From: Joey Gouly <joey.gouly@arm.com>
To: Steven Price <steven.price@arm.com>
Cc: kvm@vger.kernel.org, kvmarm@lists.linux.dev,
Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>,
Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>, Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>,
James Morse <james.morse@arm.com>,
Oliver Upton <oliver.upton@linux.dev>,
Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@arm.com>,
Zenghui Yu <yuzenghui@huawei.com>,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Alexandru Elisei <alexandru.elisei@arm.com>,
Christoffer Dall <christoffer.dall@arm.com>,
Fuad Tabba <tabba@google.com>,
linux-coco@lists.linux.dev,
Ganapatrao Kulkarni <gankulkarni@os.amperecomputing.com>,
Gavin Shan <gshan@redhat.com>,
Shanker Donthineni <sdonthineni@nvidia.com>,
Alper Gun <alpergun@google.com>,
"Aneesh Kumar K . V" <aneesh.kumar@kernel.org>,
Emi Kisanuki <fj0570is@fujitsu.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v9 11/43] arm64: RME: Allocate/free RECs to match vCPUs
Date: Wed, 25 Jun 2025 10:00:28 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20250625090028.GC111675@e124191.cambridge.arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250611104844.245235-12-steven.price@arm.com>
Hi Steven,
On Wed, Jun 11, 2025 at 11:48:08AM +0100, Steven Price wrote:
> The RMM maintains a data structure known as the Realm Execution Context
> (or REC). It is similar to struct kvm_vcpu and tracks the state of the
> virtual CPUs. KVM must delegate memory and request the structures are
> created when vCPUs are created, and suitably tear down on destruction.
>
> RECs must also be supplied with addition pages - auxiliary (or AUX)
> granules - for storing the larger registers state (e.g. for SVE). The
> number of AUX granules for a REC depends on the parameters with which
> the Realm was created - the RMM makes this information available via the
> RMI_REC_AUX_COUNT call performed after creating the Realm Descriptor (RD).
>
> Note that only some of register state for the REC can be set by KVM, the
> rest is defined by the RMM (zeroed). The register state then cannot be
> changed by KVM after the REC is created (except when the guest
> explicitly requests this e.g. by performing a PSCI call). The RMM also
> requires that the VMM creates RECs in ascending order of the MPIDR.
>
> See Realm Management Monitor specification (DEN0137) for more information:
> https://developer.arm.com/documentation/den0137/
>
> Signed-off-by: Steven Price <steven.price@arm.com>
> Reviewed-by: Gavin Shan <gshan@redhat.com>
> ---
> Changes since v7:
> * Add comment explaining the aux_pages array.
> * Rename "undeleted_failed" variable to "should_free" to avoid a
> confusing double negative.
> Changes since v6:
> * Avoid reporting the KVM_ARM_VCPU_REC feature if the guest isn't a
> realm guest.
> * Support host page size being larger than RMM's granule size when
> allocating/freeing aux granules.
> Changes since v5:
> * Separate the concept of vcpu_is_rec() and
> kvm_arm_vcpu_rec_finalized() by using the KVM_ARM_VCPU_REC feature as
> the indication that the VCPU is a REC.
> Changes since v2:
> * Free rec->run earlier in kvm_destroy_realm() and adapt to previous patches.
