From: Lee Jones <lee@kernel.org>
To: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@kernel.org>
Cc: Pavel Machek <pavel@kernel.org>, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>,
Hans de Goede <hansg@kernel.org>,
linux-leds@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] leds: trigger: ledtrig-cpu:: enforce NR_CPUS limit in Kconfig
Date: Wed, 25 Jun 2025 10:24:50 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20250625092450.GT795775@google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250620110820.3364008-1-arnd@kernel.org>
On Fri, 20 Jun 2025, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> From: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
>
> This driver fails build testing with larger values of CONFIG_NR_CPUS:
>
> drivers/leds/trigger/ledtrig-cpu.c: In function ‘ledtrig_cpu_init’:
> include/linux/compiler_types.h:571:45: error: call to ‘__compiletime_assert_726’ declared with attribute error: BUILD_BUG_ON failed: CONFIG_NR_CPUS > 9999
> drivers/leds/trigger/ledtrig-cpu.c:137:9: note: in expansion of macro ‘BUILD_BUG_ON’
> 137 | BUILD_BUG_ON(CONFIG_NR_CPUS > 9999);
>
> Enforce this limit in Kconfig instead to avoid the build failure.
I have so many questions!
- This number seems arbitrary - what is the limiting factor?
- Character size for printing?
- What platform did you test this on to blow through that number?
- What if we really do want 10000+ CPUs?
- And what will that LED array look like to support them all?
- If we're enforcing here, is the BUILD_BUG_ON() now superfluous?
> Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
> ---
> drivers/leds/trigger/Kconfig | 1 +
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/leds/trigger/Kconfig b/drivers/leds/trigger/Kconfig
> index c11282a74b5a..e07bd17cfe35 100644
> --- a/drivers/leds/trigger/Kconfig
> +++ b/drivers/leds/trigger/Kconfig
> @@ -65,6 +65,7 @@ config LEDS_TRIGGER_BACKLIGHT
> config LEDS_TRIGGER_CPU
> bool "LED CPU Trigger"
> depends on !PREEMPT_RT
> + depends on NR_CPUS <= 9999
> help
> This allows LEDs to be controlled by active CPUs. This shows
> the active CPUs across an array of LEDs so you can see which
> --
> 2.39.5
>
--
Lee Jones [李琼斯]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-06-25 9:24 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-06-20 11:08 Arnd Bergmann
2025-06-25 9:24 ` Lee Jones [this message]
2025-06-25 10:24 ` Arnd Bergmann
2025-06-25 10:36 ` Lee Jones
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20250625092450.GT795775@google.com \
--to=lee@kernel.org \
--cc=arnd@arndb.de \
--cc=arnd@kernel.org \
--cc=hansg@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-leds@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pavel@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®