13] perf/x86/intel: Correct large PEBS flag check Dapeng Mi
2025-06-20 10:38 ` [Patch v4 03/13] perf/x86/intel: Initialize architectural PEBS Dapeng Mi
2025-06-20 10:39 ` [Patch v4 04/13] perf/x86/intel/ds: Factor out PEBS record processing code to functions Dapeng Mi
2025-06-20 10:39 ` [Patch v4 05/13] perf/x86/intel/ds: Factor out PEBS group " Dapeng Mi
2025-06-20 10:39 ` [Patch v4 06/13] perf/x86/intel: Process arch-PEBS records or record fragments Dapeng Mi
2025-06-20 10:39 ` [Patch v4 07/13] perf/x86/intel: Allocate arch-PEBS buffer and initialize PEBS_BASE MSR Dapeng Mi
2025-06-21  9:20   ` Peter Zijlstra
2025-06-23  1:17     ` Mi, Dapeng
2025-06-23  7:28       ` Peter Zijlstra [this message]
2025-06-23  8:41         ` Mi, Dapeng
2025-06-20 10:39 ` [Patch v4 08/13] perf/x86/intel: Update dyn_constranit base on PEBS event precise level Dapeng Mi
2025-06-20 10:39 ` [Patch v4 09/13] perf/x86/intel: Setup PEBS data configuration and enable legacy groups Dapeng Mi
2025-06-21  9:27   ` Peter Zijlstra
2025-06-23  1:20     ` Mi, Dapeng
2025-06-21  9:34   ` Peter Zijlstra
2025-06-23  1:38     ` Mi, Dapeng
2025-06-21  9:36   ` Peter Zijlstra
2025-06-23  1:39     ` Mi, Dapeng
2025-06-21  9:41   ` Peter Zijlstra
2025-06-23  1:55     ` Mi, Dapeng
2025-06-21  9:43   ` Peter Zijlstra
2025-06-23  1:55     ` Mi, Dapeng
2025-06-20 10:39 ` [Patch v4 10/13] perf/x86/intel: Add counter group support for arch-PEBS Dapeng Mi
2025-06-20 10:39 ` [Patch v4 11/13] perf/x86: Support to sample SSP register Dapeng Mi
2025-06-20 10:39 ` [Patch v4 12/13] perf/x86/intel: Support to sample SSP register for arch-PEBS Dapeng Mi
2025-06-20 10:39 ` [Patch v4 13/13] perf tools: x86: Support to show SSP register Dapeng Mi

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20250623072850.GN1613200@noisy.programming.kicks-ass.net \
    --to=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=acme@kernel.org \
    --cc=adrian.hunter@intel.com \
    --cc=ak@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=dapeng1.mi@intel.com \
    --cc=dapeng1.mi@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=eranian@google.com \
    --cc=irogers@google.com \
    --cc=kan.liang@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@redhat.com \
    --cc=namhyung@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®