> ---
> arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_emulate.h | 7 ++
> arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_host.h | 3 +
> arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_rme.h | 27 ++++
> arch/arm64/kvm/arm.c | 13 +-
> arch/arm64/kvm/reset.c | 11 ++
> arch/arm64/kvm/rme.c | 180 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> 6 files changed, 239 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_emulate.h b/arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_emulate.h
> index a640bb7dffbc..302a691b3723 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_emulate.h
> +++ b/arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_emulate.h
> @@ -711,7 +711,14 @@ static inline bool kvm_realm_is_created(struct kvm *kvm)
>
> static inline bool vcpu_is_rec(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
> {
> + if (static_branch_unlikely(&kvm_rme_is_available))
> + return vcpu_has_feature(vcpu, KVM_ARM_VCPU_REC);
> return false;
> }
>
> +static inline bool kvm_arm_rec_finalized(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
> +{
> + return vcpu->arch.rec.mpidr != INVALID_HWID;
> +}
> +
> #endif /* __ARM64_KVM_EMULATE_H__ */
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_host.h b/arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_host.h
> index 18e6d72dabe9..58fe7b216126 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_host.h
> +++ b/arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_host.h
> @@ -883,6 +883,9 @@ struct kvm_vcpu_arch {
>
> /* Per-vcpu TLB for VNCR_EL2 -- NULL when !NV */
> struct vncr_tlb *vncr_tlb;
> +
> + /* Realm meta data */
> + struct realm_rec rec;
> };
>
> /*
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_rme.h b/arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_rme.h
> index 5f0de9a6d339..f716b890e484 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_rme.h
> +++ b/arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_rme.h
> @@ -6,6 +6,7 @@
> #ifndef __ASM_KVM_RME_H
> #define __ASM_KVM_RME_H
>
> +#include <asm/rmi_smc.h>
> #include <uapi/linux/kvm.h>
>
> /**
> @@ -65,6 +66,30 @@ struct realm {
> unsigned int ia_bits;
> };
>
> +/**
> + * struct realm_rec - Additional per VCPU data for a Realm
> + *
> + * @mpidr: MPIDR (Multiprocessor Affinity Register) value to identify this VCPU
> + * @rec_page: Kernel VA of the RMM's private page for this REC
> + * @aux_pages: Additional pages private to the RMM for this REC
> + * @run: Kernel VA of the RmiRecRun structure shared with the RMM
> + */
> +struct realm_rec {
> + unsigned long mpidr;
> + void *rec_page;
> + /*
> + * REC_PARAMS_AUX_GRANULES is the maximum number of granules that the
> + * RMM can require. By using that to size the array we know that it
> + * will be big enough as the page size is always at least as large as
> + * the granule size. In the case of a larger page size than 4k (or an
> + * RMM which requires fewer auxiliary granules), the array will be
> + * bigger than needed however the extra memory required is small and
> + * this keeps the code cleaner.
> + */
> + struct page *aux_pages[REC_PARAMS_AUX_GRANULES];
