From: Leon Romanovsky <leon@kernel.org>
To: K Prateek Nayak <kprateek.nayak@amd.com>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@redhat.com>,
Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@linaro.org>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Steve Wahl <steve.wahl@hpe.com>,
Dietmar Eggemann <dietmar.eggemann@arm.com>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>,
Ben Segall <bsegall@google.com>, Mel Gorman <mgorman@suse.de>,
Valentin Schneider <vschneid@redhat.com>,
Madadi Vineeth Reddy <vineethr@linux.ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] sched/topology: Correct "sched_domains_curr_level" in topology_span_sane()
Date: Thu, 26 Jun 2025 09:16:37 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20250626061637.GF17401@unreal> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250624041235.1589-1-kprateek.nayak@amd.com>
On Tue, Jun 24, 2025 at 04:12:35AM +0000, K Prateek Nayak wrote:
> The updated topology_span_sane() algorithm in commit ce29a7da84cd
> ("sched/topology: Refinement to topology_span_sane speedup") works on
> the "sched_domain_topology_level" hierarchy to detect overlap in
> !SDTL_OVERLAP domains using the tl->mask() as opposed to the
> sched_domain hierarchy (and the sched_domain_span()) in the previous
> approach.
>
> For NODE domain, the cpumask retunred by tl->mask() depends on the
> "sched_domains_curr_level". Unless the "sched_domains_curr_level" is
> reset during topology_span_sane(), it reflects the "numa_level" of the
> last sched_domain created which is incorrect.
>
> Reset the "sched_domains_curr_level" to the "tl->numa_level" during
> topology_span_sane(). Although setting "topology_span_sane" to 0 in
> topology_span_sane() should be enough since all domains with
> numa_level > 0 currently set SDTL_OVERLAP flag, setting it to
> "tl->numa_level" makes it more explicit and future proof against changes
> in the same area.
<...>
> Changes are based on tip:sched/urgent at commit 914873bc7df9 ("Merge tag
> 'x86-build-2025-05-25' of
> git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/tip/tip")
> ---
> kernel/sched/topology.c | 9 +++++++++
> 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+)
Sorry for the delay, we had internal issues with our verification cloud :(.
Thanks
prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-06-26 6:16 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-06-24 4:12 K Prateek Nayak
2025-06-25 15:32 ` Valentin Schneider
2025-06-26 4:24 ` K Prateek Nayak
2025-06-26 6:16 ` Leon Romanovsky [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20250626061637.GF17401@unreal \
--to=leon@kernel.org \
--cc=bsegall@google.com \
--cc=dietmar.eggemann@arm.com \
--cc=juri.lelli@redhat.com \
--cc=kprateek.nayak@amd.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mgorman@suse.de \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
--cc=steve.wahl@hpe.com \
--cc=vincent.guittot@linaro.org \
--cc=vineethr@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=vschneid@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®