From: Marco Crivellari <marco.crivellari@suse.com>
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>, Lai Jiangshan <jiangshanlai@gmail.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@kernel.org>,
Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@linutronix.de>,
Marco Crivellari <marco.crivellari@suse.com>,
Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Subject: [PATCH v1 07/10] Workqueue: mm: WQ_PERCPU added to alloc_workqueue users
Date: Wed, 25 Jun 2025 12:49:31 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20250625104934.184753-8-marco.crivellari@suse.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250625104934.184753-1-marco.crivellari@suse.com>
Currently if a user enqueue a work item using schedule_delayed_work() the
used wq is "system_wq" (per-cpu wq) while queue_delayed_work() use
WORK_CPU_UNBOUND (used when a cpu is not specified). The same applies to
schedule_work() that is using system_wq and queue_work(), that makes use
again of WORK_CPU_UNBOUND.
This lack of consistentcy cannot be addressed without refactoring the API.
alloc_workqueue() treats all queues as per-CPU by default, while unbound
workqueues must opt-in via WQ_UNBOUND.
This default is suboptimal: most workloads benefit from unbound queues,
allowing the scheduler to place worker threads where they’re needed and
reducing noise when CPUs are isolated.
This default is suboptimal: most workloads benefit from unbound queues,
allowing the scheduler to place worker threads where they’re needed and
reducing noise when CPUs are isolated.
This patch adds a new WQ_PERCPU flag to all the mm subsystem users to
explicitly request the use of the per-CPU behavior. Both flags coexist
for one release cycle to allow callers to transition their calls.
Once migration is complete, WQ_UNBOUND can be removed and unbound will
become the implicit default.
With the introduction of the WQ_PERCPU flag (equivalent to !WQ_UNBOUND),
any alloc_workqueue() caller that doesn’t explicitly specify WQ_UNBOUND
must now use WQ_PERCPU.
All existing users have been updated accordingly.
Suggested-by: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Marco Crivellari <marco.crivellari@suse.com>
CC: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
---
mm/backing-dev.c | 2 +-
mm/slub.c | 3 ++-
mm/vmstat.c | 3 ++-
3 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/mm/backing-dev.c b/mm/backing-dev.c
index 7e672424f928..3b392de6367e 100644
--- a/mm/backing-dev.c
+++ b/mm/backing-dev.c
@@ -969,7 +969,7 @@ static int __init cgwb_init(void)
* system_percpu_wq. Put them in a separate wq and limit concurrency.
* There's no point in executing many of these in parallel.
*/
- cgwb_release_wq = alloc_workqueue("cgwb_release", 0, 1);
+ cgwb_release_wq = alloc_workqueue("cgwb_release", WQ_PERCPU, 1);
if (!cgwb_release_wq)
return -ENOMEM;
diff --git a/mm/slub.c b/mm/slub.c
index b46f87662e71..cac9d5d7c924 100644
--- a/mm/slub.c
+++ b/mm/slub.c
@@ -6364,7 +6364,8 @@ void __init kmem_cache_init(void)
void __init kmem_cache_init_late(void)
{
#ifndef CONFIG_SLUB_TINY
- flushwq = alloc_workqueue("slub_flushwq", WQ_MEM_RECLAIM, 0);
+ flushwq = alloc_workqueue("slub_flushwq", WQ_MEM_RECLAIM | WQ_PERCPU,
+ 0);
WARN_ON(!flushwq);
#endif
}
diff --git a/mm/vmstat.c b/mm/vmstat.c
index 4c268ce39ff2..57bf76b1d9d4 100644
--- a/mm/vmstat.c
+++ b/mm/vmstat.c
@@ -2244,7 +2244,8 @@ void __init init_mm_internals(void)
{
int ret __maybe_unused;
- mm_percpu_wq = alloc_workqueue("mm_percpu_wq", WQ_MEM_RECLAIM, 0);
+ mm_percpu_wq = alloc_workqueue("mm_percpu_wq",
+ WQ_MEM_RECLAIM | WQ_PERCPU, 0);
#ifdef CONFIG_SMP
ret = cpuhp_setup_state_nocalls(CPUHP_MM_VMSTAT_DEAD, "mm/vmstat:dead",
--
2.49.0
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-06-25 10:49 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-06-25 10:49 [PATCH v1 00/10] Workqueue: replace system wq and change alloc_workqueue callers Marco Crivellari
2025-06-25 10:49 ` [PATCH v1 01/10] Workqueue: net: replace use of system_wq with system_percpu_wq Marco Crivellari
2025-06-25 10:49 ` [PATCH v1 02/10] Workqueue: mm: " Marco Crivellari
2025-06-25 10:49 ` [PATCH v1 03/10] Workqueue: fs: " Marco Crivellari
2025-06-25 10:49 ` [PATCH v1 04/10] Workqueue: " Marco Crivellari
2025-06-25 10:49 ` [PATCH v1 05/10] Workqueue: replace use of system_unbound_wq with system_dfl_wq Marco Crivellari
2025-06-25 10:49 ` [PATCH v1 06/10] Workqueue: net: WQ_PERCPU added to alloc_workqueue users Marco Crivellari
2025-06-25 10:49 ` Marco Crivellari [this message]
2025-06-25 10:49 ` [PATCH v1 08/10] Workqueue: fs: " Marco Crivellari
2025-06-25 10:49 ` [PATCH v1 09/10] Workqueue: WQ_PERCPU added to all the remaining users Marco Crivellari
2025-06-25 10:49 ` [PATCH v1 10/10] [Doc] Workqueue: WQ_UNBOUND doc upgraded Marco Crivellari
2025-07-11 10:32 ` [PATCH v1 00/10] Workqueue: replace system wq and change alloc_workqueue callers Marco Crivellari
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20250625104934.184753-8-marco.crivellari@suse.com \
--to=marco.crivellari@suse.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=bigeasy@linutronix.de \
--cc=frederic@kernel.org \
--cc=jiangshanlai@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mhocko@suse.com \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=tj@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®