I think that something like this may work, and use the right amount of pages:
struct page *aux_pages[(REC_PARAMS_AUX_GRANULES * RMM_PAGE_SIZE) >> PAGE_SHIFT];
Thanks,
Joey
> + struct rec_run *run;
> +};
> +
> void kvm_init_rme(void);
> u32 kvm_realm_ipa_limit(void);
>
> @@ -72,6 +97,8 @@ int kvm_realm_enable_cap(struct kvm *kvm, struct kvm_enable_cap *cap);
> int kvm_init_realm_vm(struct kvm *kvm);
> void kvm_destroy_realm(struct kvm *kvm);
> void kvm_realm_destroy_rtts(struct kvm *kvm, u32 ia_bits);
> +int kvm_create_rec(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu);
> +void kvm_destroy_rec(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu);
>
> static inline bool kvm_realm_is_private_address(struct realm *realm,
> unsigned long addr)
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/kvm/arm.c b/arch/arm64/kvm/arm.c
> index b3e3323573c6..7be1bdfc5f0b 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/kvm/arm.c
> +++ b/arch/arm64/kvm/arm.c
> @@ -495,6 +495,8 @@ int kvm_arch_vcpu_create(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
> /* Force users to call KVM_ARM_VCPU_INIT */
> vcpu_clear_flag(vcpu, VCPU_INITIALIZED);
>
> + vcpu->arch.rec.mpidr = INVALID_HWID;
> +
> vcpu->arch.mmu_page_cache.gfp_zero = __GFP_ZERO;
>
> /* Set up the timer */
> @@ -1457,7 +1459,7 @@ int kvm_vm_ioctl_irq_line(struct kvm *kvm, struct kvm_irq_level *irq_level,
> return -EINVAL;
> }
>
> -static unsigned long system_supported_vcpu_features(void)
> +static unsigned long system_supported_vcpu_features(struct kvm *kvm)
> {
> unsigned long features = KVM_VCPU_VALID_FEATURES;
>
> @@ -1478,6 +1480,9 @@ static unsigned long system_supported_vcpu_features(void)
> if (!cpus_have_final_cap(ARM64_HAS_NESTED_VIRT))
> clear_bit(KVM_ARM_VCPU_HAS_EL2, &features);
>
> + if (!kvm_is_realm(kvm))
> + clear_bit(KVM_ARM_VCPU_REC, &features);
> +
> return features;
> }
>
> @@ -1495,7 +1500,7 @@ static int kvm_vcpu_init_check_features(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
> return -ENOENT;
> }
>
> - if (features & ~system_supported_vcpu_features())
> + if (features & ~system_supported_vcpu_features(vcpu->kvm))
> return -EINVAL;
>
> /*
> @@ -1517,6 +1522,10 @@ static int kvm_vcpu_init_check_features(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
> if (test_bit(KVM_ARM_VCPU_HAS_EL2, &features))
> return -EINVAL;
>
> + /* RME is incompatible with AArch32 */
> + if (test_bit(KVM_ARM_VCPU_REC, &features))
> + return -EINVAL;
> +
> return 0;
> }
>
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/kvm/reset.c b/arch/arm64/kvm/reset.c
> index 959532422d3a..2e9e855581d4 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/kvm/reset.c
> +++ b/arch/arm64/kvm/reset.c
> @@ -137,6 +137,11 @@ int kvm_arm_vcpu_finalize(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, int feature)
> return -EPERM;
>
> return kvm_vcpu_finalize_sve(vcpu);
> + case KVM_ARM_VCPU_REC:
> + if (!kvm_is_realm(vcpu->kvm) || !vcpu_is_rec(vcpu))
> + return -EINVAL;
> +
> + return kvm_create_rec(vcpu);
> }
>
> return -EINVAL;
> @@ -147,6 +152,11 @@ bool kvm_arm_vcpu_is_finalized(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
> if (vcpu_has_sve(vcpu) && !kvm_arm_vcpu_sve_finalized(vcpu))
> return false;
>
> + if (kvm_is_realm(vcpu->kvm) &&
> + !(vcpu_is_rec(vcpu) && kvm_arm_rec_finalized(vcpu) &&
> + READ_ONCE(vcpu->kvm->arch.realm.state) == REALM_STATE_ACTIVE))
> + return false;
> +
> return true;
> }
>
> @@ -161,6 +171,7 @@ void kvm_arm_vcpu_destroy(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
> free_page((unsigned long)vcpu->arch.ctxt.vncr_array);
> kfree(vcpu->arch.vncr_tlb);
> kfree(vcpu->arch.ccsidr);
> + kvm_destroy_rec(vcpu);
> }
>
> static void kvm_vcpu_reset_sve(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/kvm/rme.c b/arch/arm64/kvm/rme.c
> index 0f89295fa59c..f094544592b5 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/kvm/rme.c
> +++ b/arch/arm64/kvm/rme.c
> @@ -484,6 +484,186 @@ void kvm_destroy_realm(struct kvm *kvm)
> kvm_free_stage2_pgd(&kvm->arch.mmu);
> }
>
> +static void free_rec_aux(struct page **aux_pages,
> + unsigned int num_aux)
> +{
> + unsigned int i, j;
> + unsigned int page_count = 0;
> +
> + for (i = 0; i < num_aux;) {
> + struct page *aux_page = aux_pages[page_count++];
> + phys_addr_t aux_page_phys = page_to_phys(aux_page);
> + bool should_free = true;
> +
> + for (j = 0; j < PAGE_SIZE && i < num_aux; j += RMM_PAGE_SIZE) {
> + if (WARN_ON(rmi_granule_undelegate(aux_page_phys)))
> + should_free = false;
> + aux_page_phys += RMM_PAGE_SIZE;
> + i++;
> + }
> + /* Only free if all the undelegate calls were successful */
> + if (should_free)
> + __free_page(aux_page);
> + }
> +}
> +
> +static int alloc_rec_aux(struct page **aux_pages,
> + u64 *aux_phys_pages,
> + unsigned int num_aux)
> +{
> + struct page *aux_page;
> + int page_count = 0;
> + unsigned int i, j;
> + int ret;
> +
> + for (i = 0; i < num_aux;) {
> + phys_addr_t aux_page_phys;
> +
> + aux_page = alloc_page(GFP_KERNEL);
> + if (!aux_page) {
> + ret = -ENOMEM;
> + goto out_err;
> + }
> +
> + aux_page_phys = page_to_phys(aux_page);
> + for (j = 0; j < PAGE_SIZE && i < num_aux; j += RMM_PAGE_SIZE) {
> + if (rmi_granule_delegate(aux_page_phys)) {
> + ret = -ENXIO;
> + goto err_undelegate;
> + }
> + aux_phys_pages[i++] = aux_page_phys;
> + aux_page_phys += RMM_PAGE_SIZE;
> + }
> + aux_pages[page_count++] = aux_page;
> + }
> +
> + return 0;
> +err_undelegate:
> + while (j > 0) {
> + j -= RMM_PAGE_SIZE;
> + i--;
> + if (WARN_ON(rmi_granule_undelegate(aux_phys_pages[i]))) {
> + /* Leak the page if the undelegate fails */
> + goto out_err;
> + }
> + }
> + __free_page(aux_page);
> +out_err:
> + free_rec_aux(aux_pages, i);
> + return ret;
> +}
> +
> +int kvm_create_rec(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
> +{
> + struct user_pt_regs *vcpu_regs = vcpu_gp_regs(vcpu);
> + unsigned long mpidr = kvm_vcpu_get_mpidr_aff(vcpu);
> + struct realm *realm = &vcpu->kvm->arch.realm;
> + struct realm_rec *rec = &vcpu->arch.rec;
> + unsigned long rec_page_phys;
> + struct rec_params *params;
> + int r, i;
> +
> + if (kvm_realm_state(vcpu->kvm) != REALM_STATE_NEW)
> + return -ENOENT;
> +
> + if (rec->run)
> + return -EBUSY;
> +
> + /*
> + * The RMM will report PSCI v1.0 to Realms and the KVM_ARM_VCPU_PSCI_0_2
> + * flag covers v0.2 and onwards.
> + */
> + if (!vcpu_has_feature(vcpu, KVM_ARM_VCPU_PSCI_0_2))
> + return -EINVAL;
> +
> + BUILD_BUG_ON(sizeof(*params) > PAGE_SIZE);
> + BUILD_BUG_ON(sizeof(*rec->run) > PAGE_SIZE);
> +
> + params = (struct rec_params *)get_zeroed_page(GFP_KERNEL);
> + rec->rec_page = (void *)__get_free_page(GFP_KERNEL);
> + rec->run = (void *)get_zeroed_page(GFP_KERNEL);
> + if (!params || !rec->rec_page || !rec->run) {
> + r = -ENOMEM;
> + goto out_free_pages;
> + }
> +
> + for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(params->gprs); i++)
> + params->gprs[i] = vcpu_regs->regs[i];
> +
> + params->pc = vcpu_regs->pc;
> +
> + if (vcpu->vcpu_id == 0)
> + params->flags |= REC_PARAMS_FLAG_RUNNABLE;
> +
> + rec_page_phys = virt_to_phys(rec->rec_page);
> +
> + if (rmi_granule_delegate(rec_page_phys)) {
> + r = -ENXIO;
> + goto out_free_pages;
> + }
> +
> + r = alloc_rec_aux(rec->aux_pages, params->aux, realm->num_aux);
> + if (r)
> + goto out_undelegate_rmm_rec;
> +
> + params->num_rec_aux = realm->num_aux;
> + params->mpidr = mpidr;
> +
> + if (rmi_rec_create(virt_to_phys(realm->rd),
> + rec_page_phys,
> + virt_to_phys(params))) {
> + r = -ENXIO;
> + goto out_free_rec_aux;
> + }
> +
> + rec->mpidr = mpidr;
> +
> + free_page((unsigned long)params);
> + return 0;
> +
> +out_free_rec_aux:
> + free_rec_aux(rec->aux_pages, realm->num_aux);
> +out_undelegate_rmm_rec:
> + if (WARN_ON(rmi_granule_undelegate(rec_page_phys)))
> + rec->rec_page = NULL;
> +out_free_pages:
> + free_page((unsigned long)rec->run);
> + free_page((unsigned long)rec->rec_page);
> + free_page((unsigned long)params);
> + return r;
> +}
> +
> +void kvm_destroy_rec(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
> +{
> + struct realm *realm = &vcpu->kvm->arch.realm;
> + struct realm_rec *rec = &vcpu->arch.rec;
> + unsigned long rec_page_phys;
> +
> + if (!vcpu_is_rec(vcpu))
> + return;
> +
> + if (!rec->run) {
> + /* Nothing to do if the VCPU hasn't been finalized */
> + return;
> + }
> +
> + free_page((unsigned long)rec->run);
> +
> + rec_page_phys = virt_to_phys(rec->rec_page);
> +
> + /*
> + * The REC and any AUX pages cannot be reclaimed until the REC is
> + * destroyed. So if the REC destroy fails then the REC page and any AUX
> + * pages will be leaked.
> + */
> + if (WARN_ON(rmi_rec_destroy(rec_page_phys)))
> + return;
> +
> + free_rec_aux(rec->aux_pages, realm->num_aux);
> +
> + free_delegated_granule(rec_page_phys);
> +}
> +
> int kvm_init_realm_vm(struct kvm *kvm)
> {
> kvm->arch.realm.params = (void *)get_zeroed_page(GFP_KERNEL);
> --
> 2.43.0
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-06-25 9:00 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 89+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-06-11 10:47 [PATCH v9 00/43] arm64: Support for Arm CCA in KVM Steven Price
2025-06-11 10:47 ` [PATCH v9 01/43] kvm: arm64: Include kvm_emulate.h in kvm/arm_psci.h Steven Price
2025-06-11 10:47 ` [PATCH v9 02/43] arm64: RME: Handle Granule Protection Faults (GPFs) Steven Price
2025-06-11 10:48 ` [PATCH v9 03/43] arm64: RME: Add SMC definitions for calling the RMM Steven Price
2025-06-11 10:48 ` [PATCH v9 04/43] arm64: RME: Add wrappers for RMI calls Steven Price
2025-06-11 10:48 ` [PATCH v9 05/43] arm64: RME: Check for RME support at KVM init Steven Price
2025-06-11 10:48 ` [PATCH v9 06/43] arm64: RME: Define the user ABI Steven Price
2025-07-01 6:29 ` Gavin Shan
2025-06-11 10:48 ` [PATCH v9 07/43] arm64: RME: ioctls to create and configure realms Steven Price
2025-06-16 10:47 ` Suzuki K Poulose
2025-06-23 13:17 ` zhuangyiwei
2025-06-23 14:45 ` Steven Price
2025-06-11 10:48 ` [PATCH v9 08/43] kvm: arm64: Don't expose debug capabilities for realm guests Steven Price
2025-06-11 10:48 ` [PATCH v9 09/43] KVM: arm64: Allow passing machine type in KVM creation Steven Price
2025-07-01 6:38 ` Gavin Shan
2025-06-11 10:48 ` [PATCH v9 10/43] arm64: RME: RTT tear down Steven Price
2025-06-16 10:41 ` Suzuki K Poulose
2025-06-23 14:45 ` Steven Price
2025-06-11 10:48 ` [PATCH v9 11/43] arm64: RME: Allocate/free RECs to match vCPUs Steven Price
2025-06-25 9:00 ` Joey Gouly [this message]
2025-06-27 10:37 ` Steven Price
2025-06-11 10:48 ` [PATCH v9 12/43] KVM: arm64: vgic: Provide helper for number of list registers Steven Price
2025-07-01 10:16 ` Suzuki K Poulose
2025-06-11 10:48 ` [PATCH v9 13/43] arm64: RME: Support for the VGIC in realms Steven Price
2025-07-01 6:41 ` Gavin Shan
2025-07-01 10:20 ` Suzuki K Poulose
2025-07-03 13:22 ` Suzuki K Poulose
2025-07-09 14:42 ` Steven Price
2025-06-11 10:48 ` [PATCH v9 14/43] KVM: arm64: Support timers in realm RECs Steven Price
2025-07-01 6:42 ` Gavin Shan
2025-07-09 14:49 ` Joey Gouly
2025-07-09 15:29 ` Steven Price
2025-06-11 10:48 ` [PATCH v9 15/43] arm64: RME: Allow VMM to set RIPAS Steven Price
2025-06-17 12:56 ` zhuangyiwei
2025-06-23 14:45 ` Steven Price
2025-06-18 12:33 ` Andre Przywara
2025-06-23 14:45 ` Steven Price
2025-07-02 0:37 ` Gavin Shan
2025-07-09 14:42 ` Steven Price
2025-07-10 5:24 ` Gavin Shan
2025-06-11 10:48 ` [PATCH v9 16/43] arm64: RME: Handle realm enter/exit Steven Price
2025-06-25 1:45 ` Emi Kisanuki (Fujitsu)
2025-07-02 0:41 ` Gavin Shan
2025-06-11 10:48 ` [PATCH v9 17/43] arm64: RME: Handle RMI_EXIT_RIPAS_CHANGE Steven Price
2025-07-02 0:44 ` Gavin Shan
2025-06-11 10:48 ` [PATCH v9 18/43] KVM: arm64: Handle realm MMIO emulation Steven Price
2025-06-11 10:48 ` [PATCH v9 19/43] arm64: RME: Allow populating initial contents Steven Price
2025-08-01 1:56 ` Vishal Annapurve
2025-08-13 9:30 ` Steven Price
2025-08-14 16:26 ` Vishal Annapurve
2025-08-15 15:48 ` Steven Price
2025-08-15 18:18 ` Vishal Annapurve
2025-08-16 1:56 ` Vishal Annapurve
2025-06-11 10:48 ` [PATCH v9 20/43] arm64: RME: Runtime faulting of memory Steven Price
2025-06-16 11:55 ` Gavin Shan
2025-06-23 16:04 ` Steven Price
2025-07-02 1:04 ` Gavin Shan
2025-06-11 10:48 ` [PATCH v9 21/43] KVM: arm64: Handle realm VCPU load Steven Price
2025-06-11 10:48 ` [PATCH v9 22/43] KVM: arm64: Validate register access for a Realm VM Steven Price
2025-06-24 15:10 ` Joey Gouly
2025-06-11 10:48 ` [PATCH v9 23/43] KVM: arm64: Handle Realm PSCI requests Steven Price
2025-06-11 10:48 ` [PATCH v9 24/43] KVM: arm64: WARN on injected undef exceptions Steven Price
2025-06-11 10:48 ` [PATCH v9 25/43] arm64: Don't expose stolen time for realm guests Steven Price
2025-06-11 10:48 ` [PATCH v9 26/43] arm64: RME: allow userspace to inject aborts Steven Price
2025-06-11 10:48 ` [PATCH v9 27/43] arm64: RME: support RSI_HOST_CALL Steven Price
2025-06-11 10:48 ` [PATCH v9 28/43] arm64: RME: Allow checking SVE on VM instance Steven Price
2025-06-24 12:50 ` Joey Gouly
2025-06-11 10:48 ` [PATCH v9 29/43] arm64: RME: Always use 4k pages for realms Steven Price
2025-06-11 10:48 ` [PATCH v9 30/43] arm64: RME: Prevent Device mappings for Realms Steven Price
2025-06-11 10:48 ` [PATCH v9 31/43] arm_pmu: Provide a mechanism for disabling the physical IRQ Steven Price
2025-06-11 10:48 ` [PATCH v9 32/43] arm64: RME: Enable PMU support with a realm guest Steven Price
2025-06-11 10:48 ` [PATCH v9 33/43] arm64: RME: Hide KVM_CAP_READONLY_MEM for realm guests Steven Price
2025-06-11 10:48 ` [PATCH v9 34/43] arm64: RME: Propagate number of breakpoints and watchpoints to userspace Steven Price
2025-07-24 10:20 ` Joey Gouly
2025-06-11 10:48 ` [PATCH v9 35/43] arm64: RME: Set breakpoint parameters through SET_ONE_REG Steven Price
2025-06-11 10:48 ` [PATCH v9 36/43] arm64: RME: Initialize PMCR.N with number counter supported by RMM Steven Price
2025-07-24 10:47 ` Joey Gouly
2025-06-11 10:48 ` [PATCH v9 37/43] arm64: RME: Propagate max SVE vector length from RMM Steven Price
2025-06-11 10:48 ` [PATCH v9 38/43] arm64: RME: Configure max SVE vector length for a Realm Steven Price
2025-06-11 10:48 ` [PATCH v9 39/43] arm64: RME: Provide register list for unfinalized RME RECs Steven Price
2025-06-11 10:48 ` [PATCH v9 40/43] arm64: RME: Provide accurate register list Steven Price
2025-06-11 10:48 ` [PATCH v9 41/43] KVM: arm64: Expose support for private memory Steven Price
2025-06-12 15:14 ` Joey Gouly
2025-06-12 15:32 ` Steven Price
2025-06-11 10:48 ` [PATCH v9 42/43] KVM: arm64: Expose KVM_ARM_VCPU_REC to user space Steven Price
2025-06-11 10:48 ` [PATCH v9 43/43] KVM: arm64: Allow activating realms Steven Price
2025-06-25 1:51 ` [PATCH v9 00/43] arm64: Support for Arm CCA in KVM Emi Kisanuki (Fujitsu)
2025-06-27 10:37 ` Steven Price
2025-07-04 4:58 ` Gavin Shan
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20250625090028.GC111675@e124191.cambridge.arm.com \
--to=joey.gouly@arm.com \
--cc=alexandru.elisei@arm.com \
--cc=alpergun@google.com \
--cc=aneesh.kumar@kernel.org \
--cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
--cc=christoffer.dall@arm.com \
--cc=fj0570is@fujitsu.com \
--cc=gankulkarni@os.amperecomputing.com \
--cc=gshan@redhat.com \
--cc=james.morse@arm.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=kvmarm@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-coco@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=maz@kernel.org \
--cc=oliver.upton@linux.dev \
--cc=sdonthineni@nvidia.com \
--cc=steven.price@arm.com \
--cc=suzuki.poulose@arm.com \
--cc=tabba@google.com \
--cc=will@kernel.org \
--cc=yuzenghui@huawei.